Sentences with phrase «giroud upfront»

Not only this but the resurgence of Lukas Podolski on the left and Olivier Giroud upfront alongwith the superlative form of Theo Walcott has left Arsenal with plenty of attacking options.
With Giroud upfront, Arsenal couldn't stretch play, and instead tried playing off of Giroud; without Ramsey, though, or any other player with intuitive goal - scoring movement (such as Danny Welbeck, Theo Walcott or Alexandre Lacazette), Arsenal's attack was ineffectual.
Team News & Possible Lineups: Arsenal are expected to start with Olivier Giroud upfront with Ozil, Ramsey and Sanches playing in attacking roles.
It's clear Arsenal have big problems in the final third and having Giroud upfront doesn't help.
Did we see the cup game with Sanogo and Giroud upfront?
Would love to see an Alexis, Giroud, Lacazette partnership some day with Giroud upfront and the two right behind him in a 3 -4-2-1....
With Giroud upfront????.
the reason is the starting lineup with Giroud upfront.
It would be better if he has both Sanchez and Giroud upfront, so he can have option to drop it short in front of giroud or for the runner in Sanchez.
If an Isco is available, I'd look to bring him in, that way we can rotate Walcott and Giroud upfront.
How come you have Giroud upfront and Mert at the back as starters and you want to win the league without any lost matches...
Most clear - cut chances missed in the last 3 Premier League seasons: Giroud (46), Agüero (45), Van Persie (40), Cissé (36), Lukaku (33) Olivier Giroud: No player has missed more clear - cut chances in the CL this season than Giroud (6) did in just 2 apps we need a new striker can't see us winning the league with giroud upfront
Like seriously, instead of using Giroud upfront, if Arsene won't play Theo there, he should use Ramsey and play Ox and Sanchez on either sides.
With Giroud upfront we do nt even attempt to counter the opposition with pace.We just wait for the opposition defence to get back in their own half and then its just sideways passing.Remember how we ripped United and Leicester a new one with our pace..
Giroud is good but not good enough to win us EPL, that's Henry is saying; and am afraid he makes all the sense in the world, buy Lacazette to compete with Giroud upfront.
He took Sanchez, Giroud (who was a nightmare for Kolo and Skertel) and Chambers off and brings defensive minded players... So even at 11 against 10 we were forced to back up because, and anyway, Welbeck is showing game after game why he was sold by Man United (not good enough and clumsy as f*ck) and we had no serious plan to go forward anymore... When the simple logic would ask you to leave Giroud upfront and Sanchez who are constant problems for defenders...!!!
You can drop Sanchez on Walcott position and put Sanogo / Giroud upfront, then you can switch between Ozil and Cazorla / Podolski or between Ox and Wilshere / Rosicky.
Giroud upfront with Walcott on the right wing, he could swap wings with Ox during the match.
Well van pussy scored thirty goals for us... i bet we would have finished 7th or 8th that season with giroud upfront He also had 27 the nxt czon at manure..
If we had strikers galore i'd love Welbz and Giroud upfront together
Rashford (and maybe Martial or Lingard) could surprise us, just like he did last year... With this kind of scenario, I guess playing Giroud upfront makes sense, to shake their defence and open spaces for Sanchez, Ozil and Walcott.
(Giroud upfront and Walcott on wing).
I would rather have giroud upfront.
don't want ozil there but its better as i don't like giroud up front, anything else is bettter than giroud upfront for whole 90 mins.
Don't be deceived... playing welbeck on the right is more like playing hm as second striker... he 4gets he's a winger and confuses giroud upfront.....
Arsenal will be just fine with or without Giroud upfront.
In the big games with giroud upfront it looked like we had nothing and the cohesion was wrong and we were not threatening
He would rather play it safe, play Giroud upfront and drown us in mediocrity while feeding us false hope that we can challenge which is a big specialization in failure if you think about.
we can not go another season with giroud upfront..
I honestly cant stand giroud upfront and cazorla LW the unbalance in the team is ridiculous.
The fact that wengers hasn't signed anoda target man says a lot about not very many beta than him... can you imagine how griezman would ve performed without Giroud upfront for france....
Completely agree that in the past Wenger didn't think he was ready but I think he is changing his mind slowly, he will still be utilised on the wings with Giroud upfront but more as a inside forward (I think that's what the name is, plays on the wings when defending but moves central in attacks when he wants) and sometimes alone in the front.
we just need another striker, am so tired of seeing giroud upfront.
Didn't watch the game and to be honest I don't fancy a line up with Giroud upfront, I feel bored usually... I don't like his turtle's movement, I don't like his hold up, I don't like his skill, I don't like his little flick, nor do I like his tongue gesture... Everyone is entitle to his opinion but I don't like those with comments polishing his hold up sh*t... and I'm an Arsenal fan with great passion... Wenger, you failed us big time in the summer not signing a good striker, hey don't say there's no one available because I don't like that too... At this current situation, play wallcot, Kos, sanchez or anyone (bar slow Mert) upfront and I would never complain...
Sanchez and Giroud upfront in a 442 with plenty of direct play and no tiki - taka could be deadly, just like Giroud and Griezmann at the Euros.
Sounds like Arsenal fans are settling cause we're sick of Giroud upfront.
Sanchez as RW and Perez or Giroud upfront.
did u guys see how Chelsea pressured manu in the last 10 minutes, 93 % possession against manu in the last 10 min!!!! we can not do that against a league 1 team as long as Cazorla is not there to hold the ball and with only Giroud upfront.
Walcott - Sanchez on either side and Giroud upfront might be what Wenger goes for..
Barely anytime on the clock, Giroud upfront, desperate for a goal, yet we still must play tiki - taka, which is the Wenger way.
I would play Theo on the rw and ox on lw with giroud upfront ozil behind them with lecoq and cazorla in the middle.
Walcott / Giroud upfront is not good enough.
hope No gooner is deluded enough to think we have a chance at the title with Giroud upfront if Alexis is truly injured on the long term, with Lucas n Welbeck still out we ll need a miracle to finish 4th.
I think our current play is best suited to Giroud as striker, we seem to put in a lot of crosses in final third but Welbeck or anyone is not always there to contact, but Giroud can be better in those situations, now we having Giroud back, put Welbeck on bench for some time (giving him rest, can bring on Podolski for him) play two strikers Pod and Giroud upfront.
It's painful watching giroud upfront especially for another year..
Giroud scored in our PL loss and Welbeck scored in FA Cup, but again I would play Giroud upfront and Welbeck on wing.
His pace also allows us to have more space in CM, opposition defenders can't step up as quick or as far compared to if we played Giroud upfront.
This makes us very easy to thwart especially with Giroud upfront
We have lampost Giroud upfront who cant do anything against good CB, no pace and no movement upfront and no finishing.
Iwobi deserves his starting role... the only person that can force him out is Alexis and that is if Mr wenger decides to start Giroud upfront
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z