For more than a decade,
giving as a percentage of income to all mainline churches, Protestant as well as Catholic, has declined.
Not exact matches
Therefore, bonds and cash
as a
percentage of TOTAL NET WORTH is likely even smaller
given equity and fixed
income investments aren't usually 100 %
of one's net worth.
On the basis
of these figures, when population and taxes are taken into consideration,
giving to religion
as a
percentage of income declined over these years from 1.29 percent to 0.84 percent — a decline
of 35 percent from the 1968 base.
With stunning consistency, virtually every indicator
of civic engagement currently available shows the same pattern
of increase followed by stagnation and decline — newspaper reading; TV news watching; attending political meetings; petition signing; running for public office; attending public meetings; serving
as an officer or committee member in any local clubs or organizations; writing letters to the editor; participating in local meetings
of national organizations; attending religious services; socializing informally with friends, relatives or neighbors; attending club meetings; joining unions; entertaining friends at home; participating in picnics; eating the evening meal with the whole family; going out to bars, nightclubs, discos or taverns; playing cards; sending greeting cards; attending parties; playing sports; donating money
as a
percentage of income; working on community projects;
giving blood.
Those Fundamentals require the acceptance
of the Consequences, also known
as the required Worship: repeating the Word
of Witness, observing the five daily prayers,
giving a fixed
percentage of income to the poor, fasting during the month
of Ramadan, and making the pilgrimage to Mecca if possible.
If you have a single jurisdiction that can control the entire corporate tax system, one
of the easiest and most common ways to integrate corporate and individual level
income taxes is to impose taxes on corporate profits at the corporate level, but then to
give recipients
of dividends who are subject to domestic
income taxes a credit equal to the
percentage of income paid by the dividend paying corporation, treating the corporate
income tax
as a withholding tax that becomes final when dividends are distributed to foreign taxpayers who don't pay domestic
income taxes.
In recent decades, religious
giving as a
percentage of personal
income has decreased from about 1.2 percent
of personal
income in 1963 to less than 0.9 percent
of personal
income in 2003.
This makes the new goal set by the major charter school networks, to grade themselves on the
percentage of their students who go on to earn four - year college degrees in six years, all the more radical — especially
given the fact that these networks educate low -
income, minority students, whose college graduation rates pale in comparison to their more affluent white peers — a mere 9 percent earning degrees within six years, compared with 77 percent
of students from high -
income families
as of 2015.
Given that the
percentage of low -
income suburban fourth - grade young men struggling with literacy is only seven
percentage points lower than that for big - city counterparts (and only six points lower for suburban fourth - grade young women peers than for big - city counterparts), suburban districts are doing
as poorly
as big - city counterparts in providing the poorest kids with high - quality education needed for success in an increasingly knowledge - based economy.
GDS indicates the highest
percentage of gross
income given as payment for house maintenance costs.
I would highly recommend that your charitable
giving be defined
as a
percentage of your
income.
Most judges who want to can teach a course or a seminar at a law school and receive another $ 25,000 in pay (the ceiling on outside
income, apart from investment
income and royalties, and a very low ceiling
given current law school salaries — which benefits judges, since they can teach less to reach their ceiling,
as it is an ever - diminishing
percentage of a professor's salary).
Why would a Realtor who is already (by dint
of his / her own efforts) making a good living «without»
giving away a significant
percentage of his / her
income on a deal - a-month-or-more standard then decide to start
giving away significant money in an effort to gain more business for «less»
income per transaction... (has anyone heard
of the negative economic principle known
as «the principle
of diminishing returns»?)