Sentences with phrase «give them any more money because»

The saddest thing is that people believe they should give more money because God gave a special revelation to the pastor.

I don't want to give them any more money because they use it to try and «double» and still don't pay their bills.

My friends kept giving me more money because they knew I was donating to Pets Alive again.

Not exact matches

Firstly, because it means higher interest rates — so when companies try to borrow money, that money will become more expensive and as a result they will have less room to give returns to investors.

Where ever the extra time and money is directed, if it improves your website, it is time and money well spent over the long term because it will give your company a more professional appearance online.

This can amount to a lot of money in the U.K., which has a reputation of being a more sympathetic place to play out high - stakes divorces, because judges generally order a 50 - 50 split of assets, giving equal weight to the work of a wealth creator and a partner.

But instead it gave all the money to the banks, and its claim was that if you give $ 4 trillion to the bank reserves this is going to help the economy, because the bank is going to lend more money to the economy and drive it in, $ 4 trillion deeper into debt.

It's all about control — since you put the money in a Roth 401k after you've paid taxes on it, it can grow tax - free and gives you more flexibility because the gains aren't taxed when you withdrawal.

In this way, people will be even more motivated to give their money to you because they will be getting something substantial in return.

So the more money you go and raise when you don't have any revenue yet, as people observe if they ever watched Dragons» Den or Shark Tank, is the more of the business you give up — because they say well, your business has no value.

Because the playing field has been leveled, the old tactics no longer work, and consumers expect more from you and every other business they give their money to.

Here's why: I know that if people get more business from LinkedIn because of what I'm showing them, it's going to help them make more money in less time, and that in turn will give them more time to do what they love and have a better life — travel more, get more family time... whatever that might be.

«She is living in poverty because the B.C. Liberal government is taking the money her dad pays to support her, and using it to pay for their misguided priorities, like spending more than a million dollars hiring failed B.C. Liberal candidates and giving insiders cushy appointments after the last election.»

The more you gamble, the more likely you are to lose more money because gambling gives you no chance to stop loses, and you don't have the chance to revive your money once the odds are against you.

Giving to one's local church is much more preferable than mailing money to some TV or radio ministry because (presumably) the local church will actually provide an annual financial statement that accounts for every dime received.

Same goes for theologies that suggest the poor are poor because of their sins, that if only the sick had more faith or gave more money they would be healed, that the tsunami or the earthquake or the flood that devastated a community was clearly the result of God's wrath on its gay inhabitants, that we can stop rape by teaching women to cover up better, that sex before marriage makes a person «broken» and «unwanted.»

Sow into the right local Church and the right Church / Ministry Organizations where the Holy Spirit leads you to because they are more resposible with money then the government, and above all, God will bless you for your giving!!!

And, as I said, I give a lot on the individual level, because I find it gets more done than throwing money into big organizations that eat up the $ $ in administrative costs.

One might assume that was because the government, giving more money to schools, wanted greater control.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

You will start to experience giving First - Hand... and I think that will make you want to give more... tithing all 10 % to a church disconnects the giving, because then it becomes second hand experience... you'll probably not see to who or where the money goes....

Bottom line, if he is angered bench the players who were not good enough and play those who deserve some game time based on the Southampton game or on games where they had a positive impact: - Take Özil out and play Ox in the hole (he has to understand your the highest paid player of the club, your given freedom like nobody else and your even seeking even more money with a new contract you can't play like that ever and go AWOL)- Put Sanchez on the wing or up top but put Welbeck in (Walcott didn't track back near enough for the Alsonso goal)- Iwobi has been bright from the wing let him play there - Xhaka has to go back in the holding midfield role and I would take out Coquelin because he could've taken a foul on the hazard's goal.

For that kind of money you'll be getting far more talented players.If you watch a lot of football you'll know this.He has age mates that are better than him but their not yet being talked about because some are in average teams and others are yet to be given a proper stage.Also, Monaco never wanted to sell Mbappe and Lemar this season.If Arsenal were interested in any other players we would have gotten them long ago.They might have even demanded more than # 80 if many clubs were interested and honestly speaking can you blame them?Is he the only talented winger that Arsenal are looking at?We have to spend money wisely and this ain't wise business.

i think we need to finish in the top 3.2 nd or 3rd doesn't matter to me because they are both automatic qualification spots.2 nd place means slightly more money and it may give the club more confidence, but it is the the 1st of the losers in reality.I think if we come 2nd which we probably will it may well hurt us, i know it sounds strange but i think Wenger will take 2nd place as a vindication an refuse to buy any1 as usual.

For me the choice is easy, I take CL football any day because it is better money and more importantly it gives you a better chance to attract the Lemar's of the world.

Former FIFA vice president Jack Warner accepted a $ 1 million bribe to back Morocco's bid for the 2010 World Cup, but gave his support to the South Africa campaign because it gave him more money, the Telegraph reports.

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

He could give a tuppence f@ck about the success of am «English soccer team» So with this in mind you have to remember that success on the pitch is absolutely the last thing that the board is after, Sanchez WILL be sold because A) he want far more money than the board are willing to pay him and B) he knows that the club are NOT seeking to up Thier game or compete on a higher level.

«The supporters sometimes say «we want more» and I get that, because the supporter is there giving his or her money and they want what they want and they are entitled to voice their opinion.

like I said before it doesn't matter who is the manager it starts from the top of the board has to go if we have a strong Like I said before it doesn't matter who is the manager it starts from the top board has to go if we have a strong Board Who is pushing the manager then we'll have a chance Wenger is a good manager but if we have a board he's not interested in winning things you know the answer to that do you remember when Dean was in charge Wenger was around then we won everything The board is destroying Wenger and Arsenal football club American doesn't give a toss about AFC if we put pressure on the board then they might start spending a bit of money or Selecor hopefully I'm glad we lost today because I think it will go to the board maybe get the stupid American to spend a bit more money

I think gmv8 is right, there is something sinister going on behind the scenes, the way the team played today wasn't just usual wenger's fault, yes his time is up and he needs to retire but i think there is more to the team than we know, players weren't communicating with each other on the pitch, they weren't caring about the game at all, at one of the goals i saw ramsey was talking to another player and not giving a damn about the game at all, there is some internal crisis between players, some probably hate each other, the defenders and the midfield lost the ball too much that it seemed they are doing it deliberately, some players seem to want out but not gone yet that makes me think they want out not because of money or the club but because they hate each other, specially Ox and Sanchez!!

I had been going since 1958 til last season when I finally stopped, ENTIRELY BECAUSE I finally resolved to give not a penny more of my money to this corruptly run club, while Wenger stays.

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

The problem is with ur stubborn attitude.Thing is you think you can win the premiership on the cheap, but you cant cause you can't motivate the players ffs.Leicester winning the premiership will give you one more reason to say see i told you we don't need to spend big money to win the league, but you had 12 attempts to do so for the past 12 years cause our team for those year was better than Leicester squad and you still didn't win a thing.Just because you have a mouth doesn't mean you could say anything show some respect for the fans, stop blaming the fans its the mediocre players who you have at the club that needs to blamed.And you as well for not spending any money on outfield player in the summer.

No, he's not a Natural Center back, would rather give Holding chance to get more experiences, to be honest it's very had to get a decent CB in this current market, because the money would be too much for them, i would prefer a DM and convert either Monreal or Kosiniac to a CB than spend another money on a CB.

Mot going to defend Alexis too much because he didn't show great integrity with the promise he gave City after United offered him more money.

Paying a 24 - year - old MVP the kind of money he's earning for his team makes far more sense than tacking on a fifth year to the contract given to a 30 - year - old MVP, just because that's always how it's been done.

If baseball's financial system is broken because of the Church of Young Players, maybe it's time to give those young players more money.

Given that low - income individuals are the most likely to not vote largely because they need to work - often being paid hourly and needing the money more desperately than others, and that low - income individuals are more likely to be Democrats than Republicans, why hasn't a democratic politician spearheaded this effort that could see increased turnout from their base?

Trump digital director Brad Parscale credits the campaign's Facebook outreach (along with Trump's own use of Twitter) for their victory, particularly because the social network was their primary channel into the hearts of prospective supporters and donors (more than two million of whom gave the campaign money).

But no - one could point directly to the good that Google was failing to do by avoiding tax — no - one could say «look, Starbucks gave money that helped build ten schools and five hospitals, and you contributed nothing», partly because Starbucks didn't give any more money (and nor did many other corporations), and partly because connecting tax contributions directly to outcomes just isn't possible with our tax system.

We are today investing more in building new road and new rail, including Crossrail here in this City, than at the height of the spending boom — because that is a use of taxpayers» money that gives a real economic return.

Standing outside the Bronx project Thursday, Cuomo said he's hesitant to give more money to the city because, he says, the agency's management is incompetent.

So, effectively my vote is worth much more than the vote of others, because giving my vote (and money) to another candidate is a much more powerful threat than some ordinary guy giving the vote to someone else.

«Because basically what the transaction is, is the president saying to the Democrats, I'll give you what you already have, which is DACA, and in exchange I want more money for border security with Mexico, which... is going to turn into a wall by the time he's finished.»

«Just because someone has more money than somebody else doesn't give them the right to buy an election,» Deacon said.

Because this is a very common practice, many creditors ask company A to co-sign loans to company B before they give them any money; however, the two - company approach gives you some protection and gives you a little more control if things turn sour.

Most of the companies and manufacturers of these kinds of products do not focus on the benefits their products can give to patients and consumers because they focus more on the return of money.

i could not agree more... i spent years buying items that were inexpensive just because i could by a bunch of them... i ended up giving them all away or wearing them once... money down the drain..

My interest are stamp collecting, reading, surfing the web, hanging out with friends, eating good food, jokeing with my silly boys, traveling, homemaking, shopping, loving a good man and makeing money to live, last but not least giving thanks to God (BECAUSE THE SOUL IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN A