Sentences with phrase «give people a case»

Not exact matches

Look to the case of Tim Romero, a Tokyo - headquartered entrepreneur who, earlier this summer, «gave up» and closed ContractBeast, a startup that produced software for people who make software, when it hadn't gained a significant following after just seven months in business.

You need to let people know where you volunteer and what else you do in your free time, which in my case includes a blog that I write and fitness classes that I teach — just to give you an idea.

The spokesman added that there have been other cases in the UK in which young people were given more lenient sentences.

Gifts of cryptocurrency are also reportable: In that case, you inherit the cost basis of the person who gave it to you.

«In many cases we've actually helped people that have decided to leave the business get other jobs and dedicated part of our HR function to going out and building relationships and giving referrals.»

Though clearly not the case, «Breath of the Wild» gives you a sense of being the first person to discover its treasures.

The researchers believe that this dichotomy might be a classic case of the «licensing effect,» whereby people give themselves permission to behave badly after a noble move (or vice versa)-- in a sense, balancing out of their good and bad self - image.

But cases that would normally be rare are happening with increasing regularity as the drugs are being given to so many people.

Their role, in most cases, is to let people vent, to engage in virtue signalling, and to give them a focus for their indignation.

I sat in many tense meetings when the guys from Microsoft tried to give people amazing deals on Azure (which Microsoft eventually offered as a cloud alternative) and it was as if they were offering to give these people a bad case of acne.

Ask people questions where you give them a choice or present a small case study and ask how the candidate would solve it.

People scrolling through Facebook can immediately decide whether this is something they need or want and, in this case, pick up the phone and give Redmaster Designers a call.

«Since there's no rule restricting the way we give options to people who are not executives or directors, we make those decisions on a case - by - case basis, based on a worker's seniority, merit, and importance to the company,» he says.

«We are doing what journalists throughout said mainstream media are supposed to do: challenge the conventional wisdom, hold politicians» feet to the fire, ask tough questions, report facts that are in many cases inconvenient truths for career politicians, and give a voice to the millions of people worldwide who have had theirs taken away from them by world elites who consider the ordinary person beneath them,» Boyle said, pointing to Breitbart's record July traffic as evidence Americans «hunger for something different.»

«I think people are hiding behind the fact that futures markets have 20 percent odds of a move, and the Fed would not go against that, but my reading is that's not relevant in this case because the market's never going to give them a green light.

Those earlier tariff cases gave US importers and other interested persons an opportunity to argue whether such added duties are justified and an opportunity to seek judicial review of agency decisions.

Midnight Money Machine works in the same way all these scams work, the scammers offer you a robot that practically guarantees you will be rich, for free of course, with the justification usually being the creator is already rich and wants to give back to the people, or some sort of beta testing excuse, as is the case for Midnight Money Machine.

For instance, in the case of Moses, when he confronted God in Exodus 32:11 - 13 after God had threatened to destroy Israel for their sins, Moses confronts God and recounts the promises that God made to Abraham, Isaac, and Israel to multiply them and give them the land as an inheritance forever — and this was exactly what God intended him to do, intercede for God's people — of course God did not forget His promises that He had made to His people, but with the threatening of an omnipotent God, Moses was even more resolved to lead this people in righteousness.

James 2 gives several examples of «righteousness» that was achieved when people's actions (in this case, Rahab's and Abraham's) aligned with their faith.

What good are morals if the one giving them supports morals that most people consider to be awful like slavery and discrimination against women, gays and the handicapped, as well as beating children and slaves without punishment in some cases?

The best case scenario for you is that you are one of the few people God cares about and the rest of us don't matter enough to him to give us any reason to believe in him.

If you're a woman, don't think too much about your disorder, it is natural, but in any case, your disorder is giving you an opportunity to improve your writing skills, let people talk, keep going buddy, I will read your posts

In proving your case of a God, is it not vital that a person give sound detailed evidence.

In the case of Peoples Temple, the total self - giving masked the enslavement to death, the «beasts» mentioned in the Book of Revelation.

Some people recommend putting it in writing and giving a copy to the pastor (and in this case the youth pastor) and to the board members / elders or whatever the governing body is called.

Imagine Goods partners with vulnerable and marginalized people around the world to make products that, in many cases, give them the first fair wages they've ever received.

Ann ensures that each Grace Case offers you not only fair - trade, artisan - crafted heirlooms that changes the worlds for so many of our sisters, but Ann also offers creative ideas and resources of how to use these heirlooms to continue to give grace forward in your own life, to your people, and your community — so you, as a GenEsther, get to be the gift, for such a time as now.

And just in case you are one of those people (based on your previous post if I were to make an assumption I would guess you are) that denies all scientific evidence that suggests that sexual orientation is innate and you believe rather that it is a choice we make, let me give you an example of how it still would not be justifiable to hate everyone in a group based on something that isn't innate.

In the latter case the person tempted to provide too liberally, even to those who have no legitimate needs, must be helped to realize that undue giving can reinforce dependency patterns.

Half the things you mentioned on your post are irrelevant in our case as most people we have come across have needed the stuff that you mentioned not to give out but I guess it's a different situation everywhere.

What they do to each other, and to people on a few well noted cases, gives me the willies.

FYI — there are hordes of people that need to be given not only an apology but reconciliation and in some cases restitution.

If this is the case with the widow, what did Jesus think about the wealthy people giving to the temple?

On Apel's account, these rights articulate the valid meaning that can be given to the second formulation of Kant's categorical imperative: «So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only» (46).

This is going to be a shock — the men who actually wrote all the parts in the Bible and made changes to the infrastructure of Christianity — including Constantine circa 300 AD in Rome — were not afraid of unleashing the occasional metaphor... in other words the Bible is not entirely literal — no, you are supposed to use your imagination... In many cases the disciples didn't actually witness an event — it was long distance and time altered hearsay — God figured Man could handle that... So don't be afraid to dilute - God's cool with that — as long as you do the right thing in life — feed the poor, help your neighbor, don't kill or covet - just be a good and decent person - smile, love and give generously... God doesn't need robots — He wants thoughtful individuals who help!!!

In any case, political commitments reveal something about the people holding them even when they give little insight into the world.

Yahweh in hebrew means my Lord and is a common reference meaning supreme God.In the bible satan is referred specifically as the adversary in hebrew or slanderer in greek its quite clear there is no confusion.Satan is not in the same league as God he is sovereign in fact God has satan on a leash and limits his control particularly over his people as we read in Job.Christians need to realise that satan can influence us if we walk according to the flesh.In the case of David calling a cencus meant he gave in to his pride he wanted to know how many soldiers he had believing numbers would give him the upper hand and so Satan took advantage of his weakness and Davids choice displeased God.David of all people should have known as he as a young man had defeated goliath a mighty warrior and it was because of his faith and trust in God that he overcame.But it wasnt God that made David make that decision it was his own and satan tempted him and he gave in to that desire In the two verses there is no confusion if you understand how God and satan operate i did at one stage have the same issue with Jesus sending the demons into the pigs why would he help satan or at least it appeared that way?

Many outward expressions are suitable, the appropriate one in any given case depending on personality type and on the person's social and cultural situation.

For in case at a given moment a physician is convinced that this or that person is in good health and at a later moment becomes sick — the physician may be right in affirming that the person was well then, and at a later moment became sick.

But if, as is now the case, most of the people of the world in general want this tyranny checked, then each level of community of communities can be given the assignment to make sure that the member communities allow participation of all their citizens and respect their right to differ and be different.

With Atheist and not having to use another persons words to argue their case, feel this give atheists a much broader spectrum to argue from.

Especially in this case, NOT INSANITY, he took time to plan this, build bombs, and intended to harm as many people as he could, we should focus on the victims, the families, watts to prevent similar tragedies, and STOP GIVING THESE PSYCHOTIC PROPLE THEIR UNDESERVED ATTENTION.

Patrolmen were armed with whips, and in some cases guns, and were given the discretion to beat and even kill black people — even compliant ones (it was not illegal at the time to kill a black person since they were deemed non-human).

And for the record, I neither like nor dislike Chris Christie as much as most people do, but I give him high marks for being pro-active in the case of the storm.

In the former case, «He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him,» and in the latter, «[He] gave them up to vile passions...» This may be in spite of the propositions a person believes.

It is true, as Hall points out, that for Whitehead ordering principles are «immanent» within particular occasions (see UP 261 - 70), but in most cases those ordering principles also reflect the «mutual relations» of individuals, as well as the «community in character» pervading groups or societies of individuals (AI 142).13 This is particularly true of persons: the relations between occasions which constitute the human body and brain, and the «community of character» of the succession of personal experiences, give an essential element of unity to human experience.

Given the Phantom's reality, people will go to any length to defend their creations (in the case of The Public Burning, their patriotic zeal, given focus in the character of Uncle Given the Phantom's reality, people will go to any length to defend their creations (in the case of The Public Burning, their patriotic zeal, given focus in the character of Uncle given focus in the character of Uncle Sam).

Often times, as in my case, the religious community is a substitue for our broken families of origin.Idolized leave it to beaver believers... what results, ineviable, is people do what people do... display their confusion and pathological leanings to miss the mark... Finally, after a slow painful death to my / our illusions, we can give up being perfect in favoure of a peace that passes all understanding and give a big jucicy kiss to the abusuridy of our naccasistic culture while finding ways to celebrate our ONENESS....

People don't report hardly any cases of food - poisoning because most doctors and clinics refuse to treat it or even show any signs of giving a rat's ass about food poisoning.

Many cases of able - bodied young persons who were given the chance and left, of rabbis who made use of their special standing outside the immigration quota, filled us with sadness and indignation.