Sentences with phrase «give false witness»

They hung around for four hours until she came home, and she felt obliged to give a false witness statement.

Speaking about the matter for the first time since Parliament brought a closure to it, Alhaji Muntaka insisted that he doubted if there was any true Muslim who would want to give false witness knowing the consequences and gravity of it in Islam.

Not exact matches

The one place where the word «tahat» isn't used in in the 2nd case which deals with a witness who gives false testimony.

He reviews the commandments of God as they are given in the Decalogue: «You shall not kill, You shall not commit adultery, You shall not steal, You shall not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother.»

To give ground in these circumstances» to act as though everything is normal and fine» bears a false witness, and over time becomes equivalent to denying the moral truth of the matter.

«To bear false witness» is to give false testimony in court (the word in the text is literally «to answer»).

To bear false witness is to give false testimony in court.

This type of test (Snap, Abaxis, Witness, other «chair - side» tests) can give false negatives if fewer than four adult female worms are present.

Three general indicators of threshold reliability justifying admission of a statement include «(i) the statement is made under oath or affirmation following a warning on the significance of the oath and the availability of sanctions for giving a false statement; (ii) the statement is videotaped in its entirety; and (iii) the opposing party has a full opportunity to cross-examine the witness respecting the statement» (at para. 32).

At common law, you can't sue a witness for giving false evidence.

In these cases, even if the protection against self - incrimination in section 13 of the Charter applies — which provides that «A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence» — the SKCA held that prior false statements are admissible where the deceit is the substance of the offence, regardless of whether it was «incriminating evidence» or related to «perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence» (Staranchuk SKCA at para 5).

-- The prenup is not in writing: For a prenuptial agreement to be valid, it must be a written document, witnessed by outside parties — At least one party provided false information: The inclusion of untruthful information or even incomplete information will render a prenuptial agreement invalid — Pressure, duress or coercion: If one party forces the other to sign a prenuptial agreement, regardless of whom the document most benefits, it will be invalid — The prenup was not read: If one or the other spouse does not read the prenuptial agreement, it is possible the document could be challenged — Improper execution: To be valid, the agreement must be read and signed by both parties before the marriage occurs — Gross unfairness: While a prenuptial agreement gives the couple a great deal of flexibility in how they establish financial rights, the court may decide not to enforce the prenup if it is grossly unfair to one of the parties