Sentences with phrase «given less reason»

The ultimate result of this is that the audience is given very little opportunity to view Scott and Ramona as a couple and hence are given less reason to care about them.

I was annoyed to see every Xbox game going to PC too as it gives me less reason to get one.

These include the federal government's increased success in lower courts, giving it less reason to appeal, and a Congress that enacts fewer laws, giving the Court fewer statutes to interpret.

Not exact matches

That logic is another reason why OPEC countries have less of an incentive to cut back production: renewable energy sources is starting to give fossil fuels some serious competition, and oil - exporting countries have an interest in keeping oil a cheap alternative.

Many analysts have argued there is a dearth of compelling virtual reality content, which gives people less of a reason to buy an expensive VR headset that can cost up to $ 800 plus a powerful computer.

As one San Francisco - based Uber driver, Mikeal Gibson, told the Journal, «I've heard that the only reason [customers] give people less stars is for poor driving and bad behavior, so delineating those two would be useful.»

Still, in the interim this leaves an outfit like Unblock Us to quietly go about raking in some unknown sum of money while giving Canadian consumers less and less of a reason to subscribe to a broadcaster's VoD content or what - have - you because they already saw it all via Netflix U.S.

For the aforementioned reasons, you have less of yourself to give.

The reason this was done was because star wood gives out less points but requires less points, per category.

For about six years, Facebook does a surprisingly adept job of sidestepping major controversies, giving Zuckerberg less reason to tell anyone he's sorry about anything.

Another reason why monetary policy has become less effective in stimulating the economy is because the impetus from a given level of monetary accommodation likely has become attenuated — that is, less powerful — over time.

We will give you a full refund of the amount paid or an exchange credit as required, less (if for any reason these costs have not been paid by you) the costs of delivery to us.

Indeed there are indications that those most formed by the theory are less likely to see reasons for giving to others than are those less influenced by it.

I suggested that perhaps the lifeboats on the Titanic point to a more general sense that the stronger in a dangerous situation are morally compelled to protect the weaker in a dangerous situation, and that mothers can be awfully protective of their children after all, and that a man who (for whatever reason) might be weaker than a woman in a given situation should not feel like less of a man if she protects him.

Clearly the imminent collapse ofmany countries» populations is a worry, for economic reasons, and yet is still not yet giving rise to any significant response amongst Western societies to move to a more pro-family and less contraceptive culture.

Gregory makes a stunning point on the ambiguities of giving to those derelicts among the poor who are by consensus generally regarded as less worthy: One should give not just to the unworthy poor, but also to the worthy poor, regardless of their moral condition, and for a profound reason: because one «gives of his bread to an indigent sinner, not because he is a sinner, but because he is a man.

The reason for the present Republican surge is that this isn't change that most Americans believe in, although it is change they voted for (at least if any of them gave a moment's thought to the more or less inevitable policy consequences of their votes for Obama and a Democratic Congress).

Only recently, in Martin Mosebach's The Heresy of Formlessness, did I discover the original, all - but - suppressed reason for giving the Eucharist on the tongue: «Communion in the hand is inappropriate, not because the hands are less worthy to receive the Host than the tongue... or because they might be dirty, but because it would be impossible to rinse every participant's hands after Communion (that is, to make sure no particles of the Host are lost).»

Epicureans weren't given to copulating in public as less sophisticated hedonists were, but the reasons were not always exalted ones.

For reasons given in Chapter 4, the expectancy of a speedy end of the existing world scene did not basically pervert the ethical insights of the early Church, and still less those of Jesus.

But his very posing of the question makes no sense unless he is asking us to give him nothing less than «reasons» to explain how we reason about things when we disagree.

Here's another, scarcely less oratorical in character, from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: the title of this document (another wonderful example of Vatican bogus academic language when what is needed is a competent journalist used to writing informative headlines) is «Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons» (2003): The Church's teaching on marriage and on the complementarity of the sexes reiterates a truth that is evident to right reason and recognised as such by all the major cultures of the world.

Rauch, at least in this article, doesn't say that there is anything wrong with polyamory, much less what is wrong with it; nor does he provide reasons for not giving polyamorous «families» some form of recognition, as the «Beyond Same - Sex Marriage» signatories demand.

The same kind of scrutiny has been given to St. Francis and St. Clare, though for much less reason.

Don't be afraid of the jalapeno, it really mostly gives flavor this isn't spicy unless for some reason your jalapenos are super spicy but you can always use less and if you want more kick definitely use more.

One source said yes and gave these reasons: gelato is made with more milk, less cream and contains 5 - 7 % fat compared to 10 % in most ice cream; it's churned more slowly than ice cream resulting in less air being whipped into the mixture, creating a denser, «creamier» texture; finally, it's not kept frozen solid and is softer when served.

This Halloween season, Enjoy Life Foods is giving parents with children who have food allergies one less reason to be spooked.

Pure Life starting this week is launching a big new global campaign aimed at making its bottles less of a commodity by giving consumers more reasons to buy the brand than just the water inside.

Cech being very unlucky is the only reason why Southampton scored today plus Giroud was held and fouled in the box and i've seen penalties being given for way less so far.

Given the last four years, there are reasons to be skeptical, guarded, and less than enthusiastic about yet another comeback attempt.

You state we need a striker yet we scored two less than the title winners seven less than city, 2014/2015 we scored three less than Chelsea and 12 less than city you have to go back to 2013/14 to find a time where we were way behind in terms of goals scored and that was a massive 33 and 34 goals behind city and Utd with both those teams scoring 100 goals plus, the reason we need a striker is not as you and others push to win the title but to give strength and depth to an area that is thin on ground.

The fact that he's from Georgia would give him even less reason to leave since his family is local.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say there is good reason because frankly, Wenger has given game time to players who are far fresher who show way less instant talent, Gnabry is a good example.

I gave a reasoning, not the most in - depth as it would turn into pages of text lol How - ever I have pointed at past GREAT cptns and the qualities they had, they would not accept anything less than 110 % from their players and they motivated the team...

Another reason why the Arsenal man's was favoured could well be that his goal was boosted by the ball striking the underside of the bar, giving the goalkeeper much less chance of denying the goal, but United fans refuse to accept the decision.

look man i understand that you say ozil in the middle means no protection or less than adequate but ozil will be CAM and he is close to scoring a tap - in rather than giving shield to arteta who is an unreliable source and does not deserve the captaincy, wenger only gave it to him cause he gave the players some papering over the cracks statements after the Liverpool, chelsea and man city match and the player does not even have a cap for the national team Wenger may have seen this as a player who can play in and out with no internationals regardless of his qualities on the pitch and the main reason why he sold vermaelen who would have done decent job at CDM and then all that fluid style that arsene thinks he can play dictate «arrogance»!

The science that gives evidence that sometimes, for any number of reasons, there is pain and before it can be resolved there is less milk and stress and fear and even less milk and concern and doubt about milk from another.

Research shows that less than 5 % of all women do not produce enough breast milk to feed their own babies, so if more women were given the support they need, there would be no reason for them to purchase breast milk from an unknown, and potentially dangerous, source.

You know, antibiotics obviously were created for a reason, but a lot of time they are given to someone unnecessarily and they just compromise your immune system and so, the less sick that you get as an infant and a toddler, and you know, a child, is obviously creating a stronger immune system for you as in an adulthood and so, that would be, you know, the main reason to continue it, for as long as you find, you know, mutually beneficial for you and the baby.

In contrast, Rutishauser and Carlin found that overweight / obese women were less likely to give «poor milk supply» as the reason for early cessation of breastfeeding than women of normal weight (p < 0.05)[11].

Now that you have the information, there should be no reason for you to give your baby less than the best.

Finland is much healthier than the US given less poverty, universal health care, whiter population (African Americans have poorer health for not completely understood reasons), less diabetes etc..

And threatening without actual consequences [See # 2: Not following through], then you give your child even less reason to do what he's asked.

It also gives mothers less reason to supplement with bottles of formula, which is more likely to lead to early weaning.

There are several reasons for this: loss of appetite; vomiting, which may discourage mothers from giving food; or mothers feeding children less or giving diluted food based on traditional beliefs or on incorrect recommendations to «rest the bowel».

One reason that we don't tax gifts and inheritances at a 100 % rate is because the ability to pass on wealth to the next generation gives the people who are currently earning that wealth an incentive to create more wealth and because these very wealthy people would be less economically productive if they couldn't do so.

I'm giving them one less reason not to use it.»

They say it will weaken local parties, giving members even less reason to join up, and lead to bland, centrist candidates.

Smaller, dispersed droplets are less threatening for two reasons: they present more surface area to the water, so ocean bacteria can degrade the oil faster; plus, the small droplets are much slower to rise to the surface, keeping the oil at sea instead of in coastal wetlands and giving the bacteria more time to do their magic.