A Patent Assignment
gives patent owners the option of retaining part of their rights.
Not exact matches
The original
patent owner will lose all rights to the
patent because its title is
given to the buyer.
The
owner gave the slave his freedom in exchange for the «recipe» so he could
patent it.
Independent of whether I can get away with using figures from
patents it is important for me to know the
owner of the copyright in order to
give proper credits.
Indirect utilisation means, for example, that the
owner gives a license to a manufacturer in order to produce and sell products that are protected by a
patent of the
owner.
Although the Federal Circuit recently determined that the PTAB can no longer place the burden of establishing the patentability of amended claims on the
patent owner in IPR proceedings, [1]
patent owners may want to consider pursuing alternative claims in a reissue proceeding,
given the ex parte nature and procedural flexibility that reissue offers.
The court found CIPO incorrectly put too much weight on a
patent agent ignoring CIPO's notice regarding non-payment, as well as possible prejudice to 3rd parties, including the
owner of the «wrong
patent» whose fees had been paid,
given this «wrong
patent» had now expired.
The VENUE Act addresses one root cause of many of the
patent system's shortcomings: the fact that
patent owners can file litigation in whatever forum they think will
give them the greatest advantage.
Software
patents are an attractive tool for
patent trolls because they are notoriously difficult to interpret —
giving unscrupulous
patent owners the ability to claim that their
patent covers a wide range of technology.
That's because a lot of the time, the university is still listed as the
owner of the
patent, but it
gives the troll a broad, exclusive license to litigate it.
Given the costs of litigation in court or at the
Patent Office, a patent owner can sue on a «presumed valid» patent and use the threat of fees and costs to get an undeserved settl
Patent Office, a
patent owner can sue on a «presumed valid» patent and use the threat of fees and costs to get an undeserved settl
patent owner can sue on a «presumed valid»
patent and use the threat of fees and costs to get an undeserved settl
patent and use the threat of fees and costs to get an undeserved settlement.
To make things worse, the claims in software
patents (this is the language that is supposed to mark the boundaries of the invention) are often vague and overbroad —
giving unscrupulous
patent owners the ability to claim that their
patent covers a wide range of technology.
The Federal Circuit said that there was «no sound reason» for a distinction that
gives less control to a
patent owner that makes products to one that merely licenses its
patent.