Sentences with phrase «give bad point»

Not exact matches

Peter Falvey, a managing director at Morgan Keegan, gave a light tough of analysis: «People are getting really excited, but it could end badly at some point.»

At that point in the run of «Breaking Bad,» Odenkirk wasn't even sure if the show or his character would make it to season three, given its low ratings and the fact that it wasn't yet at the top of pop culture conversations.

The worst thing you can do at this point is to give the discount, because then you've told the prospect you can't be trusted to offer the best deal.

It gives you «a resource to tap» in worst case scenarios, which will ensure you don't panic if the market drops 500 points in a day, she adds.

But no matter how many personal selling points they may offer to their constituents, our findings (along with many others in psychological science) suggest that the human mind gives preferential weight to the bad things.

And The New York Times yesterday pointed out that all of the $ 31.5 billion in new aid is not going to be spent on the Greek people any more than the American QE3 is spent here; it's going to be given to the Greek banks to help pull them out of their negative equity and all of their bad real estate mortgages.

Allocating unlimited resources can be daunting, and just as research has shown that giving workers too many 401 (k) mutual funds to choose from can lead to less and worse savings, unlimited vacation can overwhelm workers to the point that they don't use it to full effect.

This is a rather important ethical point, because the worst religious charlatans have exploited people's gullibility and desire to believe in miracles and especially miraculous cures in order to take vast sums of money from people who really can't afford to be giving any away, least of all to con - artists like faith healers.

Whiteheadians seem able to imagine such ecstatically spanned unities - across - time on the so - called «microscopic» scale of the «specious present,» but give up on the idea as the scope of the temporal disclosure space is widened to the scale of human lifetime and of generations.7 But worse than this from the point of view of Heidegger's temporal problematic, by submitting the ecstatic unities of their «specious presents» to the before / after ordering and metric properties of linear time, at least in terms of their mutually external relations and arrangements, they give back ontologically every advantage they gained from the use of an cc - static - temporal disclosure horizon in the first place, even though it was only the single horizon of presence.

They got progressively worse, to the point at which (at age 16) the maximum dose of over-the-counter pain medication still couldn't give me relief.

The impossibility of stamping «determinate sentencing» as good or bad in any given political climate points up the fact that reform measures ultimately depend on an informed, caring and articulate minority of citizens who can influence public opinion.

It's nut jobs like this that give christianity a bad name, which in my point of view is good, organized religion is evil, and the faster we get rid of religion the better this world will be.

There have been many other theories of atonement, each picking out what a given generation took to be the worst possible human situation and going on to affirm that in the action of God in Jesus, God met us precisely at that point: slavery to demonic powers, from which we have been delivered; actual slavery to human masters, with manumission accomplished in Christ; guilt for wrongdoing, with Christ as the advocate who pleads for, and secures, our release; corruptibility and mortal death, met in Christ with healing and eternal life....

His main point: it looks like interest - group politics, and thus gives license for bad liberal and statist - Republican tax policy incentives when the political winds shift.

I gave him the benefit of the doubt early on, even though every single person I have encountered, who is of the Reformed persuasion, has proven to be extremely capable of pointing out to everyone else where everyone else is wrong, and can do it in such a way as to give you the impression that, not only do they want to correct your erroneous beliefs, but also want to make sure you feel very, very bad about being completely wrong.

Don't fall into CNN or Fox Network lies, they don't care about God or your eternal salvation, just posting something so Ungodly like this is so Bad, (listen... Get close to Christ the redeemer of mankind) don't get into foolish arguments like this, Hollywood and all media is just the tipping point of the iceberg of something more evil happening, and to believers: get your doctrine straight and don't defend the works of this man (Stephen King) he is not giving glory to God with his live and work, there's many men of God that need your support that really give glory to God.

Many of the objections put forward by pro-life agencies in Britain against recent euthanasia Bills gave precedence to the «thin end of the wedge» type of argument, often pointing to Holland as a worst case example.

However, at least Merson does give the Gunners a good chance of turning over a poor United side he thinks are playing badly and heading for a good hiding at some point.

You can't keep giving up 120 - plus points every night and blowing big leads against some of the worst teams in the league and continue to insist that everything is fine, LeBron or no LeBron.

Final committee No. 2 Oklahoma gave up more points per game than UCF did and had a worse defense, according to both schedule - adjusted S&P + and the events of New Year's Day.

This should be important, because you've to assume that after a bad ATS year oddsmaker give them some point against respect the year before!

honestly hes not worse player on team, but i actually dislike him, i would kick his muller corner out of his hands, given us one good season an talked himself up for the rest of the time ian wrights report on theo was so on point, an he has had TEN YEARS

The Raiders were giving up 26.2 points per game entering Week 14, the sixth - worst average in the league.

The kind of «bad temperament» that is unacceptable is the kind that comes with a certain Balotelli, where he gets to a point where he doesn't give two shits about his team!

All u haters were bad mouthing him but gives u valid points about the need to replace Wenger.

It's as though he's starting to hit the downward slope of his career, and if Ronaldo is starting to decline, then that could be bad news for a Real Madrid team who still seem heavily reliant on their aging star, to the point that they gave him this massive contract extension.

I get it, there have been many bad things to the little things we can give him credit for, but you're just trying to invalidate every single positive aspect at this point.

It was a game the Cavs should've won easily — Cleveland shot 59 % from the field and 51 % from three — but the defense was so bad that they gave up 138 points to Minnesota and went to overtime.

Arsenal lost the game 2 - 1 after Olivier Giroud was sent off, but the bad news is that if the player is found guilty he will probably be given a suspension and fine, but there is absolutely no chance of the Croatian Champions being docked points or the game being replayed.

They have a shelf life of 8/10 years at the very top if they are lucky so who can begrudge them the opportunity to make hay whilst the sun is shining... am not saying Sanchez is not money driven but the way the guy plays i can mortgage my life he actually enjoys the game, enjoys wining first and foremost then money comes 2nd... like the author of the article rightly pointed out, he was in Messi's shadow at Barca and could not express himself fully, now he is at a club where he is the main man and given a free role and license to express himself and i very much doubt if he will want to go to a club like Madrid (as been rumoured in the dailies today) to relieve the bad experience he suffered at Barca because let us face facts, he is never going to displace CR7 as the main man, so even if Madrid sells Benzema or Bale to make room for him he will be back to the same position he was at Barca, this time he will be playing 2nd fiddle to CR7 so my guess is all the Madrid talks is been fed the press by his agents to drive a hard bargain when contract extension talks resumes.....

Also you are saying that a defense that didn't seem to give up any points the second half of multiple games and were nowhere near as bad as a lot of people on here like to make out is zero help?

It is particularly noticeable to me given that this team has played shockingly bad football all season, and the apologists for our bad football are the first to point to deficiencies in Rugani's game as if there wasn't a pant load of criticism to be handed out.

Also, for all the crap I give him he's substantially better than Wiggins, so I don't see the point in trading CJ for a worse, more expensive player.

with Man u and Chelsea, even at their worst we still struggle against them... hope we cam build on the spanking we gave them at the Emirates is all i cn say... just after Fergie left, when EVERY team was beating them home and away, even Championship sides they still managed to take points off....

SI looked at every season in the big four sports since 1966 — the Super Bowl era — giving cities points for winning (five for a championship, three for a conference title, one for a division title) while deducting one for a last - place finish, two for being worst in the conference and three for having the worst record in the league.

So despite being a massive 12 points worse off than we were at this point of last season, the Gunners went into the weekend just a point or two outside of the top four and with the likes of Liverpool, Man United, Everton and Tottenham not really giving us much to worry about.

The worst thing about the fixation on the rookie at that point was how it ignored the 100 other ways the Cowboys were giving the game away.

Merson isn't wrong on his point about Arsenal defensively though, as they've conceded 39 goals in 28 league games, giving them the worst defensive record of the top seven sides in the top flight.

Was not analyzing the Manchester ss and don't really care much there but from a footballing point of view and from the words of MR wenger I understand the logic I do nt read what the media thinks neither My comment above addresses the issues we face in comparison to the two previous seasons adding in our re enforcements The 22 million question «Are the Arsenal capable of achieving 85 point come next May???» I believed we were strong last year and said it here that the team was strong and together and used the very words that MR wenger used cohesion but as the season unfolded the cracks showed up at the very beginning when we lost to west ham and it got worse as we lost pole position and every thing around us came tumbling down by February last season here comes another important question did they know and understand what happened do they know what to do this term to avoid the very same faith well we wait and see Irregardless of what happens I will support Arsenal and will keep analyzing every match my way until May so Good luck Arsenal with your endeavors and hope you do well against Liverpool keep the fight on keep the heads up and give them a good beating

That is bad news for the Gunners and not just because it makes the gap to them nine points, but because it will have give them a big confidence boost and answered the question of whether they could win without Sadio Mane.

So what use, no points given for showboating ti bad.

there is some suggestion that wenger is backtracking on his fervent stance regarding what players would be staying at the club for the remainder of the season... some might deduce that this is all part of a much bigger, more elaborate plan... by shifting the blame wenger is attempting to, not so slyly, flip the narrative... by doing so he hopes to evoke empathy from his most ardent supporters, while attempting to rally any fence - sitters, whose faith was waning unless a more legitimate agent of blame emerges... unfortunately, and incredibly insulting to the fans, when wenger attempts to spin a tale and / or tries to eat his own words, he doesn't seem to play it all the way through in his head, so invariably gaping holes emerge... say we believed his version of the truth, would that not make him either an incredibly well - paid custodian of destruction or a spineless jellyfish because what manager worth his weight in salt would stay at a club that didn't give him final say after 20 years of supposed «success»... no matter the answer, neither bodes well for us... how ironic, in a way, since many pundits claim this team has lacked a «spine» for some years now... so whether we win, lose or draw on Sunday is frankly immaterial, as the problems will remain, and although it will be easier to digest if we left the Pool with 3 points, it might just be the worst result for the betterment of this club... a fact that both breaks my heart and baffles the mind

But weve been so terrible that at this point id like to see Jack given a go and paired with Elneny or coq, cant get much worse.

Anyway, my point is this: If we acknowledge that McGwire is a borderline Hall of Fame candidate, better than some Hall of Famers but worse than many others, should we simply ignore the fact that his illegal drug use, at a time when most of his peers were probably not using drugs, might well have given him a statistical boost, without which we wouldn't even be having this conversation?

I also wanted to point this out because the following wording gives the impression that it was just a one season of bad injury luck:

The defense was mostly awful against Virginia and WMU, then played well for three weeks, then gave up 27 points to Kent State (bad) and 37 to Miami (Ohio)(awful).

The 2 - 4 Jayhawks have one of the worst scoring defenses in college football, giving up an average of 49 points per game.

As if the five - place grid penalty wasn't bad enough, Ericsson has also been given three points on his licence for the incident.

Harden gave the Rockets a two - point lead with some free throws of his own, but then Williams gave the Blazers the lead with a three off a chaotic scramble started by a bad turnover by Jeremy Lin:

Worse, Stanford gave up 69 points in a loss at Texas and then was humbled 44 - 39 by San Jose State.