Sentences with phrase «givers not»

Buying toys online can save gift givers not only money, but time and gas, by not having to drive to a store and spend time looking for something that might not even be on the shelf.

Moreover, He is the Giver not only of the answer, but first of the prayer itself.

I am a giver not a taker.

I'm Kevin a cement Mason strong respectful a giver not a taker don't do head games despise liar's and thieves live in South Vancouver and from a big family so there was no being an asshole really love to please a lady completely and I am very very good at what I do

Im a giver n nurturer its my nature.

I am a good listener, i am a giver not a taker.I come from a lg family, I love to cook, go out to eat occasionally, stay at home and relax, watch a good show on tv.or go out dancing, to the beach, long walks or just out for a ride..

wm very clean, very sincere very caring, a giver not a taker, love to spoil that special one,, love to love that special one,, love doing things with her, love taking her places,, love lots of kisses and hugs

As a law student and an articling student and a lawyer, be a giver not a taker.

Not exact matches

The more you become a giver and not a taker.

They find great joy in random acts of kindness that lift the heart of not only the receiver but also the giver.

Other ideas: Make sure people aren't afraid to ask for help — not in a taking way, but in a manner that lets givers know where their help is most needed.

Grant suggests rewards that are substantial enough to recognize givers» efforts but not so large that they encourage takers to game the system.

Being a giver of fish rather than a teacher of fishing «is not the way to deal with poverty,» says Widmer.

«The last one that I found: Almost all of them were real givers, not just on the surface... but really passionate about giving... It was really real,» says Robbins.

And research shows that kindness not only helps the recipient, but also the giver, by reducing stress, depression and anxiety, for example.

Choosing the perfect gift can be hard — for the giver, for the recipient (who may not always like the gift, but must...

there are so much info on your site that i wonder if you have not given out all i need to learn!i mean that you are a «giver», a cheerful giver.I WILL SURELY BE YOUR MEMBER SOON.thanks and God increase you greatly

You don't have to instantly become a big giver.

The modern Santa Claus is a direct descendent of England's Father Christmas, who was not originally a gift - giver.

Further, part of a charitable act is not the benefit to the recipient, but the benefit to the soul of the giver.

Government mandated charity does not have this benefit to the giver.

It is not charity to have the government shake down the «giver» and redistribute the money.

He says in second Corinthians chapter 9 verse 7, Let each man give according as he has determined in his heart; not grudgingly, or under compulsion; for God loves a cheerful giver.

Instead I am outside with the misfits, with the rebels, the dreamers, the people of the second chance, the radical grace givers, the ones with arms wide open, the ones that you've rejected as not worthy of being listened to and I will be happy here.

God is not an «indian giver» (if you'll pardon the term).

I want to be outside with the misfits, with the rebels, the dreamers, the second - chance givers, the radical grace lavishers, the ones with arms wide open, the courageously vulnerable, and among even — or maybe especially — the ones rejected by the Table as not worthy enough or right enough.

«The faith of the prayer - giver does not matter at all,» said John Auberger, Greece's board supervisor, who began the practice shortly after taking office 1998.

You are correct, God does not the cause of death; he is the giver of life.

Again, at a stroke I've shown that it's not true that without a moral law giver there is no morality.

Not everyone is a giver, but everyone is supposed to be giving back to God a portion of what He has given to them.

Your heart is set on helping the church, thus fulfilling the second part of the command from Apostle Paul that «Each of you should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver» (2 Corinthians 9:7).

We can't control the Giver, but we can always expect one gift: the power to hope.

God is the moral life giver, not you, you know nothing.

Pastoral care - givers can not convey «a presence by means of which [others are] told that nevertheless there is meaning» unless they understand themselves as participating in a ministry not their own but Christ's.

Christocentrism has not been abated, but Christ as giver of grace is seen as author of nature and Lord of history as well.

Craig i am thinking that even though the promise hadnt been fulfilled through Christs death the act of faith is what saved them.As abraham believed God and was credited to hi mas righteousness.I was thinking though there were different dispensation periods ie pre flood enoch post flood elijah the prophets Moses the law giver and jesus all were taken up to God to heaven not just enoch so in all periods there was a representative of Christ as an example to the people of that time that the messiah was coming.brent

But this isn't quite right, for Timothy is» giver the mandate to teach in a way that brings health to people.

The previous volumes» How the Irish Saved Civilization and The Gifts of the Jews» were extremely popular, and Cahill follows the same basic format here, presenting an introductory description of the world in which the gift «giver appears, a history of the protagonist (in the first volumes a people, not an individual), and finally an assessment of the gift «giver's lasting effects on history.

He concluded that God's gifts were more important than the giver, that dependence upon God and obedience to His revealed will were not necessary.

What is important is universal participation, not the amount one gives (which is, by they way, known only to the giver and the treasurer of his or her community.

The purposes of the Law were brought to an end by the coming of our Life giver, who offered himself in place of the sacrifices in the Law, and was led like a lamb to the slaughter in place of the lamb of propitiation... He gave his blood for all mankind, so that the blood of animals should not be required of us.

Although God does not speak to Qoheleth in His role as Redeemer, His creation when experienced playfully points us to its source, God the Creator — the Giver of life 39

That was the dilemma after praying and seeking the Lord he shows me a couple of things one is God calls the shots not satan satans demons bow to Gods authority and must get his permission so they beg Jesus to send the demons into the pigs.Jesus allows it so we can see satans purpose is always to destroy life.God is still the same yesterday today and forever he is the giver of life.We do know that the pigs were owned by the gentile nations and may well have been offered or about to be offered to there gods which would mean they would belong to satan.Like the example Jesus said about taxes should he pay them and he said give to caesar what is caesars.Or the other option was that it showed Gods mercy to the man that had been healed by delivering him of the demons and he was also protecting the people in the area from the influence of the demons.So God is still the same he is unchangeable and definitely not bipolar.I would say if anyone was bipolar in this situation it is David and he like us struggled with the same choice to walk according to the flesh or walk according to the spirit of God.brentnz

The Torah is not an objective law independent of man's actual relationship to God: it bestows life only on those who receive it in association with its Giver, and for His sake.

Secondly you state that without a divine law giver, humans can not determine good from evil.

If you say, «by chance», you are godless, because you do not acknowledge the Creator, nor give thanks to the Giver?

We had hated writing thank - you notes, so we let our children slide, effectively teaching them that their pleasure, their receiving, was all that mattered; they didn't have to take into account the feelings of the giver or participate in the basic human ritual of reciprocity if they didn't want to.

To some especially «liberated» readers, the self - sacrificing behavior of the tree will seem perverse: Why does she not give only of her surplus, in a giving that does not exhaust the giver, in a giving that does not destroy the possibility of future giving?

To give without qualification is defective not because it gains nothing in return for the giver but because it may be harmful to the recipient.

Many people do not even recognize this as a problem: surely if we grant the sacred authority of meaning - giver to Jesus then we must also recognize the authority of the book which tells his story!