I don't really agree with the reasons
given by the judge here, but I wouldn't want to grow up with my name being Messiah.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Manhattan concluded, in light of the Supreme Court's narrower definition, that the jury instructions
given by the judge in Mr. Silver's trial were erroneous and that a properly instructed jury might not have convicted him.
Another prize
given by these judges who probably do know their Degas fairly well from the handsome show of his work seen at the Philadelphia Museum a few years ago, went to the thoroughly charming if slightly saccharine White Ballet by Everett Shinn.
This is a speech
given by Judge Re at a seminar for federal appellate court judges.
The Jury will use the facts of the case during the trial period, while following the jury instructions
given by the judge when decided what damages will be awarded.
In his view, the reasons
given by the judge fell into neither of these categories.
Thats a given, but think its overdue to include the perspective of those who have to act as jurors, and work through the evidence presented, and the directions
given by the Judge.
Courts «view jury nullification as a pernicious element in the criminal justice system... the jury's official role in court proceedings is limited solely to judging the facts of the case and applying the law as
given by the judge to those facts» (Travis Hreno, «Necessity and Jury Nullification» (2007) 20 CJLJ 351 at para. 2)
In the letter, he discusses his plans for an appeal based in part on the instructions against jury nullification
given by the judge to the jury.
... we are all of the view that, substantially for the reasons
given by the Judge, theBaker factors do not require the Council to give Mr. Black an oral hearing in order to ensure that he is afforded procedural fairness in all the circumstances of the case.
Why is the public not given ready access to the text of all speeches
given by all judges (except when it is clear they are not speaking as judges)?
A jury must follow the law it is
given by a judge.
But wait - are you sure that your traffic school classes will really satisfy the requirement
given by the judge or in the location where you received the ticket?
(The following was adapted from an address
given by Judge Frank Sullivan, of the 322nd Family District Court, and expanded by Terrie Frances Frost, MA, MFT)
Not exact matches
«For the record, we wish to make it clear that as we start this trial David Baazov and his counsel have not been
given by the AMF or this court the time necessary to review the millions of documents disclosed and
judged potentially relevant,» she said.
The ruling late Friday
by a three -
judge panel in San Antonio
gave Democrats hope of new, more favorably drawn maps that could turn over more seats in Congress in 2018.
A Department of Labor rule putting the order into action entered the Federal Register in August 2016, but it was halted
by a
judge in October before it went into effect, who ruled it went beyond the authority Congress had
given the president.
According to a transcript obtained
by The Hollywood Reporter of testimony
given as part of a lawsuit filed against CBS in 2016, the TV
judge takes a no nonsense approach to getting what she wants.
At the showcase event, each group of 2 - 5 participants
gave a 10 - minute presentation of their work, followed
by comments and questions from a panel of
judges.
«It
gives an objective measure
by business
judges when they see the quality of our students.
@Russ, Even in the passage you've
given, it speaks of the person examining themselves, not being
judged by someone else.
Could it be that we forfeited the right to be trusted because we have spent decades
judging those who were seeking some kind of relief and got ensnared
by what
gave them a temporary reprieve from the emptiness and pain?
The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «
give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded
by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we
give glory to God... simply
by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless
judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»
If anything you fit the definition of a sinner as
given by your buybull... you are a hypocrite who
judges people and your god says
judging is sinful.
,» the journal First Things protested «an entrenched pattern of government
by judges» and raised the possibility that «conscientious citizens can no longer
give moral assent to the existing regime.»
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the ruling on Friday, saying the family had not persuaded the three -
judge panel «that the individual prayers or other remarks to be
given by students at graduation are, in fact, school - sponsored.»
The photograph was praised
by the
judges for «capturing the act of
giving and receiving communion in a sensitive and compelling manner».
Today, though miracles and healing do happen frequently
by the power of God in response to our humble prayers, God has
given us the Bible
by which we can
judge the truthfulness or error of someone's teachings.
And, although the AA site said, «a Police Officer who was at the scene also testified on Mr. Perce's behalf, to which the
Judge also dismissed
by saying the officer didn't
give an accurate account or doesn't
give it any weight,» a newscast, also on youtube, interviewed a Sgt. Brian Curtis, as the officer that spoke to both parties «a few blocks later».
Part of the problem the way the question is posed is
by assuming that we can abstract an ethical ideal from one part of scripture and use it to
judge the actions of God in another part of scripture, as though scripture were
given us so we could form such dehistoricized abstract ethical judgments!
The world may or may not be as tidy as it is often possible to conceive it to be; but it is part, and surely a legitimate part, of our inheritance from the successes of science, quite apart from anything else, that
given two otherwise satisfactory interpretations of which one is simpler then that simpler one is preferable even if there is no means of
judging —
by appeal to evidence, say — that it is not, in respect of its greater simplicity, mere plausible fantasy.
ME - Well, maybe... God is
giving you a «wake - up» call now, before it's too late, when you have to be «
judged»
by God.
On Monday, the pastor
gave the
judge a written statement and was questioned
by prosecutors and his defense lawyer, whom he met for the first time that day.
Given that the «anonymous» writer keeps harping on how he and his gay friends feel
judged and talked down to
by many Christians, it's quite pathetic.
@ Camel Toad: 1) you say evil is relative and
give examples of situational ethics, but you still appear to be appealing to some over-arching notion of good & evil
by which such situations are
judged.
But God is silent, or — as
judged by our uncertain hearts — is
giving contradictory messages.
«For
by these He
judges peoples; He
gives food in abundance.
If the meaning of our principle of historical aetiology, as opposed to an eye - witness report
by someone who was himself present at the event, has been understood, we presumably also possess a criterion for
judging what was correct in the description
given by traditional theology of the blessed, supernatural, original condition of man, as opposed to what was a simplified projection into the past, into human beginnings, of the state of man as it ought to be and will be in the future.
Similar confusion seems to have characterized some other periods of the Church's history but we shall derive more help toward understanding our situation and its possibilities if we attend to those times when a definite conception of the ministry
gave to both those who filled the office and those who prepared them for it a standard
by which to
judge their work.
The book of
Judges records the inhospitable treatment
given a certain Levite
by the Benjaminites of Gibeah.
In the image of Psalm 82, the world is
given over
by God to
judges who «
judge unjustly» and «lift up the face of the wicked.»
By the Pen or by the Sword or by what ever God has willed it to be... it is only then upon confrontation where and when faith is tested and judged, then it is for God to decide whom to give victory over the other the unjust one
By the Pen or
by the Sword or by what ever God has willed it to be... it is only then upon confrontation where and when faith is tested and judged, then it is for God to decide whom to give victory over the other the unjust one
by the Sword or
by what ever God has willed it to be... it is only then upon confrontation where and when faith is tested and judged, then it is for God to decide whom to give victory over the other the unjust one
by what ever God has willed it to be... it is only then upon confrontation where and when faith is tested and
judged, then it is for God to decide whom to
give victory over the other the unjust ones.
Why bother
giving them a book that is a tool to differentiate and
judge others
by?
«I prefer a church which is bruised, hurting and dirty because it has been out on the streets, rather than a church which is unhealthy from being confined and from clinging to its own security... More than
by fear of going astray, my hope is that we will be moved
by the fear of remaining shut up within structures which
give us a false sense of security, within rules which make us harsh judges, within habits which make us feel safe, while at our door people are starving and Jesus does not tire of saying to us: «Give them something to eat.»&ra
give us a false sense of security, within rules which make us harsh
judges, within habits which make us feel safe, while at our door people are starving and Jesus does not tire of saying to us: «
Give them something to eat.»&ra
Give them something to eat.»»
One
by one the crowd that
gave cover to Begley shrinks until only he remains, and he is exposed as a racist who cares more about
judging others than justice.
Jesus is not
giving us a standard
by which we can
judge others.
I may be a believer and a follower, but that
by no means qualifies me to be your
judge and CERTAINLY does not
give me some great understanding of God, how he thinks or what he will do.
You are
judging, your opening line for example said... «It's not like atheists offer people anything» You
gave no explanation as to what you meant
by that, and you made a sweeping statement about all atheists.
Man constantly makes false gods, but
by virtue of the image of God he can
judge them.28 This ability to
judge false gods does not
give man a vision of the true God, but it opens the door for a true revelation.
I am encouraged
by the fact atheists just can't
give up on religious debates, MAGNETO EL
JUDGE CLING DEL LA SOL... lol