Sentences with phrase «gives the temperature required»

Not exact matches

when they warmed his body and gave him oxygen on the way to the hospital he woke up, everyone screamed it's a miracle... then science had to step in and explain it wasn't a miracle, the temperature of the water lowered his core temperature so low that his body required less oxygen, thus he didn't recieve enough brain damage to cease funtioning.

Continuity of care midwife, great relationship with knowledgeable midwife, lots of interaction and talking with children about birth and baby, stand ing strong in the face of medical opposition, eating vegies and staying away from sugar and carbs, empowered by Blessingway ceremony, contractions started and stopped, sleep in between, wanting pool but clear about at what temperature, different kind of pushing, more power required and more lucidity, her body knew how to give birth and her baby knew how to be born

We didn't do straight from the fridge: a) because that would require getting out of bed (my son slept in our room and given that I have awful insomnia, I was loathe to leave the bedroom and turn on the lights); and b) my son wouldn't drink COLD milk (though room temperature worked fine).

What's more, they gave up this extra cellulose without the expensive high - temperature processing usually required to remove the lignin prior to fermenting biofuels.

It is important to find out if the airline requires that your veterinarian give a precise acclimation temperature, such as 20 °F -LRB--7 °C) for a specified period of time.

The hotel also has an indoor pool, a nice plus given that summertime fog can keep temperatures on the cool side, and swimming in the chilly Pacific typically requires a wetsuit.

UV January # 52 Thomas says: 5 Jan 2018 at 5:38 PM Quoting Published Peer - Reviewed Science Papers: «Our results suggest that achieving any given global temperature stabilization target will require steeper greenhouse gas emissions reductions than previously calculated.»

If the predicted cooling by la Nina had not occurred then 2008 would probably have been the same temperature (given the uncertainties) as every year since 2001 and that in itself would require explanation.I am broadly in favour of the global warmingCO2 hypothesis but I know it is just that, a hypothesis — and that needs testing against real observations in the physical world.

Given the huge pile of evidence that can be traced to rising temperature, perhaps some see the case as requiring repeated hammering on rock hard heads with the rock hard data.

Their approach requires an estimate of the forced global mean temperature in a given year (excluding any natural variability), which are derived from Otto et al (2015), who employ a regression approach to reconstruct a prediction of global mean temperatures as a function of anthropogenic and natural forcing agents.

HOWEVER, when you apply the laws of physics to the new end state, ie globe warmed by a few degrees by GHGs, you get a situation where the new Wiens law value (higher driving temperature gives hotter energy spectrum out) and the new Stefan - Boltzmann value, (ie HIGHER energy out) disagree with the physical situation that the model REQUIRES — ie energy out = 99.98 units which is LOWER.

If a given quantity of heat were injected into the environment, some going into the air and some going into the water, what is the length of time required for the temperature / s to return to the starting point?

«Our results suggest that achieving any given global temperature stabilization target will require steeper greenhouse gas emissions reductions than previously calculated,» Brown and Caldeira wrote in the study.

Given the statistical uncertainty in determining pre-1800s temperatures (see graph below) that requires greater than 50 % of the warming be attributed to anthropogenic factors.

Given a temperature anomaly of 0.6 C which is about right for SST, the excess forcing required is about 1.6 watts / m ^ 2.

Given that the energy required to melt a mass of ice would be enough to raise the temperature of the same mass of water by 80 deg C, the latter seems to be the very much more likely explanation.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

(For a given location on Earth's surface, the highest daily temperatures are achieved just after the period of greatest insolation, since time is required to heat the ocean surface waters and the soil.)

As Chris Ho - Stuart has pointed out below the divergences between the various temperature datasets in the past decade or so are as large as the divergence in the SST dataset that would be required to explain the two features that have given rise to the apparently similar length warming trend of 1910 - 1940.

The only comment I agree with is that the shell does not transfer «heat» to the sphere (by definition of heat transfer), but it does cause the sphere to heat up due to the transfer of back radiation energy (you can have energy transfer both ways, but heat transfer only refers to NET energy transfer), and this requires a higher sphere equilibrium temperature for a given energy net transfer for net energy balance.

Given the substantial OHC rise during the interval, It would require an extremely high climate sensitivity to allow for more than a 0.1 C contribution, and that would itself be hard to reconcile with the total temperature rise and CO2 forcing data.

My point at that time was that the number of CRN 1 and CRN 2 stations was very small and that given the noisy data for temperature trends amongst even closer spaced stations meant that in order to see a statistically significant difference due to CRN rating would require a very large difference in trends or a larger number of stations in those classifications.

If the actual temperature as represented by mesurement A is just as likely to be too high as too low then the data is unbiased and we can average it with other measurements and, given enough such measurements we can even come up with averages of greater accuracy than the individual measurements (though that's tricky and requires further examination of what sort of unbiasness we're dealing with.)

Finally, satellites do not pass over a given point on the Earth at the same time each day (let alone punctually at the time of minimum and maximum temperatures), thereby requiring a continuous Time of Observation adjustment every day.

The CO2 increment required to yield a given PETM warming above the pre-PETM temperature (25.7 °C) is obtained by subtracting the CO2 amount at the desired Ts from the CO2 at Ts = 25.7 °C.

The higher (full Russell) sensitivity requires much less CO2 change to produce the Mid-Miocene warming for two reasons: (i) the greater temperature change for a specified forcing and (ii) the smaller CO2 change required to yield a given forcing from the lesser CO2 level of the higher sensitivity case.

It considers the inversion of the temperature series (Hadcrut3 used in the aericle) to the input flux forcings i.e. the flux required to give us the exact reproduction of the temperature series, using in this instance the same assumed sensitivity as the GISS - ER model.

More cooling would require more convection to maintain a given lapse rate; less CAPE would imply that more convection is having a bigger impact on the tropical temperature profile.

What I am giving in my plan / proposal are the temperature targets required to offer any chance of avoiding catastrophe, and the components required to meet these targets.

[Response: I'm skeptical about methane for the PETM myself, in that the temperature change and pH change seems to require more CO2 than the isotope spike will give you, if it's methane.

When considering the distance required to travel to the classroom, many options are eliminated without giving them a second thought unless you really want to see the sites and hear the sounds of Texas during extremely high temperatures.

• Report to clinical coordinator or practice administrator • Perform nursing procedures under supervision of physician or physician assistant • Assist physician and physician assistant in exam rooms • Escort patients to exam rooms, interviews patients, measure vital signs, including weight, blood pressure, pulse, temperature, and document all information in patient's chart • Give instructions to patients as instructed by physician or physician assistant • Ensure all related reports, labs and information is filed is available in patients» medical records prior to their appointment • Keep exam rooms stocked with adequate medical supplies, maintain instruments, prepare sterilization as required • Take telephone messages and provide feedback and answers to patient / physician / pharmacy calls • Triage and process messages from patients and front office staff to physicians and physician assistants • Maintain all logs and required checks (i.e. refrigerator temperatures, emergency medications, expired medications, oxygen, cold sterilization fluid change, etc.) • All other duties as assigned by clinical coordinator or practice administrator