Not exact matches
Then pretending that those who lack their belief also have a
faith based position demand much
less intellectual discipline is a much easier option than facing up to the burden of proof they
give when insisting they believe what they do.
I don't know about you, but for me my
faith is
LESS about getting into heaven and MORE about what I do with this life I have been
given.
(A decision for same - sex marriage by a state could as in the case of Massachusetts, preempts the debate in that state, but it is
less far - reaching because it leaves other states to arrive at a different conclusion — unless, as some same - sex - marriage proponents have claimed, other states are required to recognize such marriages under the Constitution's requirement of
giving «full
faith and credit» to other states» proceedings.)
It wasn't just about the subject matter — although it's tricky to write about such a tender and intimate time in a person's life, to tell your own story while still holding space for stories that are so different than your own, to attempt to shepherd people well in the liminal spaces of their
faith journeys — but it was also just the season of life with being pregnant with our fourth and then
giving birth and suddenly having four tinies between the ages of 9 and newborn meant I had a lot
less time with a lot
less energy (and even
less sleep!)
Given this reality,
faith begins to look
less like a system or rational assent to a historical fact, a decision or even adherence to an ethical standard, and more like a recognition or awareness or belief or gratitude that our relationship with God is what
gives us life.
The reply
given by the Johannine Jesus appears at first to confirm this by saying, «If a man has
faith in me, even though he die, he shall come to life», but then proceeds to add quite a new interpretation of the resurrection power of Christ in the words, «and no one who is alive and has
faith shall ever die».13 C. H. Dodd concludes that «the «resurrection» of which Jesus has spoken is something which may take place before bodily death, and has for its result the possession of eternal life here and now... The evangelist agrees with popular Christianity that the believer will enter into eternal life at the general resurrection, but for him this is a truth of
less importance than the fact that the believer already enjoys eternal life and the former is a consequence of the latter.»
For if our
faith in the resurrection has any vitality or validity, it is nothing
less than the conviction that there is even now present and knowable within the Christian fellowship through «the Holy Spirit, which is
given unto us,» the full concrete personal meaning of «Jesus Christ and him crucified.»
How about we just settle on «Morons»...
given that it is only one
less letter that Romney's crackpot
faith.
The bodily resurrection of Christ is basic to Paul's understanding of eternal life, but this very concrete
faith that
gives rise to his hope that we will join Christ in a resurrection like his becomes
less and
less comprehensible the more one reflects on the eternity it promises.
The Franciscan spirit finds itself
less at home in the world than ever before,
less able to
give a direct assurance that such
faith in love is the key to human existence.
Here's another, scarcely
less oratorical in character, from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith: the title of this document (another wonderful example of Vatican bogus academic language when what is needed is a competent journalist used to writing informative headlines) is «Considerations regarding proposals to
give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons» (2003): The Church's teaching on marriage and on the complementarity of the sexes reiterates a truth that is evident to right reason and recognised as such by all the major cultures of the world.
they
give a high priority to evangelism: they will have one church service in the week devoted to evangelistic outreach or will
give prominence to a call to
faith in special services (however, this is
less true of some Exclusive groups which keep themselves separate from society).
When there is a momentary break in the course of these disasters, when abundance is known, when peace timidly establishes itself, when justice reigns for a span, then it is fitting, unless we are men of too little
faith, that we should marvel and
give thanks for so great a miracle, realizing that no
less than the love and faithfulness of the Lord has been needed in order that there might be this privileged instant.
People of
faith embrace a God -
given mandate requiring us to help the
less fortunate.
Contrast this with John's gospel (90 - 100)- like Mark, no birth narrative, but no mere human either and we've moved up and out of the old neighbourhood... nothing
less than the pre existent Word which is one with God.Now, that's a serious leap in real estate.Does this not suggest development rather than the monolithic thud of a «
faith once
given»?
Thornton goes on to say, «In the sermon of 1750 Jonathan Mayhew declared the Christian principles of government in the
faith of which Washington, ordained by God, won liberty for America, not
less for England, and ultimately for the world.3 And quite self - consciously, Thornton tied in the American Revolution with the earlier English Puritan Revolution when he stated, «The name of Hugh Peter reminds us that New England shared in English Revolution of 1640; sent preachers and soldiers, aid and comfort to Cromwell;
gave an asylum to the tyrannicides, Whalley, Goffe, and Dixwell; reaffirmed the same maxims of liberty in the Revolution of 1688, and stood right on the record for the third revolution of 1776.
Anyone who appeals to
faith and freedom in Christ to do
less, be
less,
give less, serve
less and love
less than our forebears has grossly misunderstood Jesus» message.
I was first thinking that we need a regista-esque player (to ease the pressure off Pjanic) but
given that a) Marchisio has looked very elegant in pre-season and b) perhaps Allegri is going to put some
faith in the up - and - coming Betancur, I suppose that has become a
lesser priority (although I'm wary of jumping the gun on this).
It's taken as an article of
faith in the education reform community: we're screwing poor kids by
giving them
less effective teachers than their more affluent peers enjoy.
Claims of «near certainty»...
given ever weakening real world data and study after study showing
less sensitivity than originally thought... are at this point prima facie evidence of bad
faith.
Any cultural inclination to
give less credence to symbols of the Islamic
faith, however, would potentially be counter balanced by a desire to «take back control» by favouring more traditional Christian symbolism.