The phrase needs to be
given precise meaning.
Make sure every word is revised and edited to
give the precise meaning you intend to.
Give precise meaning to your job.
Not exact matches
Both are used because he holds that God stands back of the natural and
gives it
meaning, while at the same time revelation is necessary for a
precise understanding of God's will.
Here we raise the question of the
precise relationship of evangelicalism and fundamentalism as historical phenomena, I do not
mean here to
give any credence to what I predict will be the common evangelical response to Barr — that he fails to distinguish appropriately a modern enlightened evangelicalism from a more benighted fundamentalism.
Tell him the kind of action you want the pigeon to perform and he may
give what you ask; but by details I do not
mean a kind of action, but the
precise unique movements.
What's more, the way W particles themselves decay
means that they can not
give a
precise value of the Higgs» mass.
Botstein and Davis» landmark conceptual breakthrough, published in 1980,
gave researchers the tools to trace and map out the genetic inheritance of disease in humans, while Hogness» work provided the
means of identifying the
precise physical location of genes of interest on chromosomes.
This «marginal gain» of
giving the teacher - and student - the precious commodity of time
means that learning and teaching can happen at the
precise moment it should.
This
means that in every situation on the road,
precise fuel supply is guaranteed which is adapted to the
given load requirements.
This desirable masterpiece
gives new
meaning to the the art of driving with
precise steering, a responsive suspension, and a low center of gravity.
Some terms have more
precise meanings for a
given version of EPUB.
Along with meat and healthy fruits and vegetables, this blend also contains BLUE's exclusive LifeSource Bits, a
precise blend of vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants
meant to
give dogs everything they need to be strong and healthy.
Combining
precise geometry with vast scale, his remarkable installations
gave fresh impact and new
meaning to the experience of looking at art, while enhancing and expanding the appreciation of the surrounding world.
To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I
mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so
precise way (despite they continue to
give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I
mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so
precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
Such methods may avoid the misleading impression that a graph of an attenuated temperature signal might
give, but they do so at a price: Direct regression
gives the most
precise reconstruction, in the sense of
mean squared error, so these other methods
give up accuracy.
Although it might be possible to rewrite the first sentence using the synonym «attraction», this alternative fails to capture the
precise meaning conveyed by the original sentence,
given how the term is used in this area of biomedical research.
But the phrase in the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts, «the integrity of the electronic records [or documents] system,» requires an authoritative national standard to
give it a sufficiently
precise meaning to be workable — e.g. s. 31.2 (1)(a) of the Canada Evidence Act, and the reference to the use of standards in s. 31.5.
So, ignoring the every day English language
meaning of the words, is there in fact a clear and
precise definition of «assault» (in which case some sources are simply using it incorrectly), or do I just need to accept that there is confusion, even within the law itself, and rely on context to establish in any
given instance which
meaning is
meant?
JW will not
give legal advice, and is not
giving legal advice as to the
precise language to be used nor its
meaning or effect.