Sentences with phrase «given fact scenario»

Several modifications of the totality of circumstances test have been articulated to organize analysis in a given fact scenario.

Not exact matches

Neither can I really see a scenario in which Christian Bale loses Best Supporting Actor, given the Guild's clear regard for «The Fighter» (it leads all nominees with «The King's Speech») and the fact that his chief competitor, Geoffrey Rush, has already been honored.

The scenarios that we were given are in fact situations that we have in our schools.

Of course the latter scenario means that the business owner will have to train all its staff to provide the right and most current facts on the food served and will have no way of checking if the correct details had been given by the employee (just imagine all the «he said, she said» discussions), with turnover times rising sky high in the meantime.

This is a scenario to which much attention should be given now rather than after the fact.

All the various scenarios aside, and given all these facts and figures, I am sure that success stories like that of Tricia's will only serve to inspire so many of us still working on chipping away at our debt balances.

Now these are perhaps not very smart criminals, given the cameras on an ATM and the fact that most ATM cards have cash withdrawal limits, so the reward in this scenario is quite limited, but the IQ of the guy holding you at knifepoint is not really at issue here.

Giving you the chance to be the General of either the Union or Confederate army in the battle of Gettysburg, it allows you to recreate the historical facts or try out many speculative scenarios.

This is reflected in the fact that the Category A scenarios summarized here, don't actually give a high likelihood of staying below 2ºC.

Discontinuities between different periods have no physical meaning and are caused by the fact that the number of models that have run a given scenario is different for each period and scenario, as indicated by the coloured numbers given for each period and scenario at the bottom of the panel.

This fact sheet provides context for the U.S. GHG reduction targets and a synthesis of WRI and other scenarios that present possible GHG emissions trajectories for the U.S., given various assumptions.

It is worth noting that the fact that there is a legitimate argument for why EPA can't regulate beyond the fence - line is what distinguishes this CPP scenario from, say, any attempt to reverse the endangerment finding, which would be doomed to failure given that such a reversal must explain how its new analysis is correct.

What I am asking of the maintainers of this blog, is precisely to help sort out what is «exaggerated» and what is not, what is supported by the science and what is not, with regard to potential catastrophic effects, and especially with regard to the question of whether there in fact remains any plausible scenario in which such effects can be prevented, given the effects that we are already seeing from the GHGs we have already emitted.

That's in the IPCC AR4 Working Group 1, Summary for Policymakers, so one doesn't have to read very far to see what the IPCC actual projections are... that the projected trends are significantly lower than what Monckton claims and the fact that they are fairly scenario - independent over the next 20 years or so (which isn't that surprising given that it takes a while for the emissions in the various scenarios to diverge significantly and that half of the rise is projected to be due not to ANY additional emissions but simply to the greenhouse gases already present in the atmosphere).

Then the expression for the expected CO2 concentration in 2010 reads -LRB-[CO2] in 2010) = 280 + (368 - 280) * exp -LSB-(10/100) * ln -LRB-[836 - 280] / [368 - 280]-RRB--RSB-, which gives a value of 386 ppm for 2010, so in fact the rise in CO2 levels that we have seen is a bit above what is expected for the A2 scenario if we assume that the amount above the 280ppm background is increasing exponentially to a total concentration of 836ppm in 2100 and that this total concentration had the value of 368ppm in 2000.

There are also two general rules that apply to such scenarios: 1) retroactive child support extends back three years from the date the paying spouse is given notice (for example by the fact that an application for an adjustment to support is launched with the court), unless there has been blameworthy conduct; and 2) the child must be a «child of the marriage» — and therefore eligible to receive support — at the time the application is made.

A review of common fact scenarios for each type of error will give you a better understanding of why these errors happen and the steps you can take to avoid a communications - related claim.

The fact that one has made arrangements for a future scenario where the family is financially taken care of in one's absence gives assurance and peace of mind.

Now these are perhaps not very smart criminals, given the cameras on an ATM and the fact that most ATM cards have cash withdrawal limits, so the reward in this scenario is quite limited, but the IQ of the guy holding you at knifepoint is not really at issue here.

Now, the scenario is changing and Apple has for the first time, put a proper strong contender in the game of smartphones where Android OS was quite clearly ruling (given the fact that it is an OS many brands use) and here comes the Apple iPhone 6.

But Alexa appears to already have an edge over Siri in this scenario, especially given the fact that it's being used at present in places such as the JW Marriott San Antonio Hill Country Resort & Spa, where 10 of the rooms have Alexa installed.