The ideal is that we bring a new striker that can hold up play and has some pace to lead our line and stick withe walcott on the wings or as a sub striker and
giroud as second choice striker if walcott play on the wings
Which would mean us very solid in deed if we can get a top striker, to go along with
Giroud as second choice.
Not exact matches
We can get let's say rues and keep
giroud as our main striker with welbeck
as second choice.
Should we keep
Giroud as a strong
second choice.
Giroud is a good striker but no top club would have giroud as their main striker, second choice possibly to offer something different but not first c
Giroud is a good striker but no top club would have
giroud as their main striker, second choice possibly to offer something different but not first c
giroud as their main striker,
second choice possibly to offer something different but not first
choice.
The Benzema problem is also affecting the Gunners striker Olivier
Giroud,
as some in France believe that he should be
second choice to Karim and are jeering Olly during games.
And
Giroud too is a
second choice striker, we should have got a better striker in the summer and
Giroud as his cover..
Tubby, you called it mate, we have the most fickle fans on the planet, last night doesn't mean all of a sudden were crap, what it does mean is certain players need to take a long hard look at themselves
as Arsene is taking serious heat by showing his loyalty to them namely, ozil and per, just not good enough and
as for welbeck he should never been given an arsenal shirt,
Giroud had a mare but he has proven this year that he is a great squad player but can not be our first
choice striker, gooners keep the faith and hope that Monaco try to play ball in
second leg cos if we turn up we could still hammer them.
Giroud even bagged himself the winning goal in the 85th minute to show his worth to the Gunners, but he will remain
as the club's
second choice behind Alexandre Lacazette, who opened the scoring.
Summary:
Giroud is not a first
choice striker for a team which has title winning ambitions but then he not the worst either;
AS a
second choice striker he is pretty good
As I have said since we signed
Giroud, he is a
second choice at best but he is all we have right now and we have to just get on with it..
Another player that benefited from playing for Arsenal is
Giroud, a
second choice at Arsenal but plays
as France's main striker.
@almostawinner I totally agree with you we are good at creating chances we reach very good positions but
giroud is less than average he won't even play at some mid-tables teams beleive me he can't dribble he rarely take long ranged shots he is not the best at movement I don't understand what do arsene wenger see in him to rely on him
as our first
choice We were going to get a striker three years ago (higuain) but the deal failed in the last
second because wenger prefered to get ozil so what did
giroud do to prove that he deserves his position can anybody tell me I really get mad when some arsenal fans tell that he is a good player because he is not!!