They don't want to change us, they want the same rights that are
given to every other religion.
They want to challenge the way government — which is supposed to represent all of the citizenry — seems to, in some cases, afford Christians certain platforms that aren't
given to other religions.
Not exact matches
Pretty much all
religions say the
other religions are incorrect, and Mormon Proxy Baptism doesn't do anything but
give a person the option after dying
to get the benefits of baptism.
There are so many
religions that
giving any of them precedence is necessarily preventing the free exercise of the
other ones and refusing the
others that special consideration, making the whole thing unequal
to all?
Letter
to Doctor Benjamin Rush from Thomas Jefferson Washington, April 21, 1803 Dear Sir, — In some of the delightful conversations with you, in the evenings of 1798 - 99, and which served as an anodyne
to the afflictions of of the crisis through which our country was then laboring, the Crhistain
religion was sometimes our topic; and I the promised you, that one day or
other, I would
give you my views of it.
In my own personal belief, the army is a christian majority, and only
gives face
to other religions that aren't Christ based.
Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice
religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying
to saints hopping
to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are
others different, I don't think
Religion and Science need
to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons
to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he
gave us the means
to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how
to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs
to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?
But until we come
to the end of ourselves then we are going
to do and say what we want, even as it was with me: It's one thing
to be a heathen, even as I was, but a whole
other ball game
to set our hearts on God and His truth; yet, that can only come when we are sick and tired of being sick and tired of our own lives and we just
give up, we know then who has
given up by the one they advocate for, even has
given place
to: Paul said; with my heart I want
to do what is right, but my flesh does what I hate: This is when God's grace is sufficient, because our hearts are right with God, but our flesh is not: There is a war going on within these temples, therefore; even as our flesh wins out
to do what we hate, our hearts are set on God and His ways which has been established in the Word of Truth, which then causes us
to stand and speak forth what we believe, even as this causes a rending
to happen within us, for Christ
to be formed in us this needs
to be, as we come up in His glories even for a better resurrection for them who believe: The heart wars against our flesh, even as Christ wars against the man of sin within: For out of the abundance of our hearts our mouth doth speak, therefore; if we speak not the Wholesome Words of our Lord, Then our hearts are still wicked: But
to advocate for wickedness instead of Christ, one has become a teacher of lawlessness, he then advocates for the man of sin: Many who have come out of
religion has done this, as they went from one mountain top «from the extreme right» of self exaltation (
Religion)
to the
other mountain top «
to the extreme left» of the (Heathen) and missed the valley in - between that is takes
to humble us: One extreme
to the
other, and missed Jesus: Jesus is taking ones through the valley's
to strip us down of all who we are before exalting us
to be just as He, even as the Christ in us overcomes that man of sin (Adam) through theses valleys of contrast that cause a rending
to happen within; and when we are rent in two, we stand on His word of truth, so we too can become one with Him, even as Jesus is with our Father: This is how Christ is formed in us: Thank - you Father; in Jesus Name Alexandria
Whether the critiques provided are correct or wrong, religious TV and media
gives us the opportunity
to reflect on our way of life and talk with
others about
religion.
So you call Muslims the Anti Christ even though he has a very high position and honor in Islam, but you don't call the
other religions Anti Christ even though they don't even
give him an honor
to begin with.
Let me add I have not seen your 3 posts asking me about how I feel about it before now when I copied and posted those above and If I had seen before I would have answered you with out any hesitation but did not because I moved
to other blogs... And
to satisfy you interest my saying I do not like it as a cultural habit but if
religion failed
to stop it and had
to regulate it then what can I do about it... people can still lie and
give you an elder age and how can you tell if 9 - 10or more at villages there are no birth certificate issued nor villagers interested
to obtain it... what can you tell from their teeth like sheep??
Then, don't have one but your
religion doesn't
give you the right
to tell
others what they can and can't have.
Just because there were (likely) more «Christians» than followers of
other religions, doesn't
give them the right
to display any symbol in a more prominent fashion than those of the
religions of any
other person that died in that event.
This column doesn't go one day without bashing Christianity while promoting the gay lifestyle and
giving a pass
to muslims, hindus and all
other religions... why do we let them get away with it?
Mormonism demands adherents» first allegiance is
to Mormonism (which isn't necessarily any different from
other religions), and ALSO
gives adherents an ethical obligation
to lie if it benefits the
religion.
This may
give them the support they need
to live their life without all the hullabaloo of
religion and free from the guilt that they may feel for realizing what does nt make sense
to them when they realize it also does nt make sense
to thousands of
others.
The government should not be permitted
to create incentives for religious practice or belief (like
giving favored status
to religious organizations, as compared
to other nonprofits),
to facilitate the religious practices of some at the expense of
others (like offering vocal prayers in public schools), or
to accommodate one
religion but not
others with similar needs or problems (like limiting draft exemptions
to members of traditional «peace churches») Within these guidelines, religious accommodations are fully in keeping with the First Amendment — albeit in conflict with strict separation.
So again we are back
to ones
religion dictating for
others how they should lead their life rather than
giving them the choice
to follow their own belief for their own life.
843 The Catholic Church recognizes in
other religions that search, among shadows and images, for the God who is unknown yet near since he
gives life and breath and all things and wants all men
to be saved.
Even beyond politics,
religion and parenting, beyond the bigness of our world and its problems,
to the smallest, most intimate of relationships, it is always powerful and life -
giving to use your words
to love each
other.
«But if we affirm Jesus» deity, don't we
give up the open - endedness with regard
to other religions?
He conveniently overlooks certain
other considerations favorable
to socialism; when these considerations are
given their due, even some practical people unafflicted by the need for a secular
religion will find the alleged superiority of capitalism something less than obvious.
In addition, Christian theologians, following Saint Paul, have extended the concept
to include
giving undue importance
to other aspects of
religion, or
to non-religious aspects of life in general, with no involvement of images specifically.
When the question is asked as
to whether or not the teachers of
other religions, such as the Buddha or Confucius, were prophets, no clear answer can be
given.
!!!! The more freedom we
give those Muslims by letting them wearing their scary Islamic clothes, opening mosques (paying no tax), shoveling their evil
religion in our throats, wanting Sharia Laws, etc. — the more problems will be caused!!!!!!!! Most Muslims are extremists, and even «moderate» Muslims still support them, so we should NOT tolerate them and we should BAN Islam unless they allow
other religious minority in their countries
to live in peace!!!!!
The discussion about the relationship of Christianity
to other religions has
given new relevance
to a long - standing dispute between the Roman Catholic and the Orthodox Churches about the relation of the Holy Spirit
to the
other two persons of the Trinity — the so - called «filioque» («and the Son») dispute.
This is what the higher
religions of man have called «sin»; it may be
given some
other name by so - called «secular» thinkers, but the fact itself is plainly
to be seen and the tragedy of it is very clear.
I am not saying that the bible doesn't contain many examples of telling the faithful
to dig deeper,
to study more & grow closer
to God through the study of the scriptures, but it NEVER says «Go ahead and study what
other religions have
to offer because it will only
give you stronger faith in the bible».
The entire basis of any
religion is for a select few
to try
to enterpret events and the words of
others to make it fit within the context of a
given religion / belief system.
If this approach is valid, then we shall have
to give greater emphasis in the church's mission,
to conversion of
religions to Christ and
to urge individuals from
other religions converted
to Christ
to stay within their religious communities and build up Christ - centred fellowships around the Bible and the Lord's Table within their religious ethos.
The point I wanted
to make is that God invites His people
to study His Word in depth,
to use the minds that He
gave us and renewed,
to gradually discover the deep levels of His progressive revelation, and
to compare the internal consistency of His message
to claims from
other religions which invariably crumble upon thoughtful analysis.
And there are still sects of this cult that secretly practice this pedo lifestyle!!!!!! And, most distressing of all,
given that we're talking about someone who could become the most powerful man in the world, the Mormon church teaches that Mormons can lie if it suits their needs
to impose their «
religion» on
others!
I've heard these very things said by those who are on the
other end of the people who use
religion and politics
to enrich themselves,
give them power and authority over their fellow human beings and draw attention
to themselves rather than
to God.
What they care about is the excuse
religion gives them
to control
other people, assume un-earned power and authority and make money.
According
to the principles of American tradition and of basic fairness, such public institutions should not
give the impression that some one
religion is the established
religion of the country, and therefore superior
to all
others...
(google pascals wager) A true christian job / duty on this earth is NOT
to FORCE his / her
religion / beliefs on anyone else... as Paul said «You must be able
to give an explanation for the JOY you have and the HOPE You have, and the FAITH you have
to others» the rest is up
to God the Holy Ghost and the person you are talking
to,
to believe, or not..
If you deem your «one true
religion»
to be better than
others, and that
gives you cause
to denigrate them, then you are no better than the Taliban.
In a 1998 exchange with Placher in the Christian Century, Gustafson charged that postliberals never
give straight answers
to questions about the historical credibility of biblical narrative or about the relation of Christian truth
to the truth of
other religions.
Any
religion that teaches hate of anything but what God hates such as fornication idolotry or murder is not a true Christian there is only one Christian faith that has never been accused of doing nothing but teach people the bible going door
to door but this is why people ridicule them for doing what the bible says they do nt charge for their material they do nt have communions they do nt pay their members for 2 years or send them
to a college for doing so they do nt pay the speakers like
other churches and they do nt hate anyone based on any reason they only
give them bible knowledge then once they know the knowledge its their choice what
to do with it.
Granted that religious forms and institutions, like
other fields of human and cultural activity, are conditioned by the nature, atmosphere, and dynamics of a
given society,
to what extent does
religion contribute
to the cohesion of a social group and
to the dynamics of its development and history?
The council I propose would certainly not be exclusively Christian but ecumenical, in the sense that it would
give a hearing
to other cosmologies and
religions.
Islam
gives its followers only the right
to call the people of
other religion to the path of Islam.
I am fine with someone wanting
to start
giving days off for Muslim holidays... just as soon as you support
giving days off for every
other religion in America.
That's exactly what's at the heart of this — that the use of public funds (e.g., tax dollars) should NOT be used
to promote (e.g., force down the throat of
others) any particular
religion or religious belief or practice — that money shouldn't be taken by non-Christians by force (via taxation) and then
given to Christians
to put up displays of Christian religious symbolism.
It's going
to be a long while before we can
give Muslims the same rights Christians and Jews have, and it's unfortunate that every time many Americans think of Islam, they picture violence and oppression instead of considering the fact that Islam is as diverse as many
other religions.
Western society, while still
giving lip - service
to religion, has evolved past the point where (for most people anyways) a satire or insult about jebus, the pope, or any
other religious or political figure is reason enough
to drawn down and start shooting.
All
other religions (including Christianity) want
to do good, help
others, be tolerant
to other religions, That is why those countries
gave rights
to muslims (France, Lebanon, India, England, now US)..
In
other words, the kind of person who
gives Christians a bad name, and why so many people abhor people like you who uses
religion to try and quash people's rights.
Then there are people like Eloise, who allow their
religion and their ignorance
to hurt
others because their beliefs
give them the false sense of superiority.
Islam is more
given to fundamentalism than
other religions with Semitic roots.