Sentences with phrase «giroud does»

Being a fan of giroud does nt make giroud a WC player for hleb or any other fan.

giroud does nt have the speed of welbeck but he has much better movement especially at the near post and much better finishing, welbeck should be sold before we even think about selling walcott or giroud

Mathieu Debuchy is expected to leave Arsenal this summer, but, judging by the photo below, which was taken in training on Tuesday, his teammate and fellow France international Olivier Giroud doesn't want him to go!

I honestly don't mind if giroud doesn't play much he's been essentially playing every game for the full 90 and he gives 100 % every time.

I think we do need a better striker than giroud and giroud does go on barren spells but he is better than we think.

Not to bash on wenger, because i do very well understand why he would play him on the lateral side of the pitch: He simply is not good enough as a goalscorer, and can not hold up and serve others like Giroud does.

A player for Giroud to compete with makes sense, and if the player turns out to offer more than Giroud does, well that can only be a good thing.

Sczcesny Bellerin Gab Kos Monreal Coq Ramsey Wilshear Cazorla Sanchez Walcott I am 100 % sure it will be the same as usual (except GK) Bellerin Mert Kos Monreal Coq Cazorla Ramsey Ozil Sanchez Giroud It doesn't matter who starts, we need to retain the Fa cup...

That lacezed (forgive me if spelled wrong) is even better than benzima, giroud does nt even count.oh and nalib kid is talented that his father wont mind his kid growing under wenger wing.it all makes you wonder sometimes what our scouts are doing if we ai nt signing any great talent

OOoo i think we should take a dip at Benteke 25 million should do it, not the skillful wide player, but offers everything Giroud does and has a little more pace.

I am not one of the Arsenal fans who groans and moans about everything that Olivier Giroud does.

Giroud does not make runs.

Giroud doesn't want «competition» meaning real competition.

In my opinion it has been proved that injury to Giroud does hurt us, we lose some potency.

The final decision on the future of the Arsenal and France international centre forward Olivier Giroud does not lie with his agent, of course, but you would think that Michael Manuello would have a fairly good idea where things stand with his client and his role with Gunners.

I know Giroud doesn't do great against top teams or in big matches ie Monaco.

Giroud does more than just score, he's enormous and can be a handful for defenders, he's also good at creating space for the wingers.

I am not just looking at goals and assists because we all know that Giroud does a lot for the team and we are different when he leads the line.

I don't think Jack or Santi are the answer for left wing & as good a job as Giroud does he doesn't inspire the front line of a title winning side.

My poimt exactly giroud does an okay job and when we signed him I thought he'd become a stop gap.

If Im being honest and we are looking to bring in a striker that can do similar to what Giroud does (hold up / links play / assists / & chip in with goals) rather than an all out goal scorer... well in my opinion Ibra is a step up from Giroud even at his age.

unfortunately our striker problem persists we are looking to Welbeck as our savior, just because the other options are pathetic, but other than the hard work and running he did not score, same as Lamp Post nobody says Donkey Giroud does not give his best he does, BUT he does not score and that is what we need a Striker that scores....

As well as arsenal can't afford to gamble the game against the magpies, giroud doesn't deserve to be rested.

I do nt care how Giroud does it. . .

If Giroud does that but it isn't simple good enough at this level I don't see what more he can do — take himself off the field?

Last, re the form vs best player argument: either way you look at it with form or best on paper, Giroud doesn't make the lineup.

All this Coq is good enough talk, Giroud does the job.

The only striker I think can fit into our syle of play is benteke... but again is he better than giroud, can he bring our grt midfielders into play as giroud does...

You REALLY believe Giroud does not give 100 % for the shirt.

I don't think he is world class or anything like that but I think he brings us a lot more than Giroud does.

I think he would struggle with the pace of Premier League defenders much like Giroud does.

Giroud does have an impressive goal tally.

Maybe concentrate on the other 10 players on the pitch if Giroud doesn't float your boat?

Giroud does not fully fit in too.

I prefer Giroud to Benzema Giroud doesn't have to contend with allegations of underage prostitutes and Blackmailing other players

Giroud does it too..

I still feel we need another CF who has all the attributes Giroud does not — pace and skill on the ball.

i'll be even happier if i see our players shutting down shooters, if coq replaces flam, if we don't overpass, if walcott tries, if ramsey does b2b properly, if giroud does nt shoot straight at GK.

«It also shows you how quickly things can change because two months ago everyone said, «Giroud doesn't play», then today he is a hero.

BUT Giroud does play to the best of his abilities and that's all he can do.

the team looks well equipped, but whats the point if injuries keep occurring.fact that giroud does nt run much all the time may be a contributing factor to his fitness.as some dutch fitness coach mentioned, wenger should restropect on his training regime and do the needfull.that is more important than buying players.....

I have received a lots of dislike for saying this but Giroud does not deserve to be our first choice striker.

My suggestion is that if Sanchez can learn that, he has the potential to do it much better than giroud does because he is faster off the mark and can dribble.he's too honest in his running so I disagree with those that think it's the set up of the team that failed him.his movement is still a little naive for the premier league Secondly on the left wide argument.Wenger is jamming attacking midfielder out there so as to provide cover for the defensive midfielder using two box to box battlers.it only makes sense because we have lots of them and it can be effective if well mastered.the catch is sacrificing a winger for the the attacking midfielder.if your memory serves you well you'll remember that artetas downward spiral began when teams noticed he was the hub for our possession and started deploying their number 10 to press him.it's been working for ages and can be used on any defensive midfielder regardless of the size so You'll end up with your much cried for cavarlho, kedihra, bender, schneiderline, and every other one passing sideways and backward because of the pressure so I personally appreciate the innovative move but Again appeal to Ramsey and Wilshire to take their job more serious.

He interchanges with the wingers so well and makes their attack and counterattack so fluid, something Giroud does not do so well.

he fits our style of play and can play the role giroud does.

What Giroud does do really well is fight for everything sent up to him.

With Sanchez, he brings something that Giroud doesn't offer.

Highly doubtful Arsene will buy someone to do the job Giroud does, Arsene is looking for something different judging by our recent targets.

Do we need someone else, hell yes, but Giroud does deserve credit when he does well.

they had at least one ligitamate goal, they are 17 pts ahead of us, they are better, giroud does not belong on the same pitch as kane, he has been a 5 yr joke, we always talk about getting a world class center forward, we never do, gabriel is a disaster in the box, lets face it, we are a 6th place team...