Sentences with phrase «give deeper thought»

Give thought to which interest groups and associations claim you as a member, and give deeper thought as to whether all of them do you proud on your professional profile.

What this therefore means that, thought they may seem untrue on first thought, analysing and giving deep thought to it will proove that it is true.

Give this some deep thought, friend.

After a really long, nothing - went - right kind of Monday, I can't really give this deep thought very much thought.

Those who professionally reflect on the meaning of literature give us deep thoughts about a category of stories.

I probably can't give you any deep thoughts why I like it other than that I believe deeply the potential of that country.

I don't fully understand your analysis but (without having given it deep thought) I think it might underestimate profits over time since you seem to be backing out a growing figure (per my chart 1).

Take the effort to give a deep thought regarding your investments, in order to make the most of it.

Apple too had to give a deep thought about the 3.5 - inch screen they used back then, and later the iPhone was made larger but the company never went above the 4 - inch size of screen in the closed environment and small portfolio of Apple iPhones.

I haven't given this deep thought, as I just read the question right now, but would like to share.

Not exact matches

Given the considerably deeper pockets of these tech behemoths, traditional media companies hoping to compete on scale should think twice.

Ideas, thoughts, as well as deeper emotional or «affective» states, are included in this category where the classical writers would place meditation, contemplation, and the various stages of «union with God» about which the mystics have given us reports.

Given a really deep insight into the concept of collectivity, we are bound, I think, to understand the term without any attenuation of meaning, and certainly as no mere metaphor, when we apply it to the sum of all human beings.

In my selfishness, I thought it was just between me and God.It took the situation with Alicia to wake me up to the fact that when we're not closely listening for the voice of God, we don't just miss out on the peace and joy we experience from a deeper relationship with the Lord; we don't just miss an opportunity to give honor and glory to the One who most deserves it; we don't just miss out on answered prayers God may have had in store for us — sometimes we miss the opportunity to answer someone else's prayer.»

Given the stunning turn of events last November, however, we need to suspend our economic faiths for a time to reorient our thinking about the economy around deeper truths regarding the human person and the role of work.

I think religion is more like a hamberger, wonderful to indulge in even if you know, deep down, that it's not good for you, and real easy to give up if you ever bothered to research how it's made.

So, I don't think most people really think about their religion on a deep level, and that's okay... it gives them comfort.

Can we lose that salvation i believe so if we totally turn away from him by rejecting the conviction of the holy spirit in our lives.I say that because as a new christian i accepted Christ into my life and the holy spirit was convicting me to surrender my heart to him as Lord and i was resisting him i would not surrender to him fully and so he gave me a choice to either accept him or reject him.I believe he gives everyone the chance to make that commitment as Lord of there life.When we make that deeper commitment and follow him he will continue to perfect us through his holy spirit so that we conform to his image.By the way i knew that if i rejected him at that point that was it he would never bother me again i would have been eternally lost the thought was terrifying at the time.There was definitely a spiritual battle being fought over me i was very aware i needed to decide which side i was on.Thankfully i chose the winning one.brentnz

America may well be the primal site of contemporary apocalyptic thinking, and it is America that has given us our purest and deepest contemporary apocalyptic thinker, D. G. Leahy.

Nevertheless, Kass is right, I believe, to think that none of the secular versions of immortality, the kind science might give us, can satisfy our deeper yearnings, assuming we have them as part of our human nature.

As I struggle with what I was taught in Seminary about Scripture, books like this give me hope that there is room for serious scholarship and deep thinking about Scripture, even if Scripture is not inerrant.

He concluded his statement by saying, «I think, I shall give my vote for integration with sadness of heart and the deepest misgivings because I can not see clearly that it is the leading of the Holy Spirit».37 F. Berkeli (formerly the mission secretary of the Lutheran World Federation) of Norway agreed with Max Warren and voiced the same apprehension about the administrative unity of the two councils.

This mere thought of taking time upon one's conscience of giving it time to explore with its sleepless vigilance every secret thought, with such effect that, if every instant one does not make the movement by virtue of the highest and holiest there is in a man, one is able with dread and horror to discover (People do not believe this in our serious age, and yet it is remarkable that even in paganism, less easy - going and more given to reflection, the two outstanding representatives of the Greek as a conception of existence intimated each in his way that by delving deep into oneself one would first of all discover the disposition to evil.

Think of the baptized life as one in which Paul can command certain deep emotions: «Rejoice in the lord always»; «Give thanks in all circumstances»; «Remember your baptism and be thankful.»

She herself followed a spiritual path alighned with American Indian belief system, but she expressed to me that Highe Pwer meant anything you Believe to be more powerful than you... after deep thought over much time I found that I believe the ocean was more powerful than me and began the path of giving over my poerlessness to the sea... been sober for 24 years and thay has evoved int not just the sea, but rocks.

And for many it validates their own strong sense that pastoral ministry does, in fact, require the very best they have to give — their best thought, their full energy, their deepest engagement.

But given our very pluralistic environment, in which you're likely to come up against five different worldviews in the course of a day's encounters with the media, you need a way of thinking, imagining and acting that makes deep sense, and that allows you to adapt and improvise in relation to these diverse views.

Because to lay hold of this deeper, richer joy, we're going to have to let go of what we thought we knew to discover what God wants to give us.

Covering subject's ranging from healthcare («I shudder to think where we'd be without the wide variety of prescription drugs to treat our maladies, such as think - shuddering») to the economy («Life is giving us lemons, and we're shipping them to the Chinese to make our lemon - flavored leadonade») to food («Feel free to deep fry this book - it's a rich source of fiber»), Stephen gives America the dose of truth it needs to get back on track.

His thinking seems to be consistent with the logic of emergence; and if there is present in the universe any deeper or higher ordering principle, it is through the kind of visionary consciousness Teilhard exemplifies that we would be given a sense of it.

I've given this some thought and thankfully, even while I was in Church, my communion with Source was deep and likely different than many.

Given this context in which Maximus» thought has been consciously advocated as an alternative to the «old» Thomist synthesis, Benedict XVI's words of praise take on a deeper resonance.

I think brown gives a much deeper flavor.

If you're going the wine route in stew, I think a red wide gives a deeper flavor.

She had initially thought the diet was crazy, but deep down, her intuition told her to give it a try.

At one point I thought about deep - sixing blogging, but that would've meant giving up sharing sporadic inspirations with you.

I think 442 with Laca playing a bit deeper is another option as two strikers mean both score more given the service behind them.

Cazorla — too bad he was lost too soon... not blinded enough to think he would solve all of our ills but he was and is the only deep - lying player on this team that can pass more than 12 yards on a consistent basis... like Rosicky, gone way too soon but can't dwell on it too long or we end up in the crazy world of Wenger's man love for the one and only Diaby... don't resign because even if he were to come back he's been out to long and he just gives Wenger an excuse to not replace with talent

So wait a minute.Are Arsenal looking for a defensive midfielder or a box to box player.I'm really disappointed in Xhaka's defending.He's very good with his long passing but I don't think he's the best option when it comes to box to box.In Arsenal he's normally used as the defensive midfielder particular deep lying playmaker and this actually means that we need someone who is fantastic at attacking and can also do very well defensively so as to compliment for Xhaka's defensive short comings.Ludo Goretzka is very good defensively from the little I've seen but I don't really know much about his attacking qualities.But I also hope Arsenal does not forget about Mario Lemina.He's a complete midfielder and to me has the capabilities to be one of Europe's best if given the chance.He can defend very well and attack very well.He's a player Juventus would regret selling.As for Goretzka I know he's very good defensively but have» t seen much of him in terms of attack.If he's as good as in attack I'd sign him.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Arteta I think would be a good player in that CM role next to him, or Cazorla if given instructions to sit a bit deeper.

They have a kind of game that gives you problems because they play very deep, very disciplined and that's why I think the turning point of this game was when we were 1 - 0 up.

Personally, I think he should start quite as deep as Rosicky does, to give him the space to run with the ball.

I think campbells rating is unfair truth be told he had a decent first half display and he would have scored twice, second half the whole team dug deep and gave little forward which is good considering we were defending a three goal lead.I agree with some of the ratings but I feel campbell, bellerin, podolski, chamberlain and sanogo put in a huge shift defensively and attack wise they deserve at least a 6 or 6.5.

This could be a great game for Wilshere to come back and I think he could excel from a deeper role, bench Xhaka and give him the fight to start in the team as he has been pretty regular in the starting lineup even if his form doesn't exactly warrant it.

Given that the single - deep safety couldn't cover AND there was no QB pressure, I think they had to play the secondary in soft coverage.

Ramsey has had one good season for us since his horrible injury, he needlessly gives the ball away much too often and his finishing is even worse than Giroud's... once again we have fallen in love with the idea of what could have been... Ramsey has only scored 2 meaningful goals in his entire Arsenal tenure: one in Turkey and the other in last year's FA Cup, which is not near enough to make him a centerpiece of this offence... likewise simply his presence on the team sheet has led Wenger into making horrible tactical blunders because he will force Ramsey into the lineup even when it doesn't make sense... just think of all those games when Ramsey was played out wide on the right, which forced the RB to come up into the play far more often, and deeper, because Ramsey invariably would find himself in a more central position leaving us far more vulnerable to the counterattack..

If you think they are giving up on analytics, please take a deep breath and explain why you think this, other than that it's the end of February and you aren't quite sure what else to yell about while there's no real baseball to distract you.

I think the first half was good — we were deep, like you need to be, and tried not to give them space or opportunities to score.

AS much as everyone says we hope to sign yaya I for one don't because arsne had him on trial 2 seasons ago and didn't sign him for bugger all so we won't be spending 12 mill on him and we shouldn't have any more african players as the afc is in jan and that's our bussiest time of year just think how bad we would of ended if ade went last year or toure got injured and when he did come back he was so tired and got thrown in at the deep end when senderos did really well considering the stick everyone gives him.