Sentences with phrase «giving global warming deniers»

Not exact matches

For those who seek to curtail travel in a feeble attempt to fight global warming: Given the non-emergency that climate change has thus far proven to be and the real and dire crises that presently plague the planet, should we also deny transportation (by aid organizations and concerned citizens) to regions, like the Darfur or Sierra Leone, that require our immediate attention?

I felt that he is global warming skeptic or denier to read his article but it was not related with global warming issue and I felt his article is difficult to understand because English is my foreign languge, I give up others of him.

I don't understand how those who deny global warming can maintain their position given the stakes.

Since this blog has given considerable space to the discussions of the global warming deniers (who have no real basis in serious academic literature), it would only seem fair to review this book by Speth in the NY Times, and then have a discussion of it on this blog.

Independent group BBC Trust tells network giving man - made global warming deniers too much press creates «false balance»

«given the impression that we are global - warming deniers of the worst sort, and that our analysis of the issue is ideological and unscientific.

In 2009, Monckton gave a speech at Bethel University in Minnesota denying global warming.

That is the problem is that the real thing that «deniers» are saying is that the conclusion of «we are all going to die» (which is a most probable true statement, we all will eventually die just not due to Global Warming) that is the political narrative on this «science» barring we give up our rights to energy production to a global authority is a hard pill to swallow unless you have real evidence rather than modeled science to go oGlobal Warming) that is the political narrative on this «science» barring we give up our rights to energy production to a global authority is a hard pill to swallow unless you have real evidence rather than modeled science to go oglobal authority is a hard pill to swallow unless you have real evidence rather than modeled science to go off of.

However, readers of my column will know that I give contrarians, or sceptics, or deniers (call them what you will) short shrift, and as a close follower of the scientific debate on this subject I can state without doubt that there is no dispute whatsoever within the expert community as to the reality or causes of manmade global warming.

The Wyoming governor, Republican Matt Mead, is an outspoken supporter of fossil fuels (not surprising, given that Wyoming is the No. 1 coal producing state in the union) and is also on record as denying global warming.

That paradox has puzzled scientists for years and given climate - change deniers fodder to dispute global warming.

Interestingly, USA Today gives famed denier Pat Michaels a chance to respond, but he makes a bizarrely lame argument, which, for anyone who understands the subject (or has read my book), should make one more worried about catastrophic global warming, not less:

If you're wondering why Congress has yet to tackle this global crisis despite overwhelming scientific consensus and ballooning costs of inaction, Think Progress has an interactive map that shows the huge sums of political donations given by the oil and gas industry alongside which members of Congress deny the realities of global warming.

In any case, it is simply an effort to reconcile the rapid rates of warming in the Arctic with the output of the most recent group of global climate models — everyone agrees that global warming is real, except for a very large number of editors and reporters with the U.S. press, who continue to advocate for the positions held by a small number of fossil fuel funded contrarians and insist on giving them «equal time» — a luxury denied to renewable energy experts.

Why would the Trump administration enthusiastically embrace, promote, and back geoengineering / climate intervention programs given the fact that Donald Trump and most of his appointees patently deny that there is any global warming in the first place?