Sentences with phrase «give reasons for their judgment»

The seven - member panel of justices, presided over by incoming Chief Justice Sophia Akuffo, did not give reasons for their judgment but indicated that they will make available the full details of the decision in a few hours.

The seven - member panel of justices, presided over by incoming Chief Justice Sophia Akuffo, did not give reasons for their judgment but indicated that they will make available the full details of the decision in a few...

Not exact matches

RE: «when you're standing before your judgment being judged for the things you deny, how about taking all of those science books and «reason» with you» So, you're so SURE gawwwwwwd didn't give us science that you forego all medical treatment, and you live like the Amish....

However this must be done in such a way that the reasons for both opinions, that is, those favorable and those unfavorable to evolution, be weighed and judged with the necessary seriousness, moderation and measure, and provided that all are prepared to submit to the judgment of the Church, to whom Christ has given the mission of interpreting authentically the Sacred Scriptures and of defending the dogmas of faithful»

And I have had moms that gave breastfeeding a shot, and they did it for some time, and it wasn't working for whatever personal reason, and there's no judgment, and then I can also help them to gently end their breastfeeding journey.

Justice Nnamdi Dimbga while delivering judgment in the suit filed by Omo - Agege challenging his suspension from the Senate, held that the reason given by the Senate and the Senate President for suspending Omo - Agege was unconstitutional.

In delivering a summary of the lead judgment, Justice Muhammad said he would give his reasons for his decision on November 18.

In giving her judgment in the case, Her Lordship Barbara Ackah - Yensu pointed out that: «I find both 2nd and 3rd defendants, particularly Catherine Afeku, not to be credible witness and they mounted the witness box to tell the Court a pack of lies, and it is for this reason that I preferred the evidence of plaintiff that she never saw the company's regulations».

Given that there is no technically correct set of standards and given that expert judgment about the quality of standards has never been validated by better student outcomes, there is no reason for Arkansas to defer to the small group of national experts who drafted the Common Core standGiven that there is no technically correct set of standards and given that expert judgment about the quality of standards has never been validated by better student outcomes, there is no reason for Arkansas to defer to the small group of national experts who drafted the Common Core standgiven that expert judgment about the quality of standards has never been validated by better student outcomes, there is no reason for Arkansas to defer to the small group of national experts who drafted the Common Core standards.

(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.

On 1 March 2016 the Court of Justice of the European Union gave its judgment in the joined cases of Ibrahim Alo and Amira Osso, Cases C - 443 / 14 and C - 444 / 14, ruling that the EU's Qualification Directive does not sanction the imposition of restrictions of the freedom of movement for beneficiaries of subsidiary protection, and that such a limitation is not justifiable for reasons of territorial sharing of social assistance burdens, while at the same time leaving it up to the referring German Federal Administrative Court to decide whether the limitation can be justified for reasons of migration and integration policy.

FIPO also argued that the majority had wrongly rejected Mr Glynn's dissenting judgment and / or failed to give adequate reasons for disagreeing with the dissenting judgment.

Sir Andrew Morritt, who gave the only reasoned judgment in the Court of Appeal, confirmed that it is not possible for a planning authority to authorise a nuisance, although the effect of a planning permission may be to alter the character of a neighbourhood for the purposes of assessing the question of nuisance.

The Court may set aside the judgment for any of the reasons given above.

It was not appropriate to take into account the course the litigation took thereafter, and the reasons for judgment on the summary dismissal action given one year later, in deciding whether H met the standard of care at the time.

Reasons for judgment in New Mex are not publicly available so it is not known how much weight the court may have given any potential aggravating factor.

this was a bizarre case for a number of reasons, but the original judgment against Mr Miazga should never have been given.

While the Court of Appeal in Denton declined to provide a list of good and bad reasons for compliance it approved the examples previously given in para 41 of the judgment in Mitchell.

The reasons given for a court's judgment, frequently pointing out the law that governed the court's conclusions.

In the Alberta Court of Appeal ruling reported as R v Wagar, 2015 ABCA 327 Justice Brian K. O'Ferrall, speaking for a unanimous court, made short shrift of Justice Camp's judgment, at p. 1: ``... [W] e are satisfied that the trial judge's comments throughout the proceedings and in his reasons gave rise to doubts about the trial judge's understanding of the law governing sexual assaults and in particular, the meaning of consent and restrictions on evidence of the complainant's sexual activity... We are also persuaded that sexual stereotypes and stereotypical myths, which have long since been discredited, may have found their way into the trial judge's judgment.»

«For the reasons that I have given above, in my judgment the principle known as the rule in Re Hastings — Bass... is not a correct statement of the law.»

The transcript of the learned Justice's reasons for judgment given orally at the time demonstrated that the learned Justice was aware of the facts.

One bit of advice young lawyers are given — much easier to follow in the brave new world of reasons for judgment online and so easily searched — is to look for cases in which judges have commented on the expert's objectivity.

Lord Justice Wall gave another reasoned judgment, to the same effect, adding that the very nature of the pay schemes under attack in the Suffolk case (Agenda for Change) was such that it incorporated detailed procedures for complaints by individuals, meaning that the respondent was not likely to be wrong - footed by a grievance in general terms; on that basis, it was doubly important that such claims should not be defeated on technical grounds.

I'd have thought that the realization that most reasons for judgment get reported, or at leasgt that there's a very real risk of the reasons getting reported, make lawyers, at least, concerned about not giving the judge case law on point that's easily enough found and is relevant.

The sole reason the editorial gives for its conclusion is the number of judgments Justice Karakatsanis has authored to date (without any mention of their content or quality).

Justice Berger therefore noted, at para 17, that «[i] t is sometimes suggested that a judgment issued under the label «Memorandum of Judgment» has not been given the same amount of thought as one labelled «Reasons for Judgment Reserved».

At the end of his reasons for judgment, MacKinnon J.A. said that a copy of the reasons and the order could be served on the husband, giving his complete address.

However, the court will only set aside the judgment if the request is made within a reasonable time and a satisfactory reason for failing to respond to the original petition is given.

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — Best interests — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility and for the child to live with them — Where the respondent mother believes the child would settle down and accept the arrangement if the court ordered for the child to spend no time with applicant father — Where the court has a statutory mandate to make parenting orders with the child's best interests as the paramount concern — Where there is little doubt that the child would benefit from having a meaningful relationship with both parents — Where the child's clear views that he does not want to spend time with the respondent mother should be given significant weight in the circumstances — Where the child is of an age, maturity and intelligence to have principally formed his own rationally based views — Where the court is satisfied that it is in the child's best interests for the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted — Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live with him — Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events of the child — Where the child should be able to instigate contact with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances — Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child — Where the child is to have the outcome of these proceedings, the effect of the orders and the reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practical.

The Federal Court of Appeal now says of the reasons for judgment: «They will be released before the end of the month [November] upn a 48 hour advance notice being given.»