Sentences with phrase «giving valid arguments»

U guy giving valid arguments about other ps devices but that has nothing to do with his statement.

Not exact matches

«Lewis wrote in a time when, among the educated British public if not among their professional philosophers, there was considerably more agreement than there is now about what constitutes a valid and rational argument for a given case.»
Given he achieved that in less than half the amount of time Wenger has been in charge, it is a valid argument to say that Graham was more successful in terms of both winning the domestic league, and in European football.
Defencivly Coq has performed better than Schneiderlin, more tackles per 90 mins and less fouls given, more headers and winning a higher %... so yeah, we could have a valid argument that Coq is the better holding CM so far this season then the # 25 + million man Schniderlin
To slightly expand (and this could be a valid argument for the EU - comission as well), Germany is closer to Russia than some other member states, it has a history of being a reliable partner that purchases large volumes of gas (largest customer in EU IIRC), therefore it's given the best deal.
In other words, if climate sensitivity is toward the low end, 2 K is more dangerous than we currently give it credit for, and arguments for low risk because of low sensitivity are less valid because that means that more ecological changes occur for a given temperature change than currently thought.
I don't consider that a valid argument in regards to a scientific paper which gives you the percentages they used to define the diet.
In these lessons students work in pairs or groups to evaluate the evidence and arguments given and reach a valid judgement.
While there are valid arguments at this time as to whether one should rent or own their primary residence given the absurd amount of debt most are carrying on their principal residence along with artificially cheap money and the boomer influx about to hit the real estate markets across Canada over the next few years it would seem you are okay in that area.
In other words, if climate sensitivity is toward the low end, 2 K is more dangerous than we currently give it credit for, and arguments for low risk because of low sensitivity are less valid because that means that more ecological changes occur for a given temperature change than currently thought.
Sorry, but that is not a valid argument, because you have not given any (scientific) reason for your statement.
When I do it, my argument in response to too - short trendlines sometimes is to supply alternative trendlines for exactly the same period that show the opposite sign, as proof by counterexample to indicate the specific trendline suggested is invalid; sometimes to supply long - enough trendlines when such are available, to illustrate a more correct method; sometimes to apply a methodologically valid use of short trendlines within a framework of a longer timespan and suggest the appropriate Bayesian treatment to predict the very low likelihood of the true trend being actually cooling given the too short trendline.
They may have valid data and arguments but it's impossible to even give them the benefit of the doubt.
There is hardly ever «certainty» in scientific work, but that is not a valid reason to give uncertainty undue weight by overemphasizing doubt, misinterpreting peoples comments and creating strawman arguments.
Given that Plimer doesn't seem to know what a valid or a sound argument is, or what facts are, and too many of the typical audience don't seem to know either, you can only expect to win these types of encounters by being quick on your feet and cleverer in finding ways to humiliate him.
The double - dipping argument was rejected as it was the income earning capacity of the payor that gave rise to the assets in the company and this argument was not valid.
However, apparently some poeple at least in the US have managed to persuade employers and others to give them married benefits based on their Canadian marriage, so it is helpful to them if there is some argument that the marriage is valid here.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z