Sentences with phrase «give real answers»

The next 10 - 15 years should give us real answers as we see what predictions and data analysis turns out to be correct.

We Pender capital financial give real answers real solutions to your financial problem.

the only reason your stopping this practice is because your man is running for office, give us real answers and not the BS hype your trying pull over America's eyes.

If you can give real answers to the vendors, your potential new clients, they will again trust you as an advisor and a resource.

«Genetic risk of gene tests, like [those performed at 23andMe], are very incomplete and don't give the real answers.»

Sir Keswick was pretty disappointed when asked about why Kroenke got 3 million out of the club for advisory reasons, again not giving a real answer.

whether the weight loss is lean or fat gives you the real answer of what is the required energy deficit per unit of weight loss

When the laughter dies down, he gives his real answer: «Complete knowledge of the yoga method and patience with the students.»

It was poorly written and gave no real answer.

By giving them a real answer you are helping them connect that they must learn what they are learning for their future.

I don't suppose its possible to give a real answer to how many commenters are suitably qualified to comment — but after a few years visiting this blog, I would guess that at least 50 % of commenters are well educated (degree or higher) and there is a quite varied range of expertise — some may be simple geologists / engineers (like myself), others maybe IT specialists, or statistical analysts, etc..

Because Rocket Lawyer does the first round of intake, I can have substantive conversations with on call clients — giving them real answers to their questions.

Not exact matches

They'll answer your questions, encourage you in real time and give you the support you need.

Calling the 6.6 % real return a «chain letter» and a «Ponzi scheme,» he went on to note, «The legitimate question that market analysts, government forecasters and pension consultants should answer is how that 6.6 % real return can possibly be duplicated in the future given today's initial conditions which historically have never been more favorable for corporate profits.

I'm weary of some of the real estate crowdsourcing sites out there like Fundrise, they couldn't give me good answers on the phone and I can't really tell what I'm investing in.

In this case, as you can see, Google understands your real intent (you want to know how much $ X are worth in euro) and offers to give you the answer in the search result.

I won't be as confident in the answers as I would if I had real - world experience working with this audience, but the process gives me a starting point to create content without wasting time answering dozens of demographic questions.

This Q & A session itself can be a real market mover as nobody knows the questions that will be asked nor the answers given.

To help answer your questions and give you a little more insight on green building practices, we isolated 7 questions that are commonly posed regarding sustainability and investments in real estate.

And yet when it comes down to the final moments, when it gets real, when we have no more need for the societal benefits of religious posturing, we learn what is really most important, and the answer (given the real purpose of life, see above) is what we should reasonably expect: family.

So I Listened to all of his sermons read all of his blogs and than decided to leave my number to see if he would really call as he says on his web site, With in 2 hours I recieved a call and DR. Collins never rushed me off the telephone answered all my questions, And After just that one call you can tell he loves and believes in what he does, He wont be for everyone, Because he does talk about damnation and what it takes to get to heaven, And its not from giving ministers our money > I watched the you tube videos of many and he is just for me, everyone has a choice but in listening to his sermons and reading his blogs and than the telephone call this guy is the real deal.

So my answers may not be real good, they may not even be satisfactory, but I will give you what I think and what I know.

Only someone who overlooks the fact that this answer itself has a real history which is a history of the reality reflected on as well as of the reflection itself, can think that the Church with its principles, because they too can be given concrete form, is always able to follow directly on the heels of what is new in the changing course of history and that only by its own fault and failure could the Church lag behind events in its theological reflection on morals.

This is a travesty of Christian theology, which is not simply an answer system but is, instead, a way of connecting real life questions with fundamental and ultimate answers — which are by no means achieved or given overnight.

come on... i've given you much more credit than your answer... for real....

I was at a July 4 event over the weekend, and when we recited the pledge, my daughter asked why we do it, and I gave her a real short answer... since we were in the middle of reciting the pledge.

«But there is a real problem with modern media requiring us as politicians, as leaders, to give instant answers to everything.»

So, I say, gods might exist but the probability is very low, and decreasing given the amount of time believers have been flailing about trying to make the irrational rational and how science provides better answers with real evidence, peer - reviewed under the scientific method.

The only thing, as far as I am concerned, that keeps us permanent is our belief in the value of goodness, and how we translate that into daily action, even across the boundaries of race, gender, class, and creed... That is real permanence precisely because it does not, as a form of consciousness, submit to dogma that, with the way reality and history simply IS, or plays out, CAN NEVER give us all the answers...

Maybe the real question we should be asking ourselves is, «Who does God gives the answers and solutions to?»

There was a real sense of earnestness, which made me go home and think, «Let me really rethink my answer and make sure I am giving an answer that is truthful and also respectful.»

I've answered your question about authority with reason giving authority and your attempt at making out that I am not interested in rationalising the «real story» about Jesus.

The real question Cobra is how did I get this smart, and the answer is by watching dumber than rock idiots like you who keep giving money to faith leaders who know the crap they preach is nothing but lies but are too stupid and lazy to get a real job so they depend on ignorant and stupid fools like you to provide them with an income.

A few of the obvious drives that pack us off, daily or weekly or episodically or, for some, in hope, permanently, are fear or even terror in the particular given set of circumstances; the sheer discouragement and exhaustion of facing questions without answer; profound disillusionment — it takes many forms — with the pertinent, prevailing system or systems; deep and bitter contempt for one's own society, bred of the abysmal failure to attain in consistent practice even a semblance of the justice professed and acclaimed; despair — so it was with the college generation of the late sixties — over the formidable obduracy of a political establishment in going its merciless way quite apparently deaf to the cries of anguish of its empathetic and real victims, victims by the tens of millions here and around the world.

I cant praise God enough for the internet we cant be ignorant these if we want to learn anything all we have to do is to jump on the internet for answers since I have accepted Jesus as my personal savior thirty five years ago i cant stop myself to share my experience with people but since i lost my husband through a tragic accident my life took a different turn my savior became more personal and real to me i give myself full to the lord and the result of that people stat asking me for bible study which i have never done in my life so I decided to search the net and i came across your website which put the whole gospel in a simple way and i am going to use it for my first bible study and see how the holy spirit will lead from there.I came to the conclusion that our trials is a blessing in disguise and i praise God for it.keep up the good work God bless Martina keep me in prayer please

Luther gave the answer of the communicatio idiomatum, or the interpenetration of attributes of each nature.16 On the basis of the communicatio idiomatum, the Lutherans could say that the body of Jesus Christ is omnipresent and thereby affirm a real presence in the sacraments.

The answer given is that it was really destroyed by Emperor Shih Hwang in 213 B.C., in the general attempt to destroy the Confucian books, and that the book of annals which was somehow preserved came to bear the name of the real document, Spring and Autumn.

Dr. Campbell mentions in the intro to this cookbook that people always ask him what he eats, and that undoubtedly he would give people a limited answer that would disappoint those wanting to make real lifestyle changes.

What a beautiful story and how incredibly real — it is crazy how children can go from asking the most profound questions we adults at times struggle to answer or struggle to answer in a way that gives justice to the question and yet, a mere 30 seconds later the same kid can turn to the most seemingly profane distraction.

They added Marco Estrada to their rotation this winter in the Adam Lind trade, but he's no real answer, as he's never thrown more than 150 innings and isn't likely to give up fewer home runs in everyone's favorite Canadian bandbox.

You can give the stock answer of «Ronaldo» but Real score 100 + nearly every season.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

«i turned down the whole world» is what Arsene tells us but let me tell you if he had performed like he have at Arsenal for the last ten years he wouldnt have lasted 5 minutes at any other clubs, Would Barca accept a 8 - 2 drubbing at Real or vice versa??? Would Barca accept 20 years of «trying» to win the cl??? would Barca accept half arsed players giving 50 percent at bramall lane or white hart lane???? would Barca accept more and more outlandish excuses for poor defeats??? Would Barca accepts wengers famous «Values»??? And would Barca accept to pay a very ordinary coach 10 mil a year to achieve the very minimum??? i think you know the answer.

And my immediate answer is always the same — they aren't too old; if you give them a chance, and if you are consistent, it really (pardon the pun) is possible to get your kids to eat real food.

She believes in being real with God and with each other, and refuses to give wishy - washy answers to nitty - gritty problems.

Given that «tax + «naturally exempting»» Google search is practically empty, this doesn't seem to be a real term in the first place, so it's impossible to answer withoout explanation of what you mean by «naturally exempting»

Reporters are so dependent on politicians to spoon feed them «content» that they're afraid to demand real answers when politicians give them b.s.

«The only real answer is giving back these donations to a domestic violence program in your community so they can protect battered women and help them rebuild their lives.»

The answer is to persuade the 40 % of the electorate who have currently «given up» not to sit on their hands and abstain from voting — but to vote for the minor parties — if we can persuade enough to do this, then PR and real change will inevitably follow.

The questions «what were the stated aims», «what was the real ideological intention», and «why did the policy not achieve the stated aims» give very different answers.