Sentences with phrase «give me more money so»

On the day after Espada's conviction Soundview lawyers went to court to try and force the New York State Health Department to give it more money so it won't have to close its doors.

She has now gone back to say please give me more money so that I can apply for a permanent care order.

Not exact matches

Firstly, because it means higher interest rates — so when companies try to borrow money, that money will become more expensive and as a result they will have less room to give returns to investors.

Look for more money to be given to the Canada Revenue Agency to fight offshore tax evasion, an investment that has so far helped the CRA reap millions in extra tax dollars while at the same time achieving the aim of discouraging tax evasion by Canadians.

Rather than just giving people money we should develop ways so that you can earn more money if you do certain things that are good for you and maybe good for society.

So it could decide simply to give employees more money.

So no one will give you more money and you go out of business.

But the FBI's and CFTC's theory here is far more troubling: It suggests that existing algorithms are not just dumb enough to give spoofers some of their money, but dumb enough to give spoofers so much of their money that they destabilize the financial markets.

«If you liked my company last year so much why don't you just give me more money to get through «Winter?»

So the more money you go and raise when you don't have any revenue yet, as people observe if they ever watched Dragons» Den or Shark Tank, is the more of the business you give up — because they say well, your business has no value.

They collect their interest in advance, so to speak, but they also hope you'll hang around and give them more interest money later on, too.

So I don't think it's a surprise that when Donald Trump gets up and says, «I'm going to give you free benefits and I'm going to get rid of the rules, that I'm going to unshackle banks so that they can make more money again'that they're value would go up.&raquSo I don't think it's a surprise that when Donald Trump gets up and says, «I'm going to give you free benefits and I'm going to get rid of the rules, that I'm going to unshackle banks so that they can make more money again'that they're value would go up.&raquso that they can make more money again'that they're value would go up.»

Doing so will give you an opportunity to not only save more money, but boost your Social Security benefits by delaying your filing past full retirement age.

The event production company was struggling and Raja needed more money to keep it going, so he decided to continue knocking on doors, but instead of giving the jobs to the landscaping company, he decided to do the job himself.

I wonder if more of the evangelical right new about what's in those Romney tax returns that could be so damaging wether they would be so willing to give him their money.

It is no ones business and preachers love to act like they have the answers to heaven and hell so people will keep giving their hard earned money and feel so guilty that they should be giving more.

@@@@@ WIMPY WASP explained it when earthquakes and floods and famine hit really hard then most crazy broke really religious people who don't have a job go crazy like you.you religious people don't give back in my last three years I given back too helping the poor more then $ 20,000 dallors of my own money how much you so called chicken heads crazy religious people given out of your own income wait you crazy religious people got ta pay your light bill.by the way I own my own commercial health base buisness in Arizona.you still working for a pay check I write employees paychecks.

Sister Sledge wonders why he's the greatest dancer, and given what the great Albert Murray says in Stompin'the Blues about the likes of Louis Armstrong and Miles Davis, they are right to so wonder — dancing ability often is a sign of musical intelligence, and is often linked with good fashion sense, even if the latter is a more surface sort of excellence, in that it obviously requires the money and leisure to purchase the clothes, or as Aristotle might say, the «equipment.»

A recent sermon on stewardship insisted, apparently in all seriousness, that the church didn't need any more money or volunteers, so giving of time or money should come only out of genuine gratitude.

So if you do give a lot to charity (more than $ 5800 per person), then you can itemize and are deducting for money that actually left your pocket.

And, as though this foreigner had not already done so much more than enough, the story continues that «on the morrow when he departed, he took out some money and gave it to the host and said to him, «Take care of him and whatever more you spend, when I come again, I will repay!»»

Second, do you wonder why Evangelicals have so much money and that $ 100 million is just the money sent to israel; we give more to charities in the US.

Today is a great day to give me your MONEY so I can buy even more gel to put in my hair.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

These «prosperity gospel» preachers have a few motives other than the milk of human kindness... prosperous followers have more money to give to the churches, and unfortunately, money is power, so the churches will wield more of it as a result.

I was talking to a person if he went to church and he stated all they want is your money.You got to give your money to read books about GOD, I mean like thirty dollars and more and the same for a dvd or like if you could give 1,000 or more to keep on the air.He and I both think we are better off stay at home and read the Bible and study it.I think if you are born with the new sperit of GOD you will understand the Bible without the loss of great somes of money.After they sell so many dvds it becomes 100 % profit and they never lower the price so can obtain one.For this is wrong, it states in the Bible that this would happen preachers for money to learn about everyones GOD.They forgot one thing JESUS never forced money from you to hear the wordof salvation Im a follower of JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD He is the way.Im not a so called Christian just.

We have a higher quality of product so, yes, we spend the money and give our guests more than what they expect and exceed their expectations.»

She gives so much more information than just recipes and also includes recipes to make your own mixes, which ultimately saves time and money.

There are so many other brands that we can enjoy and that give better return for our money more immediately.

This window is especially interesting given all the drama of the season so far, Martin O'Neill and Alan Curbishley get their hands on some real money for the first time in their managerial careers, Chelsea get to address apparent squad depth problems, Manchester United can try to sign someone who isn't super old, and we're guessing Harry Redknapp is going to pick up a couple more dodgy deals for Portsmouth, while Reading, Sheffield United and Watford will hopefully spring a surprise or two.

We don't really have the money, we are not a big club in comparison any more, the football world has left Wenger behind and MOST OF ALL the board don't give a shit so long as they make the shareprice ect.

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

I have not handed a single penny over to Arsenal FC since Silent Stan took over and I will refuse to give anything of mine to that yank, he has more than I can dream of obtaining so he doesn't need my money or your money.

He could give a tuppence f@ck about the success of am «English soccer team» So with this in mind you have to remember that success on the pitch is absolutely the last thing that the board is after, Sanchez WILL be sold because A) he want far more money than the board are willing to pay him and B) he knows that the club are NOT seeking to up Thier game or compete on a higher level.

All of Wenger's disastrous plans when it comes to transfers, both incoming and outgoing, are coming home to roost... why would anyone pay a significant fee for a player that was hardly used, is overpaid and has a spotty injury record; not to mention the fact that Wenger nickels & dimes everyone when it comes to transfers so it only makes sense that other teams would do likewise when dealing with us... the fact is I wouldn't be surprised if Wenger does this so that players won't be moved thereby giving him a ready - made excuse not to spend more money on transfers; there's a reason why the latest headlines regarding Arsenal transfers seem to suggest that we aren't bringing anyone in until some players are sold or moved elsewhere on loan... we know this club knows how to utilize press coverage to further their questionable agendas, it's the very reason why the Sanchez situation has become such a nightmare

3 is a silent pick em so money line the game with a dog of 3 pts or less, 85 % of teams that cover 3 points as dogs win the game outright so why give the books any more than you have to, make sure you take dogs in first half ONLY, i cant stress this enough, more times than not if a dog will cover the game, (big dogs +7 or higher) they will show up early and you do not want to get screwed in the 2nd half by blowing the cover, these are things the sports books never would tell you but surely will save you a lot of aggravation in the LONG RUN

You are 100 % right but i think the problem with the fans (me incl) is that Arsenal / Arsene should of signed more players in the summer with the money we had in the bank to give us the depth to rotate and not have players injured 40 % of the time leaving us on the edge of exploding playing at 60 % for 2 months solid in a very much tighter premier league where even so called smaller teams have more money, bought better players and are not easy to beat these days.

At Arsenal that's not philosophy, we want to win out of our own money as that is so sweet, more enjoyable and gives one pride.

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

I believe Ancelloti is bluffing to get more money and they are so rich and unprofessional that they would give someone up for free.

The yank couldnt give a crap about what happens on the pitch as long as the money is stacking up and our chief exec is a man city supporter so no need to say anything more about him.

Now we have players contract not signed why was the money denied to them then and now willing to give more plus why are we paying so much for a looser coach when he isn't in top managers anymore..

I honestly believe that the board who are incidentally ALL landed gentry and upper class silver spoon, merchant bankers and old money doyens are more than happy with the way the business wheels turn and really don't give a sh!t about silverware and honours AND THATS why Wenger has kept his job so long without delivery.

The problem is with ur stubborn attitude.Thing is you think you can win the premiership on the cheap, but you cant cause you can't motivate the players ffs.Leicester winning the premiership will give you one more reason to say see i told you we don't need to spend big money to win the league, but you had 12 attempts to do so for the past 12 years cause our team for those year was better than Leicester squad and you still didn't win a thing.Just because you have a mouth doesn't mean you could say anything show some respect for the fans, stop blaming the fans its the mediocre players who you have at the club that needs to blamed.And you as well for not spending any money on outfield player in the summer.

She said right from the beginning that it would be dangerous for her to make 135, demanded more money to do it, and the UFC was not willing to pay it, so they gave her a contract to fight in Invicta, this was in 2013.

Firstly we'd have had money to spend over the last 10 years so give Chelsea much more competition and they probably wouldn't have won as much.

Yes, we have the cap space so maybe give the man more money if that's what he wants.

i agree andy but its not just the 4 years of hard work that should be taken into account, firstly the fai hav missed out on millions at a time where money is already tight, and more importantly the fact that given, kilbane, o shea, dunne, duff, whelan and keane may be too old when the next one comes around and for a professional footballer to hav a chance to represent his country on the biggest stage of all taken away in this manner is cruel, there can be no argument against technology when there is so much at stake as for henry being labelled a cheat i do not agree as it came at him so quick and although he in fact handled it twice i do not believe it was pre-meditated like maradonnas effort or that disgusting dive by anelka at 0 - 1... can any1 who watched the game live please tell me how lass diarra stayed on the pitch let alone avoided a yellow??

These convenient products give you more product for your money with less packaging, so they're not only easier on your wallet, but on the Earth as well!

I got some in the mail a little and gave it away to needy ppl so they didn't try diluting their formula with water to save money = / I also agree about BM banks, it should be everywhere and over supplying mamas should take part at making more babies healthier.