Sentences with phrase «given by a commenter»

I used the turmeric paste guidelines given by a commenter.

Not exact matches

It's also why I invite comments and critiques from faithful collaborators — pastors, scholars, artists, scientists, doctors, parents, blog commenters, and editors — who often know more about a given topic than I and whose insights improve my writing by miles.

I figured now would be the PERFECT TIME to use the KINDLE CountDown opportunity, especially given where I'm positioned on the interment on LinkedIn where I Own three groups and Moderate three more, Twitter, etc I'm also being interviewed next week by someone who has a very sizeable following, and where I'm one of the MOST FREQUENT commenter.

Comment Reply Notification — For some strange reason, this feature isn't built in by default but what this essentially does is give the option for commenters to receive an e-mail when someone replies to their comment, thus boosting engagement.

By being ignored, commenters who are not deemed interesting by others will give up and go elsewherBy being ignored, commenters who are not deemed interesting by others will give up and go elsewherby others will give up and go elsewhere.

Given that I'm a Pollyanna compared to lots of commenters here, I'd be interested to see if anyone is willing to back Turner on this, say by projecting a decline of 5 per cent or more in world industrial output per capita in (or about) 2015, continuing with a sharply declining trend thereafter.

Given that I have a personal issue with Stephen Schneider - who, from what I know, was an excellent science communicator - being maligned on blogs, the relevant quote that is being mentioned by other commenters is

After a dozen comments by the same commenter in a thread that have basically been given in previous threads over and over.

Where Nic has been criticized by several commenters is his conclusion that the confidence range of possible dates should anyway be calculated from the pdf that gives the nonsensical result that most best agreeing dates should have zero probability in the pdf.

For those reasonable commenters here who wonder why the pro - AGW / Runaway Global Warming / Climate Catastrophe trolls argue incessantly, and nitpick every point ad nauseum,, the clear answer is given in this paper by a truly brave climate scientist, M.I.T.'s Prof. Richard Lindzen: click

By the way, thanks to all the commenters who gave me some good alternatives to using my own fairly week narration voice.

I guess our commenter was right — if we went by the common sense of Professor Hoffman in 1836, we would be advising clients to give up legal rights in the name of morality.

This commenter also recommended that to determine whether IRBs or privacy boards were giving such deference to prior IRB or privacy board review, HHS should monitor the disapproval rate by IRB or privacy boards conducting secondary reviews.

Commenters used both terms to refer to the individual's giving permission for the use and disclosure of protected health information by any entity.

The commenters expressed concern that state laws which provide less privacy protection than the federal regulation would be given exceptions by the Secretary and thus argued that the exceptions should be more limited in duration or that the Secretary should require that each request, regardless of duration, include a description of the length of time such an exception would be needed.

Some commenters suggested that if a subpoena for disclosure is not accompanied by a court order, the covered entities be prohibited from disclosing protected health information unless the individual has been given notice and an opportunity to object.

Another commenter expressed concern that the privacy rule could influence IRBs or privacy boards to refuse to recognize the validity of decisions by other IRBs or privacy boards and specifically recommended that the privacy rule include a preamble statement that: (1) The «risk» balancing consider only the risk to the patient, not the risk to the institution, and (2) add a phrase that the decision by the initial IRB or privacy board to approve the research shall be given deference by other IRBs or privacy boards.

These commenters believed that this approach provided flexibility by giving employers access to information when necessary while still holding employers accountable for improper use of the information.

First, the assumption by commenters that an advisory opinion would establish what law applied in a given situation and thereby simplify the task of ascertaining what legal requirements apply to a covered entity or entities is incorrect.

The commenters are correct that given the requirement that the Closing Disclosure be provided so that it is received by the consumer three days before consummation under § 1026.19 (f)(1)(ii), the consummation date may, in some transactions, change after the delivery of the Closing Disclosure.