The assumption that we need to
give a religion about 1500 years to stop being murderously exclusivists is nonsense.
Not exact matches
YOU DO N'T
GIVE A CRAP
ABOUT RELIGION OR BELIEFS — it's just your own particular flavor of insanity that you're all het up a
ABOUT RELIGION OR BELIEFS — it's just your own particular flavor of insanity that you're all het up
aboutabout.
At STEVE: It's not
about religion... it's
about the amazing Grace that Jesus
gave to us.
The Mormon church was not the only place to not allow blacks
Give your head a shake All Americans were a part of racial discrimination not just churches Making this
about religion instead of how Obama Failed is just stupid.
There is much that could be said
about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at
about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule
religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of
religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but
giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
Thanksgiving, a time to
give thanks for what we have is being quickly pushed aside in our desire to buy stuff for Christmas which is certainly not the true meaning of Christmas, who cares
about religion when I can get 75 % off.
who
gave you the authority to dictate what a
religion is
about??
Whether the critiques provided are correct or wrong, religious TV and media
gives us the opportunity to reflect on our way of life and talk with others
about religion.
Religion teaches people THAT crap
about the universe creator which is TOTALLY NOT what either the 10 commandments were
about OR what they are for or all
about and I can 100 percent prove it so religious people HATE me because... by God I do the 10 commmandment and since I do the 10 commandment and work so hard to always do the 10 commandment... YOUR burning in hell cause you broke one and SINNED... its is ridiculas... what
religion HAS done regarding what God
gave Moses... in the old testement.
Let me add I have not seen your 3 posts asking me
about how I feel
about it before now when I copied and posted those above and If I had seen before I would have answered you with out any hesitation but did not because I moved to other blogs... And to satisfy you interest my saying I do not like it as a cultural habit but if
religion failed to stop it and had to regulate it then what can I do
about it... people can still lie and
give you an elder age and how can you tell if 9 - 10or more at villages there are no birth certificate issued nor villagers interested to obtain it... what can you tell from their teeth like sheep??
So you're too stupid to
give some examples on a belief blog that focuses on
religion and people who are religious and that they speak
about god to
give me alternatives to different terms?
They do not care
about what they are doing in the name of
religion even if it means stabbing the country, which
gives them their livelihood, in the back.
I did after examining many
religions, too many to list but after being so discouraged
about the subject I decided to
give them a chance and could not find anything that could not be backed up by the Bible history and archeology as well as the false
religions that have misled so many.
The «Book» only
gives you guidance, tells you what you can do to get your own answers
about religion, but you still have to do your own work.
Then in 2015 Mr Page
gave an interview to the BBC
about freedom of
religion where he reiterated his original position, saying: «My responsibility as a magistrate, as I saw it, was to do what I considered best for the child, and my feeling was therefore that it would be better if it was a man and woman who were the adopted parents.»
President Obama was for it, before he was against it: first
giving a speech
about religion and our constitutional system so high - minded that it was audible only to bats» and then, as criticism mounted, hurriedly explaining that he wasn't actually lending his support to the project.
I don't
give a rat's azz
about the
religion any of the candidates follow.
They were upset
about land, and by creating this community, it
gave them power... I can easily see historically how through the nature of man this
religion formed... but, if one holds the Bible to be the account of the one true God and He speciifically states the word is God... and then goes on to say there will be false prophets... there you have it.
I love the way CS Lewis explained that ``... He (God) sent the human race what I call good dreams; I mean those queer stories scattered all through the heathen
religions about god who dies and comes to life again and, by his dead, has somehow
given new life to men.»
The arguments Cooperman and Smith
give about why polling
about religion isn't all that bad are quite familiar to those of us who follow polling.
The sad thing
about the Christian
religion is that it doesn't
give it's followers the blueprint or architecture of their souls.
The discussion
about the relationship of Christianity to other
religions has
given new relevance to a long - standing dispute between the Roman Catholic and the Orthodox Churches
about the relation of the Holy Spirit to the other two persons of the Trinity — the so - called «filioque» («and the Son») dispute.
Too bad there are billions of people around the world that don't
give a crap
about how your
religion defines marriage.
In the area of knowledge,
religion's weakness is not in questions it raises but in its attempt to
give dogmatic answers: Beyond the myths
about the origin, end and meaning of life, beyond the alienated notions of transcendence and death, there exists the concrete dialectic of finite and infinite, and this remains a living reality as long as we remain aware that it is not in the order of answer but in the order of question.
a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to
give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized
religions are no more than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver
about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)
To bad they have all that religious propoganda on there walls... Trust me
religion is for sheep... Every definition of god was
given by man... If you actually think
about it... They all can't be right!
President Obama was for it, before he was against it: first
giving a speech
about religion and our constitutional system so high - minded that it was audible only to bats — and then, as criticism mounted, hurriedly explaining that he wasn't actually lending his support to the project.
The example you
gave about your mother did you feel compassion for her or anger because what she did had nothing to do with organized
religion organization is unity
religion can be just religious until you began a journey with Christ.
No
religion won't stop violence, but it will stop violence in the name of some being that even if they do exist certainly don't
give a rat's backside
about anything going on here on Earth.
I don't
give a damn
about the candidates
religion.
Then light was liberated, and then gravity created the first stars and galaxies, then billions of years later, a local star went supernova and seeded the local nebula with heavier elements, elements necessary for life, elements that were not created during the Big Bang, then the sun was born, then the planets coalesced, and billions of years later some primate wrote a story
about how the Earth was created at the same time as the rest of the universe, getting it wrong because that primate did not have the science nor technology to really understand what happened, so he
gave it his best guess, most likely an iteration of an older story told prior to the advent of the Judeo Christian
religion.
while i do nt belive in
religion i have to say they do
give a certain point
about us not being able to know
I refuse to read the article based on the premise of the subject line and especially
given divisive nature of how CNN is / has been conducting itself as the so - called purveyor of truth especially int he field of
religion which it knows nothing
about but instead, chooses to try to sway readers» opinions based on a very secularist or antagonistic approach.
And there are still sects of this cult that secretly practice this pedo lifestyle!!!!!! And, most distressing of all,
given that we're talking
about someone who could become the most powerful man in the world, the Mormon church teaches that Mormons can lie if it suits their needs to impose their «
religion» on others!
Even better, by attending these classes could
give us a new perspectives and deepen our knowledge to learn
about our own
religion.
What they care
about is the excuse
religion gives them to control other people, assume un-earned power and authority and make money.
I think if you can believe that a virgin
gave birth and that a person was killed by hanging on a cross and got back up in three days, you can use
religion to justify
about anything!
and then they are excommunicated and the fight is over... this is a hopeless fight especially when
religion is involved... they either fight for rights and lose it all (and essentially go to hell) or
give in and listen to their religious leaders... I do not believe in what they do and could care less really but they are in a no win situation and they as nuns should not be worried
about birth control or anything of the such... they took the vows..
So, I don't think most people really think
about their
religion on a deep level, and that's okay... it
gives them comfort.
When people use their
religion as a cloak of immunity which they feel
gives them the right to spread lies
about another person's character, well that is just wrong.
But
religion isn't doing much either, except dividing nations and
giving people one more thing to fight
about.
Here is a link to a site that
gives quotes so that you can see for yourself what they had to say
about religion.
In a 1998 exchange with Placher in the Christian Century, Gustafson charged that postliberals never
give straight answers to questions
about the historical credibility of biblical narrative or
about the relation of Christian truth to the truth of other
religions.
The answer Berger
gives is an integral feature of his argument
about religion.
Nothing like a few shots of Petrone to really make me not
give a flip
about someone elses
religion.
[youtube = http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUeQXmYVamA&w=640&h=390] Dennett:» [not all, but for many, the dangerous thing
about religion is that] it
gives people a gold - plated excuse to stop thinking.»
And it's been great to recently hear my husband talk
about the lack of fear he feels since
giving up
religion over the past few years.
Regardless of what any of the Founding Fathers believed
about organized
religion, they felt that our rights were «God»
given, in the sense that they proceeded from Natural Law and existed a-priori, with no need of proof or precedent.
The point is is that it IS wrong to force someone not to talk
about their god, but that it is ALSO wrong to take money from someone who doesn't believe in that god by force (e.g., taxation) and then turn around and
give that money to someone who does to promote their views
about that
religion (such as funding a memorial with public funds).
Western society, while still
giving lip - service to
religion, has evolved past the point where (for most people anyways) a satire or insult
about jebus, the pope, or any other religious or political figure is reason enough to drawn down and start shooting.