I am concerned with how changes in climate affect
glacial mass balance and the physical and chemical properties of snow.
Greenland's conventional earthquakes aren't showing any trend despite the loss of
glacial mass balance.
The current picture of Holocene climate variations is based not just on tree ring data, but on
glacial mass balance and a wide variety of other proxy data.
Evidence from glacial advance / retreat (e.g. the evidence from tropical Andean glaciers you cite above) is often difficult to interpret, because
glacial mass balance represents in general a subtle competition between the influences of ablation (determined by changes in temperature thresholds reached) and accumulation (determined by changes in humidity and precipitation).
Not exact matches
Complementary analyses of the surface
mass balance of Greenland (Tedesco et al, 2011) also show that 2010 was a record year for melt area extent... Extrapolating these melt rates forward to 2050, «the cumulative loss could raise sea level by 15 cm by 2050 ″ for a total of 32 cm (adding in 8 cm from
glacial ice caps and 9 cm from thermal expansion)- a number very close to the best estimate of Vermeer & Rahmstorf (2009), derived by linking the observed rate of sea level rise to the observed warming.
Reconstructed
mass balance yielded accumulation and ablation each of ~ 3 km3 / yr, with
glacial movement near the equilibrium line altitude dominated by basal sliding.Pollen and charcoal records from three lakes in northern Yellowstone provide information on the postglacial vegetation and fire history.
A fuller list of recent publications on
glacial movements and
mass balance is available at http://www.wgms.ch/literature.html