Sentences with phrase «giving bigger consequences»

In this discussion, «losing your temper» is generally defined as: yelling at kids, calling them names, slamming things on the counter, giving bigger consequences than are needed, and refusing to meet basic needs, such as by saying, «No supper tonight.»

As you progress through the narrative, it seems that there will be a series of choices available that will give big consequences to the storyline.

Not exact matches

His consequence for destroying us and others was that he was given a brand new position in a bigger church in no time.

There's a big difference between giving kids consequences and punishments.

I guess Trump will lose a huge political advantage (because you can't say that something is fake with this kind of law in place), but wouldn't it give him a bigger advantage since every fake story will have too big consequences to run it before fact checking it?

It's theoretically possible that some internal cycle in the ocean circulation could give Holocene temperature fluctuations as big as the LIA, but until one identifies such a mechanism, it's essentially impossible to say what the consequences would be for climate sensitivity.

And while their mood may be dour and their outlook grim, perhaps the single biggest silver lining in their cloud of dread may be that such men — men who understand that actions have consequences — exist and are given this great responsibility.

A big aspect of the film relies too much on a random coincidence which is always a pet peeve of mine, leading to a subplot that could have been removed without any narrative consequence, but at the same time it's this part of The Drop that gives it a tender heart which allows for a deeper emotional meaning.

It's theoretically possible that some internal cycle in the ocean circulation could give Holocene temperature fluctuations as big as the LIA, but until one identifies such a mechanism, it's essentially impossible to say what the consequences would be for climate sensitivity.

They have a safe harbor from discipline by the most vigilant protectors of the practice monopoly under Rule 5.5, and criminal consequences are unlikely as a practical matter given how big an employer and how politically connected they are.

The exchange could give priority to bigger investors or screw up the order book without any consequence.