Sentences with phrase «giving answer to that need»

It is a project that arises the illusion of generating a change, making visible the need of emotional education and giving answer to that need in the childhood.

Not exact matches

All these questions need to be given some thought as the answers could be the driving force behind your ecommerce site.
Jeff Widman, CEO of Brand Glue, a consulting company based in Mountain View, California, offers the advice to «Put the question first, rather than last» and to «ask a question where people don't need to click through a link to give you an answer
One common misconception of accelerator programs is that the advisors will give participants all the answers they need to succeed.
«Ask a question where people don't need to click through a link to give you an answer
When spending the requisite time analyzing your staff and looking for gaps, don't forget that you need to treat your best employees very well, so that when they receive a call from a recruiter, or are approached by a rival CEO, the only answer they'll feel obliged to give is a firm «Thanks, but no thanks.»
The transformation is set to give U.S. diplomacy considerably more clout, lessening the dependence on Middle Eastern oil and making the U.S. the answer to some developing nations» most pressing needs.
Watson also works with «story templates,» which give users access to standard questions that most businesses need answered.
This strategy was simple: to earn back our trust, the company needed to give honest answers to some tough questions.
They'll answer your questions and give you the information you need to decide whether an Anago Cleaning Systems cleaning franchise is the right choice for you!
In some cases, the best answer we can give is that to be most effective in your particular position, you need to accept this as a new reality and work with it, rather than fighting what's changing.»
While you don't have to answer them all, gathering details on as many of them as possible will give you the information needed to write high - converting copy, as well as give you an edge over competitors who haven't gone to such lengths to understand your shared audience.
To give you an exact answer, I'd need more data, but generally speaking, because, during 2015, you and / or your spouse were covered under an employer's plan at work, you will be subject to the deduction phase out ruleTo give you an exact answer, I'd need more data, but generally speaking, because, during 2015, you and / or your spouse were covered under an employer's plan at work, you will be subject to the deduction phase out ruleto the deduction phase out rules.
if something happened to either himself or Charlie but given Simpson was just six years his junior, «a different answer» was needed for the long - term.
When asked how come Tellus is now hosted by Stellar instead of Ethereum, given the fact that Ethereum has the needed flexibility in its programming ledger while Stellar does not, Irene Energy answered that they do not need those type of services in order to operate properly.
Infinit Finance and Accounting is at the forefront of providing new answers to your complicated needs, and its experience with accounts receivable outsourcing gives it valuable insights that can provide novel solutions which in turn give stellar results.
This feedback is to let you know whether you are hitting your marks and to alert you to things to be aware of to change for future shops (like punctuation errors or if you need to give more information to clarify your answer).
The problem is this: when prayer is born of urgency, we're dictating the questions God needs to answer rather than listening for the counsel He wants to give.
And yet when it comes down to the final moments, when it gets real, when we have no more need for the societal benefits of religious posturing, we learn what is really most important, and the answer (given the real purpose of life, see above) is what we should reasonably expect: family.
... The Jews (just like the church now) got flippant concerning divorce... I feel Jesus didn't have to mention homosexuality because the Law was clear to any Jew at that time... Paul had to mention it because he was an apostle to the Gentiles who I think were more prone to homosexuality behavior... I'm though not as learned as you... just my thought after 15 years of thinking about this issue... The church has a sacred duty to all... even gays... we need a unified loving answer to give them... but it must be the truth... because only the truth can set us free...
I'm not saying I have all the answers, but as a starting place, it seems like maybe people need to look at what they have, what they are giving up, what they want / need, what they gave away and maybe want back (souls do come to mind, btw Dave), and basically see if they are holding on to things that don't fit anymore.
All you have to do is just give them a hug because they're still waiting for answers, thinking, wishing, hoping and they all need comfort - the survivors and neighbours.»
As I write about the violence of God in the Bible and have conversations about this with various people I interact with during the week, I often tell people that one of the reasons this is such an important topic is because Christians need a better answer to provide the world than the ones we have always given.
The hard truth is that we don't have every answer or need to give answers that are defensive and out of context to prove a point.
To answer this question we need to consult the descriptions of nonsocial nexus which Whitehead gives: «The characteristic of a living society is that a complex structure of inorganic societies is woven together for the production of a non-social nexus characterized by the intense physical feelings of its members» (PR 161To answer this question we need to consult the descriptions of nonsocial nexus which Whitehead gives: «The characteristic of a living society is that a complex structure of inorganic societies is woven together for the production of a non-social nexus characterized by the intense physical feelings of its members» (PR 161to consult the descriptions of nonsocial nexus which Whitehead gives: «The characteristic of a living society is that a complex structure of inorganic societies is woven together for the production of a non-social nexus characterized by the intense physical feelings of its members» (PR 161).
It's never wrong to ask for the particulars, but even when we ask, we need to know that He may or may not give us the answers.
Calvin's answer is clear: the inner, objective witness of the Holy Spirit to the Word.67 Here is the God - given certainty that faith needs.
As far as attending the marriage ceremony of gay people i have two points of view the first is that that is there choice to live how they want to but to me that is clearly not Gods best and sin is sin and needs to be repented of but that is my standard not theres.As far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentnz
and also if i have and your answer is yes then if there is a way to get the holy spirit back then please tell me and also please pray for me for a few days and i also want to know that really is the unforgivable sin unforgivable and really i swear on my mother that i don't want to go to hell forever and i am very scared of it please help me urgent and also i am sending a friend request to you on facebook and please accept it so that we can talk on this matter together and also i think you will like my page and i couldn't sleep properly because of this and in my half sleep in my dreams i was just visiting your website and finding my comment missing and i as pleasing god and the holy spirit but as i was receiving my spirit again and again as i mentioned this in my previous comment i was abusing in my mind i couldn't stop abusing and i have a very good mother she tried to wake me but i told her not to do and it was happening same things again and again and i told my mother again the half truth because i don't want to break her heart and she told me that there is nothing like ghosts and they are making me fools (you all) and i am telling you honestly before this i irritate my mother a lot i just watch tv and surf the internet or play games in my pc and i eat and brush late and also don't listen to my parents but after i saw your website i became obedient for a few days and again the same i am disobedient your webpage or article ruined my life but this is not your fault and now days i am buy searching about this topic and my father (Vivek Saraf) broke his hands on the 6th May while riding at a very high speed he normally don't go at a very high speed but he had a very important work so whole he was riding a dog was running on the way and to save his life he gave a very hard brake and he with his nebiour fall down and got injuries in his legs and broke his hands and at first he walked with difficulty and then the local people helped him on his way and took him to the local hospital but the doctor told that we need to go to Kollkata (the capital of west bengal, India) and so he went with his loyal staff because he is a business man and in the hospital he got cured but he still have the fracture in his hands so i request you to pray for him and his negibour also and i will tell you the rest in facebook bye and sorry for spelling mistakes in my previous comments.
When his disciples finally approach him at the end of the day with the logical, intelligent suggestion that he dismiss the crowd so they may go find some food, Jesus answers, «They need not go away; you give them something to eat.»
The truth is that science has given us the answers to many of the previous needs for a god, and now that the «church» is threatened by rationality of thought and reason of science, they are taking a harder stand against atheism.
Most of us have found that place somewhere on the far side of a shadowy valley that stretched from the wreck of our own first naïveté to the point where we finally gave up the need for sure answers to every question.
From another perspective if satan was his father it is to easy to apportion the blame to him i couldnt help it as my father is satan the truth is every one of us has sinned and fallen short and so we are responsible for our actions just the same as Cain.The devil did nt make him do it he influenced his evil thoughts no doubt but the decision to kill his brother was his alone.Its the same arguement because of my parents because of my upbringing i couldnt help myself we all need to take responsibility for our own actions.If we are honest we choose to sin because we like to sin that is our nature our hearts are deceitfully wicked.Whats the answer repent and submit yourselves to God so that he can give us new hearts that do nt want to sin but want to please God.brentnz
people wander into Church looking for answers to BIG questions we simply placate them and give them a quick shot of, «Jesus loves you» so there is no need to worry.
In this magazine we argue that a key problem behind all this has been downplaying the need to update the answers given to catechetical questions at all levels.
Science and religion do come together «in persons», but it needs to be in persons who can give answers to a sceptical world and restore the full Catholic vision of Creation in Christ.
Sometimes the conversion starts not with faith, but with a desire to believe: «God if you do exist, and if you do answer prayers, give me the help I need
The me who came back from her tax appointment last night thinking WHAT am I doing?!? A question I really need a good answer to given the amount of people asking me, «Your book is written!
If you need a better answer you can post your question in the forums and someone there might be able to give you an exact time frame.
The answer for me is yes, what is needed for the team is to give its all out in those games.
That will give you all the answers you need as to why Wenger has not won it.
That gives you your answer he need to bow out gracefully.
Is he going or staying we all need to know, chile duties are over now time to give us an answer?
If we keep asking the same question of a player 3 seasons in a row, the truth is he's never given a definitive answer thus needs to be replaced.
We also need someone to run the academy, for me the answer is staring us right in the face, combine the two roles and give it to wenger.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
I think of the conversations coming and I know I need to like myself more so that the answer I can give her is a resonding «yes».
the fact that so many accusations were submitted and not too many answers were given says quite a bit... Don't even need 140 characters to read that.
The answer is a solid «no»; you do not need to give your breasts time to fill between feeds.
If you find you are looking for ideas to help give baby that extra bit she needs to sleep through the night, cluster feeding just might be your answer!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z