Suffice it to say that I believe the morality of
a given abortion decision is subject to the competing interests present in that particular situation (e.g. life of the mother, incest, ra - pe, severe defects, severe economic hardship to already existing siblings, etc, v. abortion as birth control, pure personal convenience, etc).
Not exact matches
One hopes that Judge Sprizzo's
decision will
give other judges, faced with cases involving nonviolent protest against
abortion, pause for thought.
In her eyes, by running ahead of the people, the now - infamous 1973
decision gave «opponents of access to
abortion a target to aim at relentlessly.»
If you personally want to minister to women who are facing this life - altering
decision, adopt her baby and
give her the support she needs so she no longer feels an
abortion is her only choice, then you are free to do so.
My cautious hope, then, is that this
decision gives Roberts the psychological and political leeway needed to lead the Court in unwinding once and for all our unjust, abhorrent regime of legally sanctioned and publicly celebrated
abortion.
Given access to
abortion or gene therapy the
decision could be made to eliminate this fault of nature.
And where else but in the agonized
decision over
abortion are women
given a unique opportunity to face the frailty and finitude of human life?
The strength of my belief in the «rightness» of the choice of an
abortion given the context of my life and in the necessity for women to have the legal right to make the choice that I exercised enabled me to carry out my
decision; but these convictions do not protect me from suffering the consequences of my choice.
Senators Diane Savino, Jose Peralta, Tony Avella, Jessie Hamilton, David Carlucci, Marisol Alcantara and David Valesky discuss adding the protections for a woman's right to choose
abortion in the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade
decision into state law, enacting the Dream Act, which would allow the children of undocumented immigrants to receive college aid, a law to protect the rights of transgender New Yorkers, and putting limits on the amount of money donors can
give to campaigns, among other items.
With that history, it seems unlikely that Senate Republicans will rush to back items like a provision to codify the
abortion rights in the federal Roe v Wade
decision into law, or enact the Dream Act, which would
give college aid to children of immigrants who are in the country illegally.
Senators Diane Savino, Jose Peralta, Tony Avella, Jessie Hamilton, David Carlucci, Marisol Alcantara and David Valesky discuss adding the protections for a woman's right to choose
abortion in the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade
decision into state law, enacting the Dream Act - which would allow the children of undocumented immigrants to receive college aid, a law to protect the rights of transgender New Yorkers, and putting limits on the amount of money donors can
give to campaigns, among other items.
In a video, Sens. Diane Savino, Jose Peralta, Tony Avella, Jesse Hamilton, David Carlucci, Marisol Alcantara and David Valesky discuss adding the protections for a woman's right to choose
abortion in the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade
decision into state law; enacting the Dream Act, which would allow the children of undocumented immigrants to receive college aid; a law to protect the rights of transgender New Yorkers; and putting limits on the amount of money that donors can
give to campaigns, among other items.
In 1973, the US Supreme court
decision Roe v. Wade
gave every woman the right to have an
abortion.
Your state requires that one of your parents be told of your
decision at least 48 hours before the
abortion takes place, and
give permission for the
abortion.
Your state requires that one of your parents
give permission for your
abortion, and separately that one parent is notified of your
decision 24 hours before the
abortion takes place.
Your state requires that one of your parents be told of your
decision 48 hours before your
abortion and
give permission for the
abortion.
Your state requires that one of your parents be told of your
decision before your
abortion, unless you do not live with either parent and a reasonable effort to
give notice is unsuccessful.
Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) and Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota (PPMNS) applaud today's
decision by the U.S. District Court in South Dakota striking down major portions of a South Dakota law that required doctors to
give ideologically charged and misleading information to women seeking
abortion care.
Your state requires that one of your parents
give permission for your
abortion, and separately that one parent be told of your
decision 48 hours before the
abortion takes place.