«It's really exciting to
give access to justice for people,» he continued.
Not exact matches
Some
justices worried during arguments in April that a ruling
for the broadcasters could also harm the burgeoning world of cloud computing, which
gives users
access to a vast online computer network that stores and processes information.
The Time Warner deal, which would
give AT&T
access to content like HBO's «Game of Thrones» and Warner Bros» «
Justice League,» reflects AT&T's effort
to compete
for advertising dollars against Alphabet's (GOOGL.O) Google and Facebook (FB.O).
Still, we should not discount the significance of what Citizens United meant
for independent expenditures, something that
Justice John Paul Stevens argued comes close
to direct contributions: «The difference between selling a vote and selling
access is a matter of degree, not kind and selling
access is not qualitatively different from
giving special preference
to those who spent money on one's behalf.»
The suit was filed on behalf of two groups, the NYC Parents Union and the Partnership
for Educational
Justice, and essentially argues the tenure provisions
give students
access to ineffective teachers and ultimately hinders children the basic constitutional guarantee of being taught literacy, math and verbal skills.
E.D. Hirsch, Jr., has long been making the social
justice case
for giving disadvantaged children
access to the knowledge and language that have long been assumed by the privileged and powerful.
It's time
for the movement
to embrace an inclusive «Social
Justice Plus» strategy that aims
to give urban students
access to private, charter and suburban schools.
Access to legal aid is reserved only
for the very poorest, while the private bar is reserved only
for the very richest, leaving the vast majority out in the cold facing not only exclusion from the
justice system based on finances, but also based on knowledge
given the complexity of the legal system and the inherent difficulties of self - representation.
Recently, journalists from all EU member states raised,
for the first time ever, a joint voice before the Court of
Justice of the European Union (CJEU) against the refusal of the European Parliament (EP)
to give access, on grounds of personal data protection,
to information on how MEPs spend their allowances.
Failing
to acknowledge that this latter possibility is still very much alive is particularly problematic
given that, in some of your previous SLAW blogposts in support of allowing ABS, you have highlighted the emergence of the not -
for - profit ownership model of ABS, in the form of Salvos Legal in Australia, as proof that ABS can contribute
to improving
access to justice.
Already there, the Court was unwilling
to give direct effect
to Article 9 (3) of the Convention on
access to justice with regard
to Regulation 1367/2006 establishing an internal review mechanism
for EU administrative acts.
First, as a matter of normative priority, where regulatory change is sought
to be justified by potential
for improvements in
access to justice, it is arguable that it is the needs of the more disadvantaged and impoverished (people living on low income) that ought
to be
given priority consideration.
Across the country lawyers find the time
to participate in interesting and important pro bono projects that
give back
to their communities and aid in providing
access to justice for those who might not otherwise be able
to afford legal counsel.
In my work with the Canadian Bar Association's
Access to Justice Committee and the Association
for Canadian Clinical Legal Education, I have observed three major research opportunities
for law faculties that are not being
given the attention I feel they demand.
Otherwise, fired - up, redbull - fuelled participants are going
to work out that there is not much point in
giving their all over an adrenaline - filled weekend
to a process that is little more than presenting window dressing
for a concern with
access to justice.
The first - ever hackathon held during an ABA annual meeting, the event was a competition in which teams were
given two days
to develop technology that could help expand
access to justice for those unable
to afford or obtain legal services.
This is why the European Union has adopted its regulation (EU) no 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on online dispute resolution
for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009 / 22 / EC (Regulation on consumer ODR, and why mandatory ODR, no matter how it could be perceived by detractors, needs
to be looked at seriously as a way of
giving access to justice to those who,
for now, can't turn
to the courts since the costs associated with the legal process are simply prohibitive...
It would
give more people
access to justice and make the process easier
to navigate
for them.
``... The principle of fundamental
justice which recognizes that the lawyer is required
to keep the client's confidences — solicitor - client privilege» and «[a] client must be able
to place «unrestricted and unbounded confidence» in his or her lawyer; that confidence which is at the core of the solicitor - client relationship is a part of the legal system itself, not merely ancillary
to it»
given these two statements in the case of an ABS does this mean that non-lawyer owners / managers would be restricted from
accessing client files — in other words, who would «own» the information in a client file when a solicitor is working
for an organization with non-lawyer ownership assuming that the solicitor - client privilege doesn't apply
to the owner (s) or does this privilege apply
to non-lawyer owners as well?
He notes,
for example, that «much of our litigation is done on a contingency fee basis, and this is very attractive
for the public and
gives even the poorest person great
access to justice particularly from the tort bar.»
In a comment
to the recent post by Patricia Hughes,
Justice B. T. Granger of the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice referred
to a set of slides
for a presentation he had
given at the 2008 CBA Canadian Legal Conference in Quebec City entitled «The Future is Now: Improving
Access to Justice: The Need
for Lawyers and the Judiciary
to Go Electronic.»
Access is a timely issue
for Law Day
to highlight
given the recent comments of Chief
Justice Beverly McLachlin who received wide press coverage when she told a University of Toronto Conference audience, that «We have wonderful justice for corporations and for the w
Justice Beverly McLachlin who received wide press coverage when she told a University of Toronto Conference audience, that «We have wonderful
justice for corporations and for the w
justice for corporations and
for the wealthy.
Justice Nancy Becker Pro Bono Award of Judicial Excellence: Justice James W. Hardesty and Justice Michael L. Douglas This award is given in honor of Nancy Becker, one of the founders of the Pro Bono Project and a strong advocate for access to justice, to recognize a member of the judiciary who has given his or her time, energy, and influence to encourage pro bono work and support access to j
Justice Nancy Becker Pro Bono Award of Judicial Excellence:
Justice James W. Hardesty and Justice Michael L. Douglas This award is given in honor of Nancy Becker, one of the founders of the Pro Bono Project and a strong advocate for access to justice, to recognize a member of the judiciary who has given his or her time, energy, and influence to encourage pro bono work and support access to j
Justice James W. Hardesty and
Justice Michael L. Douglas This award is given in honor of Nancy Becker, one of the founders of the Pro Bono Project and a strong advocate for access to justice, to recognize a member of the judiciary who has given his or her time, energy, and influence to encourage pro bono work and support access to j
Justice Michael L. Douglas This award is
given in honor of Nancy Becker, one of the founders of the Pro Bono Project and a strong advocate
for access to justice, to recognize a member of the judiciary who has given his or her time, energy, and influence to encourage pro bono work and support access to j
justice,
to recognize a member of the judiciary who has
given his or her time, energy, and influence
to encourage pro bono work and support
access to justicejustice.
If you are interested in contributing
to one of the largest legal aid endowments in the country, please considering joining the
Justice Society, a planned giving program for those committed to ensuring access to justice in Washington in perp
Justice Society, a planned
giving program
for those committed
to ensuring
access to justice in Washington in perp
justice in Washington in perpetuity.
The Commission recognized the need
for effective
access to enforcement processes, stating «Even the best laws are mere paper tigers if poor people can not use the
justice system
to give them teeth.»
I had been asked
to give a speech on my own pro bono and
access to justice work with a view
to motivating students
to volunteer
for one of the many interesting projects PBSC is coordinating this year.
I do care about the rule of law and
access to justice, and technology
gives us reason
for some hope on both counts.
This facility is provided
for the private use of the EU supreme courts, the European Commission and the European Court of
Justice (using an identifier and a password) and
gives access to all the available databases and online translation tools.
Grace Pluchino, a community legal worker at the forefront of tenants» rights
for the past 30 years, is this year's recipient of the Sidney B. Linden Award
given by Legal Aid Ontario (LAO)
to honour exceptional individuals who help low - income Ontarians in the pursuit of
access to justice.
By responding
to the pleas
for help and providing equal
access to justice, each of you
gives back
to and strengthens your community.
«We are taking cutting - edge technology fresh out of research labs and
giving it purpose by applying it
to real - world problems of enormous importance
for access to justice.
June 8, 2016 — «Ottawa plans
to give the provinces more money
for legal aid programs
to help improve
access to the
justice system.
Previously it had been unclear how far the courts approved of third party funding, but since Jackson was looking
for ways
to increase
access to justice it is clear he had
to give it the green light.
The report
gives three reasons
for the inquiry: «a) legal aid is of pivotal importance as a vehicle
for access to justice, b) the proposals
for legal aid procurement were radical in the extreme and c) the reaction of the legal profession and other commentators was overwhelmingly hostile» (para 3).
The Forum is
giving also input
to DG Environment of the European Commission while developing proposals
for EU legislation with a particular relevance
for judges, as that is the case with the
access to justice proposal, the legal instrument on environmental inspections or when it is evaluating existing legislation such as the environmental liability directive.
The award is
given to an individual who exemplifies the Massachusetts Bar Foundation's goals of improving the administration of
justice, promoting an understanding of the law, and ensuring equal
access to the legal system
for all residents of the Commonwealth, particularly those most vulnerable.
The June 21, 1993 Lugano Convention on civil liability
for damage resulting from activities dangerous
to the environment, the November 4, 1998 Strasbourg Convention on the protection of the environment through criminal law and the June 23 and 25, 1998 Aarhus Convention on
access to information, public participation in decision making and
access to justice in environmental matters underline this requirement and
give the judiciary a central role in the enforcement of environmental law.
Another relatively large grant, of $ 194,322, was
given to McGill University's Paul - André Crépeau Centre
for Private and Comparative Law,
for a project
to produce «linguistic and legal tools intended
to contribute
to improving
access to justice in English in Quebec»
for jurists, law students and translators.
It is also a perfect opportunity
for the Supreme Court
to comment on
access to justice, a frequent and developing theme in speeches and papers
given by members of the Court.
Justice Sanderson rejected Aviva's argument and said: «For this court to let proportionality be the overriding, or even the predominant factor, would be grossly unfair to (Persampieri) and would be to reward the uncompromising, and — in the light of the jury verdict — unreasonable behaviour of the insurer...» Justice Sanderson agreed that insurers can pursue whatever legal strategy they deem fit, but added that, «especially where such strategies may have wide ranging and adverse implications involving widespread denial of access to justice, the use of such strategies should not be encouraged by the giving of cost breaks on foreseeable costs consequences.
Justice Sanderson rejected Aviva's argument and said: «
For this court
to let proportionality be the overriding, or even the predominant factor, would be grossly unfair
to (Persampieri) and would be
to reward the uncompromising, and — in the light of the jury verdict — unreasonable behaviour of the insurer...»
Justice Sanderson agreed that insurers can pursue whatever legal strategy they deem fit, but added that, «especially where such strategies may have wide ranging and adverse implications involving widespread denial of access to justice, the use of such strategies should not be encouraged by the giving of cost breaks on foreseeable costs consequences.
Justice Sanderson agreed that insurers can pursue whatever legal strategy they deem fit, but added that, «especially where such strategies may have wide ranging and adverse implications involving widespread denial of
access to justice, the use of such strategies should not be encouraged by the giving of cost breaks on foreseeable costs consequences.
justice, the use of such strategies should not be encouraged by the
giving of cost breaks on foreseeable costs consequences.»
They further represent a failure
to give patent litigants a fair trial, denying them
access to justice and trapping them in a forum intentionally selected
for its favorableness
to the other side.
This is particularly important where the funding situation is such that decisions made about which claims and other projects are
to be
given priority will have a great bearing on
access to justice for some traditional owner groups.
«While it is a very serious matter
for an organization
to depart from its established procedures
to deprive a member of services, in the particular circumstances of this case I conclude that TREB was justified in suspending
access to the MLS system by BNV and Mr. Beach without
giving them an opportunity
to cure the alleged breaches,»
Justice Brown said.