Sentences with phrase «gives cool effect»

Colored pencils give a cool effect, too.

I love bases that give me a cooling effect before I apply foundation < 3

It gave me a cooling effect.

Not exact matches

One of the cool side effects of welcoming customers into his home, Blumenthal says, is it gave the customers a rare opportunity to «peek behind the curtain» of a start - up, while simultaneously giving the founders a rare opportunity to get immediate feedback from customers.

It also focuses really fast and gives some cool background bokeh effects.

wide - angle lenses give some really cool looking effects so shooting video with this one is going to produce some really cool results.

The expectation is that the current El Niño will give way to La Niña later this year, and La Niña has a cooling effect.

Giving buildings cool - surface makeovers counters the urban heat island effect and reduces the temperature inside a building.

At any given time, clouds cover about 70 percent of the Earth's surface and together produce a net cooling effect on the planet.

Hurricanes also cool reefs with their broad cloud cover and the effect seems to be strongest to the left of a given storm's track for reasons that remain a mystery.

There is a lot of water down there now, but given the fact that parts of the continent are getting cooler and parts are getting warmers, plus the effects on air currents, etc. this seems like an interesting question to answer.

For me, I find that coconut oil works well for me in the summer — which makes sense given that Ayurvedic healing considers coconut oil to have a cooling effect on the body.

The magnet deepens the polish to a rich brown, and the wave pattern gives it a cool cats - eye cabochon effect.

The lotion soaks in really fast and well, and gives an instant cooling effect when applied.

Unzipped it gives that draped look, and then zipped up fully you get a cool cowl neck effect.

Give your style an edgy effect in these ASH - X skinny moto jeans from Buffalo David Bitton that are styled with zip front pockets and a cool coated finish on their stretch denim construction.

I mix it with a tiny drop of water which gives it a heating effect (perfect to warm you up for cool winter mornings), I usually leave it on for about 10 - 15 minutes while I make my peppermint tea and rinse it off right before getting in the shower.

The see - through material gives such a cool effect when you're walking and the colors are extra gorgeous when they catch the sunlight.

The glare had such a cool effect and gave these photos a soft pink glow.

Because of this, the polish really comes to life outdoors; indoors, the holo effect doesn't really happen at all, it's just the golden shimmer, which gives it a metallic look and is actually pretty cool.

Cucumber gives skin a cooling and hydrating effect making it soft and supple.

The Stretch Knit Black Mesh Fabric upper offers a cooling effect for your feet and the memory foam heel cup is great at giving a

I give them credit for actually realizing the best possible creation which do could never be more the a great Act I, few good one liners, cool special effects in the conflict resolution in Act III.

While we don't want to give too many details away and spoil the upcoming movie, we can say that the footage looked very interesting and the effects were super cool.

Honestly, this seems pretty muddled, and given that Woo hasn't spent his career returning to it (apart from the doves, which I think is just a cool effect that wouldn't work as well with, say, pigeons), I'd suggest it isn't very deeply felt.

It gives us a lot more opportunity for really cool effects and things we want to do.

The five ventilation outlets in silver shadow, with their metallic cool - touch effect like the majority of the controls, oppose against the warm look of genuine veneer and give an impression of high quality.

All trim surfaces feature an electroplated finish in «silver chrome», giving them a genuine metallic surface with «cool touch» effect.

The cooling effect of direct fuel injection also ensures a compression ratio quite unusual on a turbocharged engine, helping to give the engine an even higher level of all - round efficiency.

It's unclear how much control this actually gives of those apps (I would love to be able to kill apps through a long press) but the effect looks pretty cool.

Dead Effect 2 also features PVP multiplayer, which sounds cool, but (in my experience) had literally zero players at any given time.

Assigning pressens to the strings of X and Y buttons in combos offers different effects so with your first strike you may break their defense, your second strike will give you some health back, your third strike will give you a timer cool down, or maybe all of your hits will do the same thing.

It's got cool character designs, definitely cool maze layouts with some very nice details such as background animations, flame effects, and it always seems like there is something moving on the screen which again is a great little addition as it really gives the whole game a sense of life.

The effect is pretty remarkable — although nothing flies out of the screen, it gives the playing field a sense of depth that is incredibly cool.

This game is hellbent on providing opportunities to show off its particle effects and explosive environments and to give the player lots of opportunity to thrash some robots around, and that's cool.

Machu Picchu (2010) is at high temperature, with saturated oranges and yellows interpenetrating and seeming to give off waves of energy; in Aquifer (2010), we get a similar effect, but cool, all blues and pinkish purples engaged in a calm flowing back - and - forth, like a sea just past dusk.

Given the slow rate of temperature changes for large bodies of water and the tiny hypothetical effect of a cooler sun, I doubt that rates of ocean acidification would be affected much, but there would be some effect.

There could still be regional cooling in places like in the north Atlantic, which could slowdown melting on Greenland, and give the world an opportunity to take advantage by putting the reduction of GHGs on the front burner asap to mitigate the effects of albedo reduction and sea level rise from that source, when the heat returns.

The picture I gave neglects the effect of ocean dynamics — cooling by upwelled water entering the mixed layer and warming by imported warm water from the side.

This doesn't contradict the argument that, given present amounts, doubling CO2 should cause stratospheric cooling even without solar heating of the stratosphere (with the effect in the far wings being the opposite, and with the effect at the center of the band being restricted towards TOA).

It is conceivable that aerosol effects (which includes «smoke») could also affect the lapse rate, but the aerosols tend to warm where they are located and depending on the composition, cool below — this gives an impact that — if it was a large factor in the tropical mean — would produce changes even larger than predicted from the moist adiabatic theory.

The MM was also a time of enhanced volcanic activity, and the cooling from this was probably comparable with the cooling due to solar effects (an exact attribution is impossible given the uncertainties in both forcings).

Re my 441 — competing bands — To clarify, the absorption of each band adds to a warming effect of the surface + troposphere; given those temperatures, there are different equilibrium profiles of the stratosphere (and different radiative heating and cooling rates in the troposphere, etc.) for different amounts of absorption at different wavelengths; the bands with absorption «pull» on the temperature profile toward their equilibria; disequilibrium at individual bands is balanced over the whole spectrum (with zero net LW cooling, or net LW cooling that balances convective and solar heating).

Since aerosols last much longer in the stratosphere than they do in the rainy troposphere, the amount of aerosol - forming substance that would need to be injected into the stratosphere annually is far less than what would be needed to give a similar cooling effect in the troposphere, though so far as the stratospheric aerosol burden goes, it would still be a bit like making the Earth a permanently volcanic planet (think of a Pinatubo or two a year, forever).

However, mega-eruptions or a series of eruptions can have a cooling effect that take decades to wear off, giving a perceived warming effect.

But the utter incoherence of views presented by deniers gives the game away even so (it's cooling, it's warming but the sun is responsible, it's warming but some unknown natural cycle is responsible, the «greenhouse» effect violates the laws of thermodynamics, but somehow the energy radiated back to the surface by the atmosphere simply vanishes, there is a greenhouse effect but negative feed - backs make it negligible, & c ad nauseam).

On a global scale, the cooling effect of carbon sequestration dominates and, in this work, afforestation of all the climatically viable cropland gave a global temperature reduction of 0.45 oC by the end of this century.

Then, after giving a talk to the Bush - Cheney White House, he agonized about whether he should have ignored the cooling effects of aerosols because it gave Cheney an «out,» enabling him and others to make the specious argument that aerosols somehow balance out the trillions of tons of CO2 emitted every year.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

CO2 doesn't give» greenhouse effect» — normal / honest greenhouse has SOLID plastic or glass roof — on the other hand CO2 is only 270 - 500ppm = CO2 would be as fishnet as roof, or a postage stamp as roof # 2: normal / honest greenhouse has solidly attached roof, on the other hand, when CO2 warms up - > instantly goes high up to higher altitude, where is colder and cooling much more efficient / after all CO2 is 2/3 made from oxygen = lying that CO2 is a greenhouse gas is destructive for the society and environment.