Sentences with phrase «give each part something»

«And the way parties manage coalitions is to try to give each part something it wants.»

Not exact matches

«I talked to him and asked him if he would give me some spare parts for something I was building called a frequency counter.

To make formal evaluations go more smoothly, and to eliminate any surprises on the employee's part, give feedback at the time something occurs to warrant it.

A charitable commitment at your office gives your employees an opportunity to be part of something larger, something that feels good.

Developers are bringing people back to brick - and - mortar shops by giving them something real: a memorable experience as part of a community.

Of course, I couldn't be that surprised, given that this is something I've been advising clients on for the better part of a year: it's hard to compete with Facebook, especially when you're in a defensive stance.

He was given no word on how he was supposed to go about boarding and securing a ship, something the marines hadn't made part of their repertoire for about a hundred years.

But it's hard to deny that there is something, sometimes, that happens when we travel, even as part of the regular hour - and - a-half the average North American spends doing it each day — a sense of dislocation, even in familiar places, that helps us notice new details about our surroundings or that gives a new cast to those we've internalized.

«Freemium» may be an ugly neologism, but the practice of giving something away and then selling a premium version of that product has been part of the Dead's practice for decades.

Gen Y tends to be attracted to smaller companies because the environment is more flexible, and they are more likely to be given additional responsibilities and feel like they are part of something in high - growth mode.

Given that backdrop, Mr. Carney said he would have no choice but to act if international investors continue to push the dollar higher - something they've been quite willing to do, in part because most analysts and investors are skeptical a central bank that hasn't intervened in currency markets since 1998 is willing to back up its talk with action.

It was the promise of Blockchain that drew her in; creating a more open world, leveling the playing field, giving people more control and freedom over their information, assets, and livelihoods, and the opportunity to take part in something that has the potential to change the world.

Crowdinvesting campaigns are similar to ICO campaigns, but the tokens give some part either in ownership of the company, or a share of profits, or something else the campaign creator decides on (it is different for each campaign).

And in case something happens, the HighLow broker takes part of their own money and gives it back to a certain amount so that individual retail traders are covered; however this doesn't include institutional investors.

Part of what you're doing in Lent is giving up something that's desirous in your heart so that you might in a very real way begin to get your mind around Christ giving up His life for us.

I wanted to be a part of that and give something back.

For the most part, we've been given two sets of unhelpful «rules» for what we should do with our sexuality: (1) respond to our sexuality as an appetite, like hunger, and feed appropriately or (2) avoid or subjugate our sexuality as something to be expressed only in covenanted conjugal relationship and ignored or sublimated at all other times.

While classification freed directors to use explicit language in marvelous films like Platoon and Something Wild and has allowed films like Out of Africa and Children of a Lesser God to explore the complex nature of human sexuality, it has also given us a series of slasher films — Friday the 13th, with its many parts; The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, parts one and two — and films like Brian DePalma's artistically significant but deplorably explicit Body Double.

After all that, it's an understandable move on her part, but Thompson at least got to use a replica sword as a real weapon, which gives him something to hold his head high over...

Remember, the parents themselves do not give the child his form (the spiritual soul) because they only contribute something material, namely a sperm and an ovum; and their own souls — being spiritual and so without parts — can not divide to provide a soul for their offspring.

«We're not a huge group of people but by coming together with people locally and joining up with the ONE campaign... it gives us a sense of being part of something bigger than ourselves.»

Being a part of a church plant has forced me to confront a vicious cycle in my life, a cycle that goes something like this: 1) I resolve in my head to live like Jesus in community with those around me, 2) I start reading Shane Claiborne books and memorizing the Sermon on the Mount, 3) I get overwhelmed by how impossible it all seems, 4) I get distracted by work and daily tasks, 5) I give up, 6) I feel guilty.

It can be argued that, although it may appear easy to identify given «free choices» that it seems could have been vetoed without harming the moral integrity of our universe, what must really be demonstrated is something that is much more difficult to establish: that the different world system of which such violations would be a part would in fact contain a significant increase in the net amount of good in comparison to the actual world.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

For my part, I will readily give help and counsel so that you may have something of the episcopal office after all.»

Finally I gave up and just settled that God would work something out, that somehow he would show me what Church is and what it should be and how I could be part of it somehow in a way that felt intellectually, spiritually and emotionally honest.

The Roman Catholic church maintains this position, recently describing the homosexual orientation as an «objective disorder».15 In Protestant and Anglican churches, a distinction is now often made between a homosexual orientation and homosexual genital acts; the orientation is part of some people's God - given make - up and not something for which they should be condemned.

No one should be required to assist in propagating the gigantic lie of religion by giving the illusion of taking part in a religious act or doing something out of respect for the lie.

I think the Vatican is going to give up on the Church in America because Americans demand accountability; something the clergy wants to part of.

(b) In vaster unities (absolute «world - soul,» or something less); and then our brains are organs for separating it into parts and giving them finite form.

This does not imply that the Spirit has been given to us only in part, that God withholds something of the Spirit from us here and now.

Prayer that becomes as much a part of life as making a mug of tea or opening up emails: something real, necessary, and done as part of daily life and given its due important place.

The health insurance provided by your employer is a part of those paid benefits giving their employees something in return for their work.

People yearn to be part of something real and life - giving, and I believe that they can rediscover and help create this in a church.

The heart of all real religions is an affirmation that human life on this planet is only part of something very much greater; that «human values» are determined by an authority higher than human beings themselves; and that man neither finds happiness nor discovers his true self until his worship, his loyalty and his love are given to Someone infinitely greater than any man or group of men.

@ Sabio I did not see a hole as it seemed kind of obvious to my eye that given how her hair was parting something was doing the parting.

Indeed, the other part — which I'm sure troubles Driscoll — is something that those who do social justice work have been noting for a long time: The Internet gives the powerless a voice like they've never had before.

And, with prices rising in Australia as they fall in other parts of the world, something is set to give.

But they would also love to be a part of yours, whether it's a bottle or two from their lineup of traditional wines being passed around your dinner table, or one of their Limited Edition Holiday Blends that you uncork with dessert, or give as a gift to a party host or hostess, a coworker, or someone who has done something special for you during the year.

«With Meat Free Monday, we believe we found an excellent opportunity to make a statement while at the same time give our customers a chance to actively and intentionally take part in something positive,» said Nordic Light in a statement.

I would often give her the bread as part of her breakfast, so I wanted to create something that would still give her a «toast - like» experience each morning.

-LSB-...] If giving up the cookies is not something that you can part with, I taken the initiative to track down recipes so that you can make your own version of all of the Girl Scout cookies, only healthier.

Winning awards isn't my motivation to keep taking part in these events — but it is something extra that I will always hold in the back of my mind when volunteering in order to give me that little bit of determination to keep going.

I think part of the boxing, whatever it is with his chemistry, the ADD - ness, that there's something about boxing that gives a great deal of immediate feedback.

When he joined the Seahawks, it put TCU on the map in my new city and gave me something to connect these two parts of my life.

While it remains to be seen whether or not this new role is something that the veteran defender is interested in, he cut an emotional figure on Friday as he couldn't hold back the tears as those in attendance at the awards ceremony gave him a long - lasting round of applause as part of a prolonged tribute to his time at the club.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

«I'm playing my part, but in the whole team everyone is giving 100 per cent, but I don't like to talk about myself and my influence, that's not something for me.

That's a big part of this, giving something back totennis and connecting with the fans.»

I don't think it's true to say that the structure was created around Arsène to give us robustness looking forward, it's really something that Arsène played a full part in.