Sentences with phrase «give evidence for your claim»

And yet (with the exception of Bible prophecy, which I discuss below), you never give any evidence for your claims.

Not exact matches

We covered it during the 2016 presidential campaign, when Donald Trump falsely accused former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of giving away U.S. uranium rights to the Russians and claimed — without evidence — that it was done in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

For if we try to claim that God is present but can not give evidence of his presence, then God becomes incredible.

I don't mind them using their freedom of speech to lobby others to adopt their view, but constantly proposing spurious legislation with absolutely nothing concrete to back it up should be view the same way frivolous lawsuits are and those who can not give any evidence to their claims should be penalized for wasting everyone else's time.

The greatest crime is not to question or provide evidence to give justification for a belief or baseless claim.

The Shakespeare biography was especially skillful in working up a full - bodied portrait of the man from Stratford, given the (alleged) dearth of evidence that everyone keeps claiming afflicts the Shakespeare biographer; for under Honan's ministrations the evidence proved to be more plentiful than one might initially suspect.

Couple of points here, you claim god has given us his word and spirit, these are 2 assertions that you have no demonstrable evidence for.

Given current lack of evidence for proof of anything supernatural, will there be leniency for those who simply and honestly claim, «I don't know», granted there is a supernatural, and that the Christian God is the true God who did present us with an ultimatum to accept him or not, expecting us to wage the eternal fate of our soul?

Ministers at the DWP repeatedly claimed that the majority of people on disability living allowance (DLA) were given benefits for life without any supporting medical evidence.

Even if Alistair Darling had included the April qualification in his TV interview, how fair is it for the government to make the # 40,000 claim - given that the # 600 increased personal allowance is already very much in evidence in pay packets?

The News of the World said: «The New York Times story contains no new evidence — it relies on unsubstantiated allegations from unnamed sources or claims from disgruntled former employees that should be treated with extreme scepticism given the reasons for their departures from this newspaper.

Tarfia please do not make assumptions about my knowledge base and, if possible, try and base your statements with evidence rather than opinion and what you think — take a leaf out of John Ps responses — he gives us some figures to back up his claims — for example — how do you know how many people occupy the centre ground — what evidence have you got.

«The New York Times story contains no new evidence - it relies on unsubstantiated allegations from unnamed sources or claims from disgruntled former employees that should be treated with extreme scepticism given the reasons for their departures from this newspaper.

If the defense claims a judge erred in admitting certain evidence, rearguing that point in a post-trial motion gives the judge a chance to clarify the earlier ruling, which could make it harder for the defense to win the point on appeal.

Colleges make the claim — clearly refuted by the book's ample evidence — that giving racial admissions preferences enhances minority students» opportunities for academic and career success.

But the future isn't an entirely interesting idea to him either, evidenced less by his hesitant contribution to a heinous anti-space travel ditty («Please Mr. Kennedy») than his choice to give up any claim to royalties for quick pay.

This chapter's Innovative Practices in Action give glimpses into two districts, one in California and one in Alabama, that have transformed learning for students and have evidence to back up their claims.

If the «creditor» claims to have solid evidence of the debt but the «debtor» disputes that, the reporting agency will not attempt to determine who is right, but will give both sides a chance to state their case for anyone reading the report.

Can you give us a link to your comments hounding him for the «evidence» behind his claims, please?

You have given me a lot of verbiage and most recently a list of items, which I have gone through point by point to demonstrate to you that you have provided no empirical evidence to support the IPCC CAGW claim (as I outlined it for you, based on the AR4 report).

You've been presenting these accusations for months without giving the scientists involved a chance to defend themselves and their work because they don't know what your evidence is (in effect, no one has the foggiest clue what your claims are).

However, given that the CAGW position doesn't rest on specific numbers, but is instead an unorganized collection of anecdotal evidence, coupled with heavily - tweaked computer models, unfounded assumptions about positive feedbacks, and a healthy imagination about possible future disasters, a lower warming number for the 20th century will simply be brushed over with claims about aerosols being stronger than previously thought, more warming still waiting in the «pipeline» or similar ad hoc «explanations» that keep the overall story alive.

You are right to say that the fact that Lindzen's paper did not stand up to scrutiny does not mean that the papers which claim higher CS are correct, but ultimately people who claim that CS is low are not going to prove this by «auditing» papers such as Forests, they will only do so by publishing papers giving evidence for low CS which can stand up to scrutiny in a way that Lindzen's did not.

Another one of your disreputable tricks; no matter what evidence you're given, you always claim it's useless for policy, as long as the evidence supports mainstream climate science.

Subject what he says to the same scrutiny you would give to any other claim, but unless there is evidence, to impugn his motives is uncalled for.

When the curves of that figure are not interpreted as PDFs but as a summary of the studies shown the figure is a basically correct representation of the evidence claimed by those studies (except for Gregory 02, which gives actually inly a lower limit).

The criteria you gave aren't even measurable and even if they were they wouldn't support your argument because for whatever reason you've decided to make the enormous claim that the IPCC output is «dogma» which requires enormous evidence.

«This report gives the lie to the shale lobby and ministers» claim that there's no evidence of negative impacts for fracking whilst questioning many of the arguments made in favour of it,» said Daisy Sands, Greenpeace UK energy and climate campaigner.

I was a bit surprised that you have returned to post without giving us the list of the «multiple lines of evidence» you claim to have for AGW... but I digress...

There are many uncertainties in the science and the occasional finding that pokes holes in details, but claims that warming stopped in year X, there is an ice age imminent, etc. are given undue prominence when there is no real evidence for this sort of position, just as there is no real evidence that tobacco isn't a health hazard, or HIV doesn't cause AIDS.

John Pickering is Chair of the Civil Justice Council working party that produced «Guidance for the instruction of experts to give evidence in civil claims 2012».

In light of the Jackson Reforms, the Guidance for the Instruction of Experts to Give Evidence in Civil Claims has been revised.

Further, given the Respondents» evidence that they pay a flat - rate monthly fee, there is a need to provide evidence of how these charges were calculated for this specific matter while ensuring that the amounts claimed in the Bill of Costs are a reflection of the actual disbursements.

No HA 2004, s 21 notice requiring possession under an assured shorthold tenancy may be given during tenancy scheme non-compliance and the current accelerated possession assured shorthold claim form (the N5B) states: «If your claim for possession is in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy where a deposit was taken after 6 April 2007, you must provide evidence that such deposit is safeguarded with a tenancy deposit scheme... authorised under Pt 6 of the Housing Act 2004.»

BC Injury Law And ICBC Claims Blog Subjective Soft Tissue Injuries And Judicial Scrutiny Last year I criticized the often recited judicial passage stating that «``... the Court should be exceedingly careful when there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury and when complaints of pain persist for long periods extending beyond the normal or usual recovery...» and pointing out that these comments should no longer be used given Supreme Court of Canada's reasons in FH v. McDougall.

In the UK, the Civil Justice Council is proposing an online system for adjudicating smaller civil claims (up to # 25,000) without having to appear in person to give evidence.

In light of the evidence of the plaintiffs» own expert and giving the matter my best consideration, and recognizing that the process can not yield a figure of mathematical precision, especially in light of the conflicting expert evidence adduced, I conclude that the proper amount for the building loss claim is $ 325,000.00, being a fair depreciated value, and $ 50,000.00 for part of the cost of the new construction for a total of $ 375,000.00.

Prepared an Expert Opinion on the transfer of risk in a delivered contract and gave oral evidence before a civil jury in Houston Texas on a claim for damages caused by the loss of a multi-million dollar electrical generator entering the port of Houston.

Three witnesses, who identified the defendant as the gunman, claimed to be in fear for their lives if it became known that they had given evidence against the defendant.

Arm yourself with knowledge of how the personal injury claim process works, sufficient evidence to support your claim, and an experienced personal injury lawyer to give yourself the best possible chance of securing an appropriate settlement amount for your damages.

Thus the Supreme Court held that the policy of «deport first; appeal later» is a violation of human rights as an appeal against a deportation order by reference to a claim in respect of private and family life under ECHR, art 8 should be effective, and this means there must be an opportunity for appellants to give live evidence to assist the tribunal.

The state appellate court that heard the initial appeal refused to give as much deference to the defendant's employee's opinion that the road was safe, and it ruled that the plaintiff's presentation of the photographic and documentary evidence of the hazardous condition of the roadway was sufficient for her personal injury claim to be heard by a jury.

The weight that the court, in the exercise of its discretion under Rule 12 (6), gives to the loss of insurance coverage as a potential disadvantage that the other spouse may suffer as a result of the early severing of the claim for divorce depends on the evidence in the particular case.

It is very common for ICBC brain injury claims to include opposing medical evidence and numerous «lay witnesses» who give evidence of changes in a Plaintiff's level of functioning after the accident.

It is worth pointing out that the costs associated with Private MRI's can be recovered in a personal injury claims if a medical practitioner gives evidence that the expense is reasonably incurred for a valid medical purpose related to the claim.

In the context of a historical claim for status, the Court said, it is sufficient for the claimant to provide some evidence giving rise to the inference that the unknown father has status, as long as there is no evidence to the contrary.

Therefore, in the circumstances of a historical claim such as this one, it is sufficient for the claimant to provide some evidence capable of giving rise to the inference that an unknown father may have had status, which constitutes sufficient proof of paternity for the purposes of the legislation, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary.

Three witnesses (the only witnesses in the case who had identified the appellant as the gunman) claimed that they were in fear for their lives if it became known that they had given evidence against Davis.

There is, for example, some evidence that a greater number of gay people as opposed to straight people smoke and this could potentially give rise to a claim.

The great advantage claimed for the practice of «hot - tubbing», a procedure that allows experts to give their evidence concurrently and for judge - led «discussion» of the expert issues, is that it saves time.