Sentences with phrase «given fraud case»

In every given fraud case, the prosecutor must definitely prove, beyond any reasonable doubt, that fraud has in fact occurred.

Not exact matches

In the case of JP Morgan, this has karma written all over it given the way its chief executive has ridiculed digital assets by associating them with fraud.

In both cases, this is typical «control fraud» from the banking sector as it allowed exponential growth in profit in the short term through higher loan volumes (for a given level of bank capital).

First, in a lot of cases, people have been given substantial grants to do honest research, so it really is no different from financial fraud or theft.

Judge Paul Peatross Jr. of Albemarle County Circuit Court found that Cuccinelli had given no reason to suspect that Mann had committed any fraud, one of the requirements of a state law that Cuccinelli used as the basis for his case.

However, it's very important to make sure that alerts of potential fraud are legitimate and from your actual bank or lender, and not a phishing scam, which are infamous for using potential cases and warnings of fraud to rope victims in to giving them their personal information.

While the level of fraud protection offered by a credit card and a debit card is therefore technically the same, the aftermath of credit card fraud is less severe, given that money is not removed from your bank account as soon as a purchase is made, as would be the case with a debit card.

«Not only have we been able to give investors earlier warnings of corporate frauds and other negative credit situations, but in many cases we've led the industry on upward credit revisions of worthy recipients.»

In light of the recent art - fraud case that involved the Knoedler Gallery selling «newly discovered» paintings by Mark Rothko and other Abstract Expressionists, some art experts have stopped giving their opinions altogether.

Given the case law, one might think that the Act could simply be ignored; the Statute of Frauds seems to be comfortable with e-communications — though only one Canadian trial - level court has so held, so far as I know.

For instance, in many money laundering and fraud cases, forensic accountants give evidence and it is usually necessary to cross-examine them.

This weird Facebook ownership lawsuit brought by Paul Ceglia has been going on for a while now, but it's noteworthy how many lawyers have taken on the case and withdrawn — especially given that Facebook is now talking about bringing actions against prior attorneys for Ceglia based on failure to report evidence of fraud to the court.

«Given government spending and resource cuts, it's likely there are a number of cases involving fraud that government agencies just can't afford to pursue.

Clause 2 of the Bill would prevent the attorney general from giving directions to the director of public prosecutions (DPP), the director of the serious fraud office and the director of revenue and customs prosecutions, in relation to an individual case.

«This judgment has not only established that NNPC is free to advance its case that the award had been procured by fraud, but it also gives legal clarity and precedent regarding the attaching of conditions to the raising of a defence to the enforcement of an international arbitration award.

Any attempt to sell or give away assets before filing bankruptcy may be seen as bankruptcy fraud by the court, and if discovered can lead to your case being dismissed or even felony criminal charges.

In addition to the aforementioned exception for cases when the injured victim was a child, there is also an exception for circumstances in which fraud was employed to conceal the injury; in those cases, the timeline is extended by 2 years, but even then, a claim can not be brought more than 7 years after the incident giving rise to the claim.

She essentially gave the back of her hand to the mitigating detail presented by Rubashkin's lawyers, including his responsibility for 10 children, his extensive charitable activities, the absence of any indication that he was motivated by greed, and, most significantly, the disproportionality of the sentence recommended by federal guidelines as compared to those handed down in fraud cases of similar size and scope.

l When the case involves an allegation of serious fraud or dishonesty, generally conclusions on such issues ought to be reached at trial, caution ought to be exercised before giving summary judgment in a case of that nature (Wrexham Associated Football Club v Crucialmove Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 237, [2006] All ER (D) 199 (Mar)-RRB-.

However, given the number of prominent and recently reported cases of civil fraud in the courts of Ontario and Canada and the frequency of reports in the media of those falling victim to civil fraud, it is easy to conclude that civil fraud and dishonesty has increased in Ontario, or that more victims of fraud are coming forward to seek redress for their losses.

A further unattractive feature from an insurer's perspective is the complete prohibition on avoiding the policy or claims, even in the event of fraud; the reimbursement provision in the policy does not give insurers sufficient redress in the worst cases.

Mr. D'vitre placed reliance on the judgment of English court of Appeal in case of Kanoria and others vs. Guinness (2006) 1 LLR 701 in support of the submission that even though in that matter challenged to the award in India had failed, English Court of appeal had refused to enforce foreign award as the aggrieved party was not given due notice of plea of fraud and was unable to represent its case.

In so far as reliance placed by the learned senior counsel for the respondent in case of Kanoria and others vs. Guinness reported in (2006) 1 Llyod's Law Reports 701 in support of the submission that though petition under section 34 challenging a foreign award in India had failed, English Court of Appeal had refused to enforce foreign award on the ground that aggrieved party who was not given due notice of plea of fraud and was unable to represent its case is concerned, a perusal of the judgment indicates that the Court of Appeal had rendered a finding that the aggrieved party who was unable to represent its case and had refused to enforce the foreign award.

It gives auditors the opportunity to audit how the platform is run as well as to detect cases of theft, fraud and other illegalities associated with a transacting forum.

Too bad the DRE probably won't listen anyways, they never do until lawsuits arise... I give it 2 years before all of these «fraud» cases create more disclosure issues in this business.