Christine Negroni, author of «The Crash Detectives»
gives her hypothesis on what may have been the probable cause of the disappearance of Malaysia Air Flight 370 three years after the tragedy.
Not exact matches
Bruno, a Dominican friar, held to all sorts of novel, and non - Christian, opinions
on faith,
giving credence more to exotic ancient - Egyptian beliefs than to orthodox Christology; and while he also followed a number of astronomy
hypotheses, such as the existence of a plurality of worlds, yet it was not this that sealed his unfortunate fate.
«37 Thus, there is an identification of the shining present (i.e., the datum self) with the
given (lower case «g»), while The Given is the given plus all our hypotheses, analyses, inferences and abstractions tacked on, along with whatever else toward which we are pas
given (lower case «g»), while The
Given is the given plus all our hypotheses, analyses, inferences and abstractions tacked on, along with whatever else toward which we are pas
Given is the
given plus all our hypotheses, analyses, inferences and abstractions tacked on, along with whatever else toward which we are pas
given plus all our
hypotheses, analyses, inferences and abstractions tacked
on, along with whatever else toward which we are passive.
These difficulties facing the classical atomic theory are well known: secondary qualities remain inexplicable; no meaning can be
given to the notion of an external world outside of the sense organs of the observer; organic time must be reversible — which it is not; we can never choose among
hypotheses, since all of our mental states follow «from necessity,» so we don't have theories, but can only report autobiographies, and so
on.
The effect of all this is to throw into relief the results, and especially the theological results, of the work done
on the basis of a
given hypothesis of gospel interrelationships as the only effective test of the validity of that
hypothesis.
The claim states a conclusion based
on archeological discovery of bones for a
given period not over all time hence its an incomplete
hypothesis got a clue, obviously logic isn't one of your strengths.
I shall assume that the aim of an explication of «valid induction» is to find a numerical or comparative function c (h, e)-- the «confirmation of
hypothesis h
given evidence e» — which is a syntactic function of the statements h and e, and which has a high or comparatively high value in those cases where normally accepted or intuitive inductive methods would direct us to accept
hypothesis h
on evidence e, at least in comparison with other
hypotheses having lower c - value.
His
hypothesis is that slow development and often even cultural decay are the fruits of this bifurcation, whereas the inadvertent wedding of these two disparate functions of reason during the last century and a half have produced an unprecedented cultural advance: imagination now focused
on the improvement of technique; technique guided, illuminated, and immeasurably enhanced through experiment with imaginative alternatives to the
given and the known (FR 42).
Just
give us a little synopsis
on the peer reviewed proof you have of your god
hypothesis.
They tested their
hypothesis by selecting 600 babies deemed high risk for peanut allergies, and
giving half Bamba
on a regular basis, while the other half avoided peanut - based foods altogether.
Moreover, information
on breast feeding was
given prospectively and the examiners did not know the duration of breast feeding, nor were they aware of the
hypothesis.
Given that the salinity crisis was capable of generating these changes in pressure, the geologists — working
on the
hypothesis that the Mediterranean dried out — studied the changes in volcanic activity during this period.
When should a scientist
give up
on a
hypothesis they believe?
Their dual training
gives them a unique perspective: Well - trained physician - scientists have the experience and instincts to observe clinical syndromes, reflect
on symptoms in the light of fundamental biological science, and pursue the study of those diseases through
hypothesis - driven research.
The dearth of evidence
on - site
gave rise to various explanatory
hypotheses.
Given the extensive publicity the case attracted and the fact that the murder charge carried a possible death penalty, prosecutors hired Lentini and John DeHaan, coauthor of a standard fire investigation text, to double - check and rule out other possibilities — including the
hypothesis that one of the kids, playing with matches, had started the fire
on a couch.
«My
hypothesis is that the degree to which the root cause of a
given disease is understood and the degree to which that disease is treatable will have a big impact
on the kinds of medical discoveries which generate the greatest online attention.
He calls
on Congress to take 5 % to 10 % of the funds that the United States
gives to IPCC (which have averaged about $ 3 million annually over the last decade) and dedicate it to «a group of well - credentialed scientists to produce an assessment that expresses legitimate, alternative
hypotheses that have been (in their view) marginalized, misrepresented or ignored in previous IPCC reports (and thus EPA and National Climate Assessments).
Our
hypothesis was that you choose based
on a strategy that minimizes the error at the target while
giving yourself the greatest room for error at the release.»
It is known under the names Little Dumbbell Nebula (the most common), Cork Nebula, Butterfly Nebula, and Barbell Nebula, and it was
given two NGC numbers as it was suspected to be a double nebula with two components in contact, a
hypothesis brought up by William Herschel, who numbered the «second component» H I. 193
on November 12, 1787.
His 2015 book «Magicians of the Gods» is based
on the
Hypothesis, and he
gives credit to Kennett, Bunch, Allen West «and the gang».
Explaining the importance of this new findings, Dr Barton Haynes of Duke Human Vaccine Institute, USA, who was part of the leading team, said that biomarkers or correlates have
given them directions, signals
on the
hypothesis.
But a new discovery puts humans
on the coast of British Columbia, Canada, earlier than researchers previously thought — and the facts from these findings
give further weight to the
hypothesis that humans might not have arrived here
on foot.
One
hypothesis, for example, is that retesting reduces the pressure to unduly focus teaching effort
on the marginal students — students who may or may not pass — in the months before the initial test, and thus teachers can
give relatively more effort to the infra - marginal students, including those high - achieving students at little risk of failing.
Funded time would be
given to write a dissertation exploring this area of interest, finalise their journey to master's qualification and thus feed back into the system research carried out by a practising teacher based
on real - life examples which support their
hypotheses.
This module
gives examples of school data and how to record, organise, examine, make inferences and test
hypotheses with data, and shows how you can focus
on your purpose for using the data available to you.
If students are having trouble formulating
hypotheses, they can refer to that portion of the scoring guide as they differentiate between strong and weak examples of
hypotheses, practice drafting
hypotheses,
give one another descriptive feedback
on their drafts, and assess their own drafts» strengths and weaknesses.
On their worksheet they were
given a question,
hypothesis and experiment.
«This book reminds us that we need to go back to models of learning and use them to help students see similarities and differences, learn how to summarize and take notes, practice deliberately, use imagery to build a deeper conceptual understanding
on which they can «hang» surface level knowledge, learn from one another, solve problems, generate and test
hypotheses, and
give and receive feedback,» wrote education professor and author John Hattie in his foreword to the publication.
Funded time would be
given to write a dissertation exploring this area of interest (this could contribute towards Master's qualification or Chartered Teacher Status) and thus feed back into the system research carried out by a practising teacher based
on real - life examples which support their
hypotheses.
Aside from that, I am
giving a talk
on the Efficient Markets
Hypothesis in New York City
on Wednesday to the Society of Actuaries.
Your
hypothesis that the record of global mean temperatures might have been affected by the odd warm hour
on a spring day here and there has a very low probability of being correct,
given the vast amount of data that goes into the global mean, from stations in all pats of the world (from the fully dark Antarctic winter days to the fully illuminated Arctic summers, desert and equatorial forest sites etc etc).
Noah says:
Given that global raining is «unequivocal», and the ark is sailing around the world, the null
hypothesis should now be reversed, thereby placing the burden of proof
on showing that there is no human influence.
Given that global warming is «unequivocal», and is «very likely» due to human activities to quote the 2007 IPCC report, the null
hypothesis should now be reversed, thereby placing the burden of proof
on showing that there is no human influence.
In the main text of the paper he says «
Given that global warming is «unequivocal», and is «very likely» due to human activities to quote the 2007 IPCC report, the null
hypothesis should now be reversed, thereby placing the burden of proof
on showing that there is no human influence.»
You forced me to do Google
on [Fisher «null
hypothesis» nullify] and turned up a number of references (including Wikipedia) but this one
gives some explicit references to Fisher's work and is a useful discussion of some of the issues being discussed
on this thread http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/2/Topic8c.pdf
If the as - stated formulation is correct, namely
Given that global warming is «unequivocal», to quote the 2007 IPCC report, the null
hypothesis should now be reversed, thereby placing the burden of proof
on showing that there is no human influence.
Given that global cooling is «unequivocal», to quote any magic report, the null
hypothesis should now be reversed, thereby placing the burden of proof
on showing that there is no human influence.
- Finally I'd address the duplicity (if I may call it that) in Trenberths statement: «
Given that global warming is «unequivocal», to quote the 2007 IPCC report, the null
hypothesis should now be reversed, thereby placing the burden of proof
on showing that there is no human influence.
So with the understanding that I sure as hell know what pervasive influence peddling can do to the process of peer review — because the pharma companies do actively recruit their «key opinion leaders»
on the basis of things like editorial clout and that prominence within their specialty which
gives them to hold responsibilities in peer review for «high impact» medical journals — you might appreciate why, when I got to read those e-mails in the FOI2009.zip archive last November, my immediate desire was for something brutally Sicilian to happen immediately and with spatter marks
on the surrounding walls to the C.R.U. correspondents who had been concerting to infest and pervert the peer review process throughout the physical sciences wherever anything critical of the AGW
hypothesis might be brought into publication.
And while we are
on the subject, can you
give us one, just one, piece of empirical evidence to support the anthropogenic global warming
hypothesis.
(4) Spending trillions of dollars rebuilding the energy generation and distribution system
on the basis of a failed
hypothesis is insane, especially
given all the other useful purposes that it could be spent
on (assuming we even had it).
Were the
hypothesis that warming will increase at least 1C / decade averaged over a millennium at 95 % confidence, nineteen times in twenty,
given the noise in the signal, all other things being equal, we'd first need 17 years at least to get some kinda sketchy data, and then could begin calculating from the set of subsequent running or independent 17 year spans (a different calculation for each, depending
on the PDF) the probability that a -20 C decade would be consistent with a +1 C / decade
hypothesis.
So, the desktop / email password
hypothesis was born and I
gave up
on central access, in spite of the problems with it that you point out (except finding an RC password for Nov. 17).
The notes
on this point are self - contradictory: This derivation of [CO2](t) does not assume any
given equilibrium between ingress and egress...» ANSWER: the only assumption made is that absorption is proportional to the CO2 content of the air; it applies equally to the both parts or sets of molecules of the air, the anthropic (24 ppm) and the natural (376 ppm); this makes NO
hypothesis about ingress»
I have read all of Wolf's papers and books [actually have almost all of them at home] and it is clear that he
gave up
on his
hypothesis.
Since the memes of the IPCC have not shown any tendency to change in response to current short term movements in the global temperature metric, any longer term trend remains moot, as it should be expected,
given the absence of testable
hypotheses on natural variability.
Lolwot, I do not expect IPCC to
give much weight or credence to any
hypothesis, which conflicts with its myopic fixation
on human GHGs as the cause for all climate change — do you?
Moreover, whilst there may be a large volume of information relating to the [
hypothesis] at hand, it may
on the whole be only of partial relevance, incomplete and / or uncertain, or even conflicting in terms of the level of support it provides for a
given interpreation.
Since a basic North American continental experiment was already successfully executed
on the few post 911 clear sky days, I posit that simple solar L1 irradiance modification experiments could be designed to test the
hypothesis without any serious side effects (certainly without moving an asteroid) to successfully obtain the desired data to enable more permanent temporary solutions, and in order to
give us more time to develop the necessary carbon dioxide removal and sequestration schemes — aka carbon containing products).