Sentences with phrase «giving common people»

And, in any case, there's something to be said, I think, for giving common people their own institutional branch through which they might assert their interests against other institutions more readily at the disposal of wealthy elites.

Apropos Father Maciej Zieba's «The Liberalism that We Need» (February): Liberalism and the Industrial Revolution gave the common people the franchise, which enabled them to gain the freedom that we possess in praxis today - political, economic, and ideological.

Contingency fees give common people access to quality representation, justice and compensation.

Not exact matches

Some common conditions of bail include living at a particular address, not contacting certain people, giving in your passport so you can't leave the country, and reporting to a police station once a week.

«And we're all flying through space together, as a team, and it gives you this perspective — people have described it as this «orbital perspective» — on humanity, and you get this feeling that we just need to work better — much, much better — to solve our common problems.»

Given the worrying headlines that consistently swirl around the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, common sense suggests that you'd be hard pressed to find a vacationer willing to take a trip there.

Another common tendency in workplace design is the impulse to shove as many people into an open office as possible, given all the open space that a lack of cubicles creates.

A common mistake people make is asking before giving.

Giving us your proxy means that you authorize another person or persons to vote your shares of common stock at the annual meeting in the manner

Maybe, just maybe it would be ok if someone was working on a technical problem such as a car, computer or something that was not directed at you (the person himself) maybe, no not even then... Certainly not a customer who you want to come back and see you... Why even taking the chance to insult a person... I'm on a mission to kindly tell people not to say «no problem» because it may reflect on there tip... So I give them choice & hopefully a good tip... Really folks, its just good common sense.

This handy reference covers how to give feedback, accept criticism, deal with difficult people, and many other common professional challenges.

Free mobile games are so common that it costs many companies money to get people to play a game they are giving away for free.

Or maybe Facebook should just give a common sense quiz that people have to pass if they want an account.

As long as PS Fund (along with any of its Related Persons) does not otherwise engage in (or has not otherwise engaged in) conduct that would otherwise result in its becoming an Acquiring Person by becoming the Beneficial Owner of 10 % or more of the shares of Common Stock then outstanding, PS Fund's solicitation and receipt of one or more revocable proxies from the Company's stockholders to be counted toward the number of shares of the outstanding Common Stock needed to cause a special meeting of stockholders to be called pursuant to and in accordance with the Bylaws, which proxies are given to PS Fund in response to a public solicitation of proxies made pursuant to, and in accordance with, Section 14 (a) of the Exchnage Act by means of a solicitation statement filed with the Commission on Schedule 15A, should not, of itself, cause PS Fund to become an Acquiring Person.

Given that many people live paycheque - to - paycheque, are wilfully ignorant about managing their money, shun shares, and save little towards their retirement, this drive to achieve financial freedom through the stock market is far less common than it might seem to the typical Monevator reader.

«Common values,» I found in my interviews, is a phrase that stands in for one of two things: treating other people with respect or giving back to the community.

But believe anything that can give u with full eveidence ex: science with evidences All religious books are just a «bully» only to common people to believe for not doing any bad things & live as a human only (not as animals).

«Give generosity to those who seek to form opinion and discernment to those who vote, that our nation may prosper and that, with all the peoples of Europe, we may work for peace and the common good.

Community of the kind Christ desires can only occur with another when He is shared as more necessary than breath amidst all persons present, whether they be the person «giving» or the one receiving — Christ must not be fore - fitted to some other monstrous conceit that is paraded as «communion» and «fellowship» — the common bane of our religious activity.

Maybe he was buying a lot of guns (perfectly legal in Texas) and making them more automatic (perfectly common in Texas), but the government gave him and his people every reason to believe that they were under attack.

In an age in which divorce is common and many people end up practicing «serial monogamy»» and in an age in which gays have been given rights to marriage it appears strange for people to have qualms about polygamy.

In this context God comes to man as a call to give up his dreams of personal salvation and join the people in their struggle for a common salvation.

«In my view it is vital that people are given the opportunity to hear the magical language of The Book of Common Prayer in church.

Given this interest in spiritual practices and things monastic, it is not surprising that more and more people are practicing the daily office (also called «divine office,» «office,» «liturgy of the hours» or «common prayer»).

«Therefore the Church gives thanks for each and every woman: for mothers, for sisters, for wives; for women consecrated to God in virginity; for women dedicated to the many human beings who await the gratuitous love of another person; for women who watch over the human persons in the family, which is the fundamental sign of the human community; for women who work professionally, and who at times are burdened by a great social responsibility; for «perfect» women and for «weak» women - for all women as they have come forth from the heart of God in all the beauty and richness of their femininity; as they have been embraced by his eternal love; as, together with men, they are pilgrims on this earth, which is the temporal «homeland» of all people and is transformed sometimesinto a «valley of tears»; as they assume, together with men, a common responsibility for the destiny of humanity according to daily necessities and according to that definitive destiny which the human family has in God himself, in the bosom of the ineffable Trinity.»

Particular persons may be given responsibility for doing theology within the common life of Christian congregations, or for seeing to it that it is done.

It is a history, and it has functioned — as history tends to function — as a binding agent, melding disparate individuals together into a single people by giving them a common past.

Yahweh in hebrew means my Lord and is a common reference meaning supreme God.In the bible satan is referred specifically as the adversary in hebrew or slanderer in greek its quite clear there is no confusion.Satan is not in the same league as God he is sovereign in fact God has satan on a leash and limits his control particularly over his people as we read in Job.Christians need to realise that satan can influence us if we walk according to the flesh.In the case of David calling a cencus meant he gave in to his pride he wanted to know how many soldiers he had believing numbers would give him the upper hand and so Satan took advantage of his weakness and Davids choice displeased God.David of all people should have known as he as a young man had defeated goliath a mighty warrior and it was because of his faith and trust in God that he overcame.But it wasnt God that made David make that decision it was his own and satan tempted him and he gave in to that desire In the two verses there is no confusion if you understand how God and satan operate i did at one stage have the same issue with Jesus sending the demons into the pigs why would he help satan or at least it appeared that way?

Modernity's emphasis on secularism involves three elements - a) the desacralisation of nature which produced a nature devoid of spirits preparing the way for its scientific analysis and technological control and use; b) desacralisation of society and state by liberating them from the control of established authority and laws of religion which often gave spiritual sanction to social inequality and stifled freedom of reason and conscience of persons; it was necessary to affirm freedom and equality as fundamental rights of all persons and to enable common action in politics and society by adherents of all religions and none in a religiously pluralistic society; and c) an abandonment of an eternally fixed sacred order of human society enabling ordering of secular social affairs on the basis of rational discussion.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Most Revd Justin Welby has described the work of foreign correspondents and war reporters as a «God - given calling to inspire others to serve our common humanity», which helped motivate people to care about what was going on elsewhere in the world.

@Chad «ok, so you have given up on maintaining that Babylonians Romans, Persians, Ottomans ever had any «common practice of destroying the gods, and killing the religious followers of the conquered indigenous people (don't forget, Christianity arose as a sect of Judaism, in an occupied Roman territory (Judea).

They are ingrained in the normal structures of society, an ongoing and necessary process in every society that gives the people in it something they want and need very badly: stability, cohesion, and common purpose.

Among other topics, Volf discusses faith in the public square, and asks what kind of religious conviction will be able to give meaning to human lives and help people seek the common good.

To try to draw any sort of picture of this person without these common traits and ideas would give us so minimalist a portrait as to be useless at best and misleading at worst.

The Catholic church is as Jesus gave in an illustration of «Lazarus and the Rich man», whereby Lazarus pictured the common people or am - haarets (Hebrew meaning «people of the land») and the rich man pictured the Jewish religious leaders who fed the Lazarus class spiritual «crumbs».

It is a very different account of burial from what might have been given if a group of anonymous Jews had been concerned simply to throw the body of Jesus (and perhaps those of the two thieves also) into the grave or tomb of the common people in order to prevent the precincts of the holy city from being defiled.

@What the Jews don't get: what anti-Semites don't get is that it's irrational to dislike an entire set of people based on a common label given to those people.

But seriously... give a million people with common sense a bible and you have a million theologies.

This type of confusion is common among people who have erroneous ideas about the origin of the earth and so never bothered to study linguistics... if god gave us ready made language, why bother?

Given the pervasiveness of this moral theory and its impact upon the common person, it is no accident that our own century is replete with political movements that require or threaten the destruction of known values in order to create a future of unlimited happiness.

When we give to assist others, we are expressing that solidarity with all people which comes from recognising our common dignity as human persons made to the image and likeness of God.

If so, Christians and other religious people should view the situation realistically and give up on the cultural illusion that serious religion will just fit in with the common culture.

A person may be irresponsible, of course, in the sense that he lacks the true qualifications of a self, but if he has freedom or the ability to answer he may be morally irresponsible in the sense that he refuses to give account to those to whom he owes an answer for common goods, or in the sense that he offers a false account for the things entrusted to him.

Believing passionately in the importance of a particular issue — there were a great many of them — ardent partisans would brook no suggestion that they might have to give a bit to make common cause with people who were not quite «pure» on the issues vital to them.

My dictionary gives as the first meaning: «a people, usually the inhabitants of a specific territory, who share common customs, origins, history, and frequently language or related languages.»

Given the broad appeal of the Franciscans among the common people and the consequent threat that it represented to the well - heeled clerical hierarchy, it is no wonder that Pope John XXII (1249 - 1334) condemned and hunted down the most zealous Franciscans, the so - called Fraticelli.

And over time, I've actually developed some new relationships here in Dayton with people who are likeminded... (or who are different enough that being different gives us something in common).

The pastor and others who feel sermons are important don't trust the Holy Spirit to work or speak through the «common» people so they don't want to give them the opportunity to speak or share.

One should also appreciate the fact that though an institution founded by Christian Missions, considering the inter-religious character of the academic community of the college, the founders emphasized the Christian «values» of self - giving service to the poor and concern for the whole person rather than Christian salvation, thereby somewhat separating the common «culture» and values of humanism of academic community of the college, from the Christian «religion» and thus relatively secularizing it to keep the academic community free from discrimination on the basis of religion.

As among the conglomerate people of the United States there is a common identification and a common sense of participation in the formative events of national history, so also the people of all of Israel's varied tribal backgrounds made the common confession of faith: «We were Pharaoh's slaves in Egypt; and the LORD brought us out of Egypt with a mighty hand... and he brought us out from there, that he might bring us in and give us the land which he swore to give to our fathers» (Deut.