Sentences with word «ghg»

Generally the costs of reducing GHG emissions by saving energy are lower than by switching to alternative energy sources, in particular biofuels.

This indicates a pretty rapid response to a change in GHGs in the atmosphere.

But I do not think that the analysis can be used to exclude the possibility of a contribution of increased GHG forcing.

Combined with relevant geographic requirements, these analyses informed development of their software model and serve as the basis for tailored GHG reduction plans.

There is thermal radiation from GHGs in the atmosphere.

It discusses the driving forces for GHG emissions and mitigation in the short and medium terms and emphasizes the role of technology relative to social, economic and institutional inertia.

When food waste, including coffee, is put into a landfill, it breaks down very slowly, releasing methane and other GHGs as it does.

My analysis is not able to say what proportion of anthropogenic GHG warming is directly attributable to CO2.

If developed countries were to be subject to limitations on GHGs then there would be competition among developing countries to lower embedded emissions in their products as buying nations demanded lower emissions.

Certainly, CO2 and other anthropogenic GHG emissions are a potent driver of warming, with water serving in a feedback role due to its short atmospheric lifetime.

Any increase in energy in the air from more GHGs on our water planet is offset by a faster water cycle moving energy more quickly through the system.

Yet nearly all international and national proposals do not focus on atmospheric GHG levels, but rather on «emissions reductions» from current «business - as - usual» emissions levels.

There remains a misunderstanding of the atmospheric GHG effect, especially the effect of the contribution of downward long wave radiation to water.

They are differentiated according to where they occur in the process between emitting GHGs and the loss of human wellbeing.

But the huge human - made GHG changes cause ice to be melting all over the planet.

As I wrote last year, the nations of the world should immediately begin emergency methane monitoring across the entire permafrost region «'' and, of course, aggressive GHG mitigation.

Eventually, there may be a call for international standards for products relative to carbon intensity and that too needs GHG inventory access.

Our 2007 work, and the work in our new paper make it clear that without GHG emissions mitigation, there is no sustainable future for polar bears or other ice dependent creatures.

The models will never be 100 % correct, but they get it even more wrong if GHGs are not included.

Growing crops for fuel — known as biofuels — represents another potential way of cutting GHGs by replacing fossil fuels (biofuels created underground by nature over millions of years).

So, you have to find a way to reduce the cost of low GHG energy to below that of fossil fuel energy.

They explain high temperatures with high GHG levels, which you apparently don't.

These prices do not include the cost of a backup for wind and solar require, or the costs in terms of human health or rising GHG emissions from fossil fuels.

You can't even get the atmospheric budget remotely correct without including GHGs, and in the correct amount.

It includes guidance for states to prevent GHG regulation from removing the grid emissions benefits of voluntary renewable energy and maintain private investment in emissions - reducing renewable energy.

But the challenges in using § 115 (both Congressional intent and what we've already seen from the courts) to regulate GHGs make any successful outcome practically impossible.

That would limit the amount of GHGs per unit of output rather than putting a cap on aggregate emissions.