Sentences with phrase «give less warming»

Studies using the more recent, instrumental, record tend to give less warming than the others.

Not exact matches

Catholics today are encouraged to give up for Lent «favorite things» that are often less tangible than «whiskers on kittens» and «warm woollen mittens.»

when they warmed his body and gave him oxygen on the way to the hospital he woke up, everyone screamed it's a miracle... then science had to step in and explain it wasn't a miracle, the temperature of the water lowered his core temperature so low that his body required less oxygen, thus he didn't recieve enough brain damage to cease funtioning.

Contrary to popular believes, roasting «does not» alter the amount of caffeine in the bean, but does give less caffeine when the beans are measured by volume because the beans loose density during warming.

If you really want to give your baby a warm bottle, put it in a bowl of warm water — and you will have one less item you'll need to sell at a future garage sale.

They found that for only four issues did Republicans give less than a midpoint score of 5: global warming (4.8), evolution (4.4), gay adoption (3.9), and mandatory health insurance (3.5).

Despite the strong warming trend of the past 15 years, worldwide temperatures have risen less than models predict, given the build - up of carbon dioxide in the air to 25 per cent above pre-industrial levels.

«This kind of study discusses the natural cycle and could help define the likely positive feedbacks we can expect in the long - term future, [for example] as temperatures warm, the ocean will want to give up more CO2, or rather absorb less,» says climatologist Gavin Schmidt of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies.

If countries stick both to the spirit and the letter of the agreement, it could give us a good chance of limiting global warming to less than 4 °C above pre-industrial levels and perhaps even less than 3 °C.

I can understand that approaching equilibrium takes a long, long time, while TCR gives a better measure of what will happen over the next few decades (and that technology and society may be very different in 200 years time); but on the other hand, I thought nations had agreed to try to limit global warming to less than 2 degrees C overall, and not just to limit it to less than 2 degrees C by 2100.

Because your cardiovascular system pumps less blood to your extremities in cold temperatures, a proper warm up gives your body the ability to elevate your heart rate and raise your internal temperature before hitting the field.

Likewise, if you used to enjoy a warm cinnamon roll every morning but have given that up to be healthier, then there is a big chance that your new morning granola regimen is less than satisfying.

It's officially summer but somehow this year, there's no summer in Finland and who knows if it will ever decide to stop by because it's been so cold for so long now that I have already gave up the idea that it will ever warm up so I'm anxiously waiting for my summer holidays which will start in less than 2 weeks.

I'm going to give it another shot, one that's somewhat less tricked out, just to see if I can get warm again.

So I can't do anything less than give it my warmest recommendations.

The PTC heating element is required because, due to their high thermal efficiency, the sophisticated CDI and CGIengines are very economical on fuel and, therefore, give off much less heat to warm up the coolant than conventional engines when running under partial load.

If your dog digs in an attempt to keep warm, provide an insulated dog house, give her extra blankets or a differently shaped bed that she can burrow into, move her bed to a cozier, less drafty location, or give her access to an area where she can lie in the warm sun.

She takes a bit to warm up to new people but given her past, we would expect no less.

In the case of this summer, to make it familiar, the NE North American Coast and most of Canada is cooler by extensive periods of cloud coverage, cooling caused by this region clashes with the US South extreme heat, given less bouts of clouds up North, the North American warming record would have been amazingly strong, but permanent cloud episodes over one region or another travel, never last forever, as such not causing a permanent shift in the temperature record (unless the clouds cover or not wide swats of the Polar regions).

A regional warm period and the LIA gives you less than two data points.

But the skewed nature of the distribution of possible sensitivities means that it is much more likely that 450 ppm will give us more than 4.5 °C of global warming rather than less than 2 °.

Obvious, this gives a perception that warming in the Arctic is much less severe then it actually is.»

Steve, if the laws of thermodynamics still hold, then a net extra loss of 3 W / m2 (top of atmosphere) should give more cooling (or less warming, dependent of the absolute values).

But that gives less than 1 C warming without feedbacks.

Here's the most important line from Annan's Dot Earth comment, in which he notes how recent events point to less warming from a given buildup of carbon dioxide:

Given that the warming then is less than that predicted for this century, is that what we can expect for Africa's future?

But if the optical thickness in that band is sufficiently smaller than in another band (depending on wavelengths), adding some absorption to the optically - thinner band would tend to result in warming of the colder layers (as there would be less temperature variation over height in radiative equilbrium for that band, given the same surface (+ tropospheric) temperatures.

I just explained, a present condition of a significantly lesser solar input giving a warmer (more than ten days) climate.

The idea that large numbers of people are voluntarily going to give up the travel or limit their diet for something as someday vague as global warming is positively inhuman, much less the millions that would have to forgo the life of comfort that we see as a floor for existence in the West.

The 47,000 wildfires last year may seem like a very large number — and it certainly gives global warming alarmists like Brown plenty of fodder for misleading global warming claims — but the 47,000 wildfires was less than half the average number of wildfires that occurred each year in the 1960s and 1970s.

bozzza - The differences in the Arctic are perhaps 1/4 the ocean thermal mass as global ocean averages, small overall size (the smallest ocean), being almost surrounded by land (which warms faster), more limited liquid interchanges due to bottlenecking than the Antarctic, and very importantly considerable susceptibility to positive albedo feedbacks; as less summer ice is present given current trends, solar energy absorbed by the Arctic ocean goes up very rapidly.

And, given the fact that the amount of kinetic energy needed to raise temps by 1C in the Arctic is far less than needed to raise by 1c at lower latitudes, is not the cooling far more significant than the warming?

One result is that in their efforts to provide «balanced coverage,» U.S. media have given disproportionate attention to the skeptics, creating the impression of less scientific consensus on global warming than exists within the mainstream scientific community.

The 2009 State of the Climate report gives these top indicators: humans emitted 30 billion tons of of CO2 into the atmosphere each year from the burning of fossil fuels (oil, coal, and natural gas), less oxygen in the air from the burning of fossil fuels, rising fossil fuel carbon in corals, nights warming faster than days, satellites show less of the earth's heat escaping into space, cooling of the stratosphere or upper atmosphere, warming of the troposphere or lower atmosphere, etc..

Some shift in Americans» global warming views might have been expected this year, given the near - record warm temperatures experienced this winter across much of the country — Gallup finds 79 % of Americans reporting that the weather in their area was warmer than usual, though less than half of these attributed this to global warming.

This is an interesting concept given the fact that over 70 % of the earth is covered by water which implies that increased amounts of CO2 are less likely to cause any amount of noticeable warming.

Given how global warming from CO2 is delivered prefentially over land, high latitudes, in the winter 1.1 C should be quite welcome even before considering that plants will grow faster using less water and have a longer growing season in which to do it.

Give me at least 20 year periods with warming trends less than 0.05 C per decade from a majority of the available data sets and I will call it a trend and then and only then discuss what to make if those trends continue for another year.

The climate alarmists have exploited the public's understandable lack of knowledge concerning climate science to argue that the developed countries (but usually not less developed countries) should give up some or preferably all fossil fuel use in order to avoid alleged catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW).

However, the fact that trees are generally darker than most other land coverings means that forested parts of the Earth's surface reflect away less incoming solar radiation, giving forests a warming effect.

Given that «causes of the earlier warming are less clear ``, our understanding of Earth's climate system is rudimentary at best, and our historical record is laughably brief, it is confounding how the IPCC can be so «extremely» sure «that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century», which is «not statistically significantly different» from the natural warming that occurred between 1910 — 1940.

Even if natural gas combustion creates approaching 50 percent less CO2 equivalent per unit of energy produced, an amount which is well beyond best case on ghg emission reductions, it will not create the much greater emissions reductions necessary in the next 30 years to give any hope of limiting warming from exceeding levels that will cause catastrophic impacts.

If something is cooling to a lesser extent then is it not warmer at any given time than it would otherwise have been?

And 2 ˚C is far, far too high, given the now clear evidence that at less than 1 ˚C of warming we are already on the precipice of climate catastrophe, from the Arctic to the Great Barrier Reef, from the Himalayas to Siberia.

The emissions initially give a small increase of CO2 in the atmosphere (= more pressure), which is counteracted by less natural emissions (from the warmer oceans) and / or more natural sinks (in colder oceans and vegetation).

The pre-Holocene climate shifts seem to be well accounted for by dynamics of glacial meltoff, freshwater discharge, and the impact on the ocean circulation... all of which is less of an issue in an initially warm climate, and the AR5 generation models give no indication that the overturning circulation will be significantly impacted over the coming century.

Polar bears are one of the most sensitive Arctic marine mammals to climate warming because they spend most of their lives on sea ice.35 Declining sea ice in northern Alaska is associated with smaller bears, probably because of less successful hunting of seals, which are themselves ice - dependent and so are projected to decline with diminishing ice and snow cover.36, 37,38,39 Although bears can give birth to cubs on sea ice, increasing numbers of female bears now come ashore in Alaska in the summer and fall40 and den on land.41 In Hudson Bay, Canada, the most studied population in the Arctic, sea ice is now absent for three weeks longer than just a few decades ago, resulting in less body fat, reduced survival of both the youngest and oldest bears, 42 and a population now estimated to be in decline43 and projected to be in jeopardy.44 Similar polar bear population declines are projected for the Beaufort Sea region.45

The observed rate of warming given above is less than half of this simulated rate, and only a few simulations provide warming trends within the range of observational uncertainty.

(IEA, 2012) Even if natural gas combustion creates a 50 percent less CO2 per unit of energy produced, an amount which is beyond best case on ghg emission reductions, it will not produce the greater emissions reductions necessary in the next 30 years necessary to give any hope of restricting warming to potentially catastrophic levels.

When they say 28 % less CO2 that puts it back to the pre-industrial value near 280 ppm, which is where it has been for the past millennium, give or take 5 ppm for warmer and cooler periods.