Firstly,
given judicial resources are currently stretched so thin, justice may still be delayed if all or even most cases were to be tried.
Not exact matches
The Supreme Court's decision in R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27,
gave priority to criminal cases being tried within a reasonable timeline, resulting in criminal cases receiving the majority of
judicial resources and civil cases being further delayed.
Concluding the two trustees were «unable to work together in any reasonable and effective way,» Justice D.M. Brown said the competing sides «can not reasonably expect that unlimited
judicial resources are available to devote to their internecine quarrels,» adding (with apparent frustration)(i) that the Commercial List in Toronto is «chronically short of judges,» (ii) that the «scheduling of criminal trials -LSB-...] has become particularly problematic» because it is «manifestly under
resourced» and (iii) that «dates for one day civil motions are now being
given out 8 to 9 months down the road.»
Over time, appeal by way of trial de novo
gave rise to increasing concern about inefficiency, waste of
judicial resources, and potential abuse.
At the time, Duke said that the acquisition would advance the missions of both organizations,
giving EDRM a home within a respected institution and
giving Duke and its Center for
Judicial Studies important new
resources.
«However, the new agency will not just be a
resource giving only a «sugar - coated» picture, reflecting the viewpoint of the representatives of the
judicial system.
But sometimes it's not possible
given the limitations on
judicial time and
resources.
Fostering Court Improvement Children and Family
Resource Center, Barton Child Law and Policy Clinic, Fostering Results, & National Child Welfare
Resource Center on Legal and
Judicial Issues
Gives States an efficient mechanism for sharing data between dependency courts and child welfare agencies so they can more effectively manage systems.