Sentences with phrase «give judicial authorities»

Not exact matches

All personal data benefits from this full protection and will only be disclosed to third parties such as administrative or judicial authorities if the Saxo Bank Group is compelled to do so pursuant to the applicable law, or if the registered has given its written consent to such disclosure.

Again, no one is claiming that Thomas's position is identical with Scalia's, but, given what the great Catholic theologian had to say about the limits of judicial authority in reference to the written law, his position is far closer to that of the late justice than to the idea of a «living» or «evolving» Constitution so ubiquitous today.

«Should the legislature attempt to comply with these broad directives, even if it were to be given time extensions, by enacting new legislation, then it would have made these broad changes based solely on the views of a single Superior Court judge, without review or consideration by higher judicial authority,» the appeal says.

The 10th Circuit Judicial Council found that the law governing judicial misconduct did not give it the authority to review alleged conduct that occurred before Roberts became Judicial Council found that the law governing judicial misconduct did not give it the authority to review alleged conduct that occurred before Roberts became judicial misconduct did not give it the authority to review alleged conduct that occurred before Roberts became a judge.

Any person who issues a decision, gives an opinion, submits a report, addresses a case or proves an incident for the benefit or against a person, failing to maintain the requirements of integrity and impartiality, in his capacity as an arbitrator, expert, translator or investigator, appointed by administrative or judicial authority or selected by parties, shall be sentenced to temporary imprisonment.

As it did in 2012, Florida's house of representatives has proposed giving the governor greater authority over the membership of the state's judicial nominating commissions.

He added: «Turkey's own Constitution states that judges «shall be independent in the discharge of their duties... No organ, authority, office or individual may give orders or instructions to courts or judges related to the exercise of judicial power».

The purpose of judicial review is to ensure that public authorities don't go beyond the powers given to them by parliament and that they don't abuse those powers.

Lord Justice Lloyd Jones held that «While I readily accept the fundamental importance of the guarantees provided by Article 5, it does not follow that Article 5 must be equated for all purposes with Articles 2, 3 and 4... In the present state of the Strasbourg jurisprudence, enforced disappearance cases are acknowledged to give rise to an investigative obligation because where agents of the State have assumed control over an individual it is incumbent on the authorities to account for his or her whereabouts... I can see no reason in principle why it should be extended to all cases in which a person has been detained in the absence of judicial scrutiny or control, even if the detention is not secret or unacknowledged.

Yet given the reality that Parliamentary conduct may not always be responsive to the needs of justice (at least not without judicial prompting), it might be queried if the anti-exceptionalism of Robinson's reasoning towards public authorities cuts off a prospective means for inducing legal innovation.

One such trend that was popular several years ago was an effort to expand gubernatorial authority over the process, by allowing the governor to choose more members of the judicial nominating commission and giving the governor more nominees from which to make appointments.

To the extent that this purported to give the Parenting Coordinator final decision - making authority, it was an impermissible delegation of the court's judicial role.

The Judicial Council concludes that the Act does not give the Judiciary authority to review that conduct,» the council wrote.

This dicta by the Supreme Court in Hardesty did not discuss the effect of SCR 4.020 (1)(d) which gives the Judicial Conduct Commission «the authority to refer any judge of the Court of Justice who, after notice and hearing is found by the Commission to be guilty of misconduct, to the KBA for possible suspension or disbarment from the practice of law.»