Sentences with phrase «give everything i make»

(Though her preference, honestly, is to give everything she makes away... and something close to that might just be what she does!

I'd happily give everything I make away if I could simply live in exchange.

Not exact matches

I'm glad I forgave him and that I therefore gave him a chance to make everything right, which he did.

In today's digital retail, consumers are more empowered to make their buying decisions; and given the prevalence of social media in everything we do and say, those consumers are perhaps more influential than ever before.

Clear your workspace as you go through tasks, and give yourself a few minutes at the end of each day to make sure everything is in its place before leaving the office.

«We can't fix everything, but at least we can try to give it a chance and try to make things acceptable,» he said.

«And in example after example, radical notion after radical notion, Jay and Shel don't just make the assertion about something that challenges everything we thought we knew about marketing — they give readers chapter - and - verse examples that make the case for one simple concept after another that... well, could just revolutionize everything.

If you make $ 100,000 a year at your day job, pretend you make ZERO so that you give everything you've got to find other income sources.

Denton told POLITICO Media that he is not concerned about giving up some control to an outside investor — which is a reversal of virtually everything he's said for the past dozen years — because having to justify his decisions to someone outside Gawker would lead him to make better decisions.

He's giving everything he has to revolutionize transportation, energy capture and battery storage while making the safest, cleanest vehicles ever created, which the status quo said were impossible, and now all other car companies are chasing his lead.

But to make a comparison between Donald Trump's handling of Stormy Daniels (or his previous incidents of alleged infidelity) and the story of King David ignores the second — and most important — half of the story, as detailed in 2 Samuel 12, in which the prophet Nathan admonishes David, telling him that he has been given everything by God and yet wanted more, and took another man's wife and committed murder to have her.

Pfizer certainly doesn't want to give it away for a song, which Read noted when Pfizer released fourth - quarter earnings in late January: «We remain on track to make this decision, which could include everything from a full or partial separation to ultimately deciding to retain the business, during 2018.»

Given everything we've seen about this fund, I think it could make a find choice for investors seeking exposure to the crazy world of biotech but don't want to go about picking stocks for themselves.

Berger studied why some New York Times articles make the paper's own Most E-mailed List, why products get word of mouth, and how social influence shapes everything from the cars we buy to the clothes we wear to the names we give our children.

articles make the paper's own Most E-mailed List, why products get word of mouth, and how social influence shapes everything from the cars we buy to the clothes we wear to the names we give our children.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

I have absolutely no problem with Poligomy it is the whole «an Angel gave golden plates (which have never been seen) to Joesph Smith» thing plus the whole women as subserviant to men aspect of LDS and the «inner circle of MEN only in the temples running everything» that make it hard for me to accept.

If there is a God and there is just as much for as against, But lets say there is a God and he made everything Including you and He gets to make the rules because lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads too.

Stop making Jesus a hippie who accepts everything in the name of love and portray the Jesus shown in the bible: the Son of God who came to fulfill the law, die for our sins, love the people of this world enough to show sinners that they were sinning, and give us the ability to live freely and eternally if we ADMIT our sins and live in a Christlike manner.

Thus the traditional conception of deity, which we have received from our past, puts its main stress on divine absoluteness or aseity; on divine causative agency as the explanation of everything that occurs whether by direct divine willing or by indirect divine permission with respect to evil done in the world; on divine self - containedness and hence lack of necessary relationship with anything else; on divine impassability, which makes any suffering impossible for God; and on divine moral perfection, with the giving of laws in accordance with which everything should be ordered.

This requires a willing suspension of disbelief in our own language; knowledge and judgment and nuance, everything that makes the tongue a living spirit, must give way for a labored impossibility.

I want to add to this list my own expressions of thanks to those who made what might have been a difficult undertaking a rewarding one instead: Ruth Hopewell, who gave me the privilege of editing the book and consistently aided me in doing so; the Directors of Auburn Seminary, who granted a generous leave for my work on the project in Atlanta; Jim Waits and Elizabeth Smith, who anticipated everything I would need for the work to be done comfortably and efficiently; Lurline and James Fowler, who provided housing and friendship; Channing Jeschke, Candler's librarian, who made available and helped to arrange Hopewell's books and papers; Brooks Holifield, who worked with me on the last and knottiest problems in the text; and David Kelsey, on whose encouragement and sagacity I relied heavily when my assignment seemed most formidable.

We are comming we took you and made you we gave you food and tought you everything we give and we take away.

It is fascinating in itself; it throws light on every portion of the Bible; it clears up obscurities, explaining what is else inexplicable; it distinguishes the minor detours from the major highways of Biblical thought; it gives their true value to primitive concepts, the early, blazed trails leading out to great issues; and, in the end, it makes of the Bible a coherent whole, understood, as everything has to be understood, in terms of its origins and growth.

In pouring himself out in the form of a servant, and in living his humanity as an offering up of everything to God in love, the shape of the eternal Son's life was already sacrificial in this special sense; and it was this absolute giving, as God and man, that was made complete on Golgotha.

Lent makes me sad, I much prefer the Jewish Yom Kippur, just give up everything for a day and god forgives all your indiscretions.

As Sara Frankl, an amazing woman who spent much of her life homebound and yet made a significant difference in this world, said, «There is such pressure to do everything to its limits, when all you need to do is do everything to YOUR limit... to the limit God gives inside of you.»

The firmament crashed down giving us the oceans, the northern most point is kinda off,, and everything was made null and void.

It's silly, given how similar Emerson and Nietzsche are on nature as a condition in which nothing really is but everything is becoming, that the heirs to Emerson in this regard refuse to recognize the middle aged as existing in a state of becoming that makes young - versus - old analysis ridiculous.

This makes sense when we realize that everything we have has been given to us by God.

Even if at this point God in heaven and all his angels were to offer to help him out of it — no, now he doesn't want it, now it is too late, he once would have given everything to be rid of this torment but was made to wait, now that's all past, now he would rather rage against everything, he, the one man in the whole of existence who is the most unjustly treated, to whom it is especially important to have his torment at hand, important that no one should take it from him — for thus he can convince himself that he is in the right.

Atheism offers nothing to me, it never has and never will, it doesn't make me feel good or comfort me, it's not there for me when I'm sick or ill, it won't intervene in my times of need or protect me from hate, it doesn't care if I fail or succeed, it won't wipe the tears from my eyes, it does nothing when I have no where to run, it won't give me wise words or advice, it has no teaches for me to learn, it can't show me what's bad or nice, it's never inspired or excited anyone, it won't help me fulfill all my goals, it won't tell me to stop when I'm having fun, it's never saved one single soul, it doesn't take credit for everything I achieve, it won't make me get down on bended knee, it doesn't demand that I have to believe, it won't torture me for eternity, it won't teach me to hate or despise others, it won't tell me what's right or wrong, it can't tell nobody not to be lovers, it's told no one they don't belong, it won't make you think life is worth living, it has nothing to offer me, that's true, but the reason Atheism offers me nothing is because I've never asked it to, Atheism offers nothing because it doesn't need to, Religion promises everything because you want it to, You don't need a Religion or to have faith, You just want it because you need to feel safe, I want to feel reality and nothing more, Atheism offers me everything that Religion has stolen before.

The remainder of our group who have done a lot to raise funds have determined to give these groups everything we've made along with a «God bless you in your efforts,» type note.

Parents with economic means do everything they can to make sure their children succeed, and rightfully so, but they often do so while giving little or no thought to the consequences of their actions for other children in the system.

This was not due me praying harder to an invisable flying sky god or giving 10 % of everything I make to his church..

Can one ease oneself into true simplicity, or does one have to make a clean break and give up everything?

Like the way «god» gave the world «salvation» only tens of thousand of years LATE, we are to believe that «god» also gave us «medicine,» but only after we had suffered for TENS OF THOUSANDS of years AND only after we figured everything out ON OUR OWN??? That is one sadistic «god» to put us through all that deception... making us merely think it was solely by our own efforts that we could even... oh say, IDENTIFY things like heart disease and cancer and have even a chance to combat them.

Rather it is the key that encompasses everything, gives it meaning, interprets it and also provides its inner ethical orientation: making clear that it is to be understood and lived as tending towards God and proceeding from God.

It gives it body as well as soul, it makes it claim, as everything real must claim, some characteristic realm of fact as its very own.

He has since given many signs of his support for the present pope; when many of his episcopal brethren were doing everything they could to undermine the motu proprio establishing the right to celebrate the «old Mass», he made clear his belief that the rite of John XXIII «is not a relic, not a reverting to the past, but part of the living tradition of the Church».»

That was a very sly and passive - agressive way to make me a pariah and give yourself license to dismiss everything I write.

God wants you to be part of a growing church, and He has given you everything you need to make that happen.

To hear in it a call to dispossession is not to make it a rule that all Christians must sell everything and give the money to the poor.

While it does not make everything right or fair or even change the circumstances, it gives a moment of relief in an otherwise hopeless place.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

The sad one is what Rev. Moon apparently chose; the one at Matthew 24:48 about «that evil servant»; but Rev. Moon could have made it all to the crown of life: except for the fact he and all the members in the Unification Church tried to deny what I was told by my Angel when I was given the Word of God; yet Rev. Moon told everyone that the Word of God was where everything began and ended when dealing with anything in the Providence.

Since we are intellectualizing everything... Since the quarks allow atoms to adhere and not the body... is she saying she is going to be giving whatever she can to all extant things until the quarks that make up her body stop to cohere?

When you give everything a subjective aim, and make this apply right down the scale, you are using language which is very difficult to make intelligible, except in the case of what Whitehead calls «high grade organisms.»

Then he goes on to speak of «the God who made the world and everything in it, he who is Lord of heaven and earth,» and he proceeds to give a brief précis of Genesis.

I wept because I had been made to see, for the first time, that all the justice that must be shown the black man, all the help given him, everything that should be done legally to give him his rights, will never do what a simple act of love can do: make him know that he is accepted, cared for, yes, really loved by those who do not just «do good to him» but who feel with passionate concern that he is a human brother.