Sentences with phrase «giving false value»

Discrimination in itself is never objectionable; giving false value to a distinction is.

A «forensic accountant» can also check whether the value of assets are true, if you think your partner has given false values.

Not exact matches

Oden also has a curious habit of including excerpts whose only distinction is that they contain somewhat involved metaphors — a journey from Peking to Canton, one thief accusing another to the police, a merchant momentarily given false hope as he watches his ship founder at sea, an emperor choosing a day - laborer as his son - in - law, the difference in value between a pound of gold and a pound of feathers, a corpse still able to perform some of the functions of a living body — as if such metaphors were intrinsically humorous.

The age old problem of SELF often is manifest in a false identity such as; «we are children of Abraham» (therefore I am righteous), «I go to... «church»» (somehow this «church» makes you something) or «all you say we will do» (the people of Israel saying they in themself can meet God's standard), «I give to the church» (not personally meeting others needs), «I do this program or that program» (though you do not desire to glorify God but rather there is some intrinsic value in doing a program).

I've seen a couple studies showing that blood donation can significantly reduce your A1C (giving false low values), but will that be a temporary reduction even if you are 100 % complaint on a low fat plant based diet?

This indicator calculates backwards what is needed close value for current, next bar (Calculate on bar close: false) to give indicator value to predefined value.

Putting a value as high as $ 1.84 on VXGN shares will give current shareholders false expectations of what they could expect to get paid by a new management.

Banks are paying out record dividends as a percentage of earnings (for Westpac it is over 80 %) Given your previous statements which I 100 % agree with around the false economics of dividend stocks and given Australian banks are exposed to Aussie mortgages to a far greater state than US banks were exposed to US mortgages I struggle to see how Australian banks represent vGiven your previous statements which I 100 % agree with around the false economics of dividend stocks and given Australian banks are exposed to Aussie mortgages to a far greater state than US banks were exposed to US mortgages I struggle to see how Australian banks represent vgiven Australian banks are exposed to Aussie mortgages to a far greater state than US banks were exposed to US mortgages I struggle to see how Australian banks represent value.

What I described was a standard definition, which distinguishes between the probability that 95 % of samples will include the true value within their CIs (claimed to be true), and a 95 % probability that the true value lies within the CI of a given sample (claimed to be false).

The criterion of falsity falls short of this certainty, given that false statements can sometimes have value and given the difficulty of conclusively determining total falsity.

First, in paragraph 29, I think that the CJEU fails to give proper value to the expression «false» impression.