Sentences with phrase «getting wrong numbers»

But there's a looming fear that potential investors would be discouraged to learn that people are scamming the company by boycotting ads as they expect to have accurate user data from Spotify for business decisions, not getting wrong numbers.

Someone else gives you what is said to be his home number — and the warning, «You didn't get it from me» — but when you call and ask for Bob Gibson, you're told, «You got the wrong number.»

Not exact matches

In this case, the Slate story by Franklin Foer has taken a number of fatal bullets by actual cybersecurity experts, but it's worth adding one more quick explanation of why the publication got it so wrong.

When shipping goods from A to B, any number of things can go wrong: cargo gets damaged, a congested port delays docking, a storm throws a vessel off course, pirates raid a ship.

The «Wrong» example forces the client to wade through a bunch of information and then decide to call, which means writing down or cut - and - pasting the phone number, leaving the email environment, making the call, playing phone tag maybe... all hassles can get in the way of actually setting up the meeting.

Don't get me wrong, attention is great but new leads add up to little more than vanity numbers if they don't convert.

Brad Delong is furious, and rerunning a number of his previous articles on Kudlow, who, he reminds us, got the housing bubble entirely wrong.

Furthermore, given the endless number of weird things a kid might ask it, the likelihood of getting something wrong is, well, quite high.

Remember, it won't be that useful to know the ROIC if you get the growth number completely wrong.

They don't doubt that Rome was wrong, but they have always suspected that most of their fellow reformers got a number of important things wrong themselves.

You did per capita wrong even with using the wrong data is is the abortion number / population number not the other way around, then multiplied by 100k to get rid of the number.

Therefore, to great numbers of people, doing wrong means only doing something at which they may get caught.

The numbers are pretty bad and it wouldn't take much to turn a lot of that around, but who will do the right thing when they are getting paid to do the wrong thing?

that the church has been wrong about homosexuality for 2000 years is just one of a number of things it has gotten wrong throughout its history.

Now when people similarly plug random numbers into the equations of their lives, filling in the gaps in their knowledge with religion, sometimes they get it right, by accident, (they are lucky) and oftentimes they get it wrong.

I can meet jeebus because I got my number calculations wrong!

I get the feeling that Henry was disagreeing with Wenger on a number of issues behind closed doors and as we all know Le Prof is NEVER EVER wrong.

«The decisions that are being made right now are whether a sport makes money for the university, or whether it in some ways gets the numbers wrong with Title IX,» he says.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up and say i was wrong this morning for giving wenger stick and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light of day and had a chance to reevaluate the situation and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back and work his magic on welbeck and get him scoring goals and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one of those wenger gems that he finds and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black and white for all to see and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all

But if you get DSQ with no performance gain because of a wrong number I do n`t understand how you only get a fine when modifying a safety part and gaining advantage.

I wondered that too but a friend pointed out that while Sanchez has seemingly had a number of teams looking to speak to him ozil hasn't had many, maybe he's just realised he's better off staying where he is, don't get me wrong I'm happy he is.

Don't get me wrong... that team was the number 1 overall seed but I never felt they were a real Ship threat with DR at the 5.

Unfortunately, you'd be wrong, and the 27 - year - old has an absurdly low number of top flight goals to his name considering his age, the teams he's played for, and the amount of hype he generally gets.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming Carmella's numbers are bad, it's more that I don't know what to make of them due to the current factors.

Your not wrong, I remember a good number of years back we would give our say on Stokes footballing abilities leading up to a game and I remember thinking that they will use those headlines hanging on locker room wall against us and then we would get bulldozed during the game.

Therefore, anyone interested in playing Utah State can now comfortably get down at the key number of -7 without being overly concerned about buying back the wrong side of a sharp move.

Now don't get me wrong, I don't run the most, we've got a lot of players that do that, but my numbers are good so I'm happy.»

It's a bit of an understatement to say that Van Gaal has got a lot of things wrong in his time at United, but whether the number of academy debutants has come about by accident or design, youth development is certainly not one of them.

either his scouts got it massively wrong or he was just singing someone to make up the numbers!

Nabil Bentaleb 5 — Made the wrong decisions on the ball and got caught in possession a number of times resulting in a Palace chance.

Regarding keepers I think Fabianski should be number one and he hasn't done anything wrong to get dropped.It will also affect his confidence which is up now after a long time.Chesney has to wait like Almunia and Fabianski to take his chance when the others are not performing well

They have got a number of teams at exactly the wrong time, while injuries to key attacking players have made Liverpool look toothless in the final third.

Don't get me wrong, there are some things on this list I definitely agree with, but when it starts out with number one saying it's a mistake to share a bed with your baby, you can bet that I'm going to take the whole list with a grain of salt.

Your contact details — a wrong phone number or an email that bounces back isn't going to look good if that potential employer tries to get in touch.

If you are experiencing depression during pregnancy or in the postpartum period, it is essential that you remind yourself that you are not to blame for how you are feeling and have done nothing wrong to cause the depression, that you are not alone because there are a growing number of health care providers who are understanding more about the nature of this disorder and because there are avenues to seek out emotional support, and finally, with the proper treatment, you will get well.

(And don't get me wrong — I'm a numbers girl — but I can see the limitations in them here.)

And don't get me wrong, there are definitely a decent number of foods you re...

And don't get me wrong, there are definitely a decent number of foods you really shouldn't eat when you're preggers.

Since writing about this subject three years ago I can not count the number of messages I have received that said, «My pedi said there was nothing wrong so we suffered for months, then we got a second opinion and discovered a severe tie!»

Not as in «we got that number wrong», or as in «it depends on your point of view», but as in «that event provably didn't happen and even a cursory look would have demonstrated it».

Ministers have been left red - faced after it emerged the government had got its figures wrong on the number of playing fields sold off under the coalition.

She said: «Is he also concerned that given the number of Home Office decisions that were got wrong on these Windrush cases about a wider culture of disbelief, about whether a net migration target is distorting decisions and also about the lack of checks and balances in the system to prevent injustices?»

Predictions that the numbers would drop off as the weather got worse and the seas became colder and rougher have, sadly, been proved wrong.

@MSalters No, obviously you got me wrong, the US could have different numbers of people in two different countries, but here the problem is mutual, the diplomats of Russia in the US is much less than those of the US in Russia.

«I have got a number of political predictions wrong in my career, but this is the first that has gone to helping such a worthwhile cause.

A short dizzy spell enjoyed by large numbers of gay and bisexual men was deemed so evil and unhealthy that they went as far as passing an Act of Parliament, despite widespread medical and political opinion - even from within their own party - telling them they had got it wrong.

A number of Conservatives explained that they were very much eurosceptic - don't get them wrong, guv - but they couldn't quite stretch to this one.

Somebody's got to say it, so I will: YouGov's numbers are wrong.

Only a few months ago, he got his facts wrong on the number of black students studying at Oxford university.