Not exact matches
The
glaciers around Puncak Jaya lost nearly 80 percent of their
area between 1936 and 2006 two - thirds of that
loss has come since 1970.
This number may seem small, but from 2005 to 2010, Alaskan
glacier losses made up one third of the world's ice sheet
losses, despite having 20 times fewer ice - covered
areas than Greenland.
The
loss of significant portions of the ice shelf that retarded the seaward movement seems to be absent in certain
areas and that might presage a more rapid deterioration of the
glaciers there.
However, the idea is simple, and I've talked about this much in many presentations this winter: Take the amount of ice you need to get rid of from Greenland to raise sea level 2 m in the next century, reduce it by your best estimate of the amount that would be removed by surface mass balance
losses, and try to push the rest out of the aggregate cross-sectional
area of Greenland's marine - based outlet
glaciers.
That equation says that there is only ONE forest system in the North American continent that might be species - stable — the 4 - park Banff /
Glacier National
area — but that is suffering from serious
glacier system
loss from climate.
They found that while two of the largest
glaciers in that
area — Kangerdlugssuaq and Helheim — contribute more to the total ice
loss than any other single
glaciers, the 30 or so smaller
glaciers there contributed 72 percent of the total ice lost.
One of the current consequences of the
loss of
glaciers in the Chicago
area is the heat during the summer.
SLR by 2100 is more likely to come from ice mass
loss from West Antarctica (WAIS) where warm ocean currents are already melting ice at
glacier mouths and attacking
areas of the WAIS resting on the seabed.
The northern melting will likely add to sea level rise explains lead author, Shfaqat Abbas Khan: «If this activity in northwest Greenland continues and really accelerates some of the major
glaciers in the
area — like the Humboldt Glacier and the Peterman Glacier — Greenland's total ice
loss could easily be increased by an additional 50 to 100 cubic kilometers (12 to 24 cubic miles) within a few years.»
In 2009, using ICESat, measurements of both Greenland and Antarctica found that dynamic thinning (ice
loss resulting from accelerated
glacier flow) now reached all latitudes in Greenland, and had intensified at key
areas of Antarctica's grounding line.
This retreat represents a
loss in
glacier area that will be mapped in 2001 and 2002.
Equilibrium line - The boundary between the region on a
glacier where there is a net annual
loss of ice mass (ablation
area) and that where there is a net annual gain (accumulation
area).
Mountainous
areas will face
glacier retreat, reduced snow cover and winter tourism, and extensive species
losses (in some
areas up to 60 % under high emission scenarios by 2080).
Because of expected increases in the
loss of land - based
glaciers in Greenland, Antarctica and other
areas, Joughin says the end - of - century figure may be closer to three feet.
And with a new picture of which
glaciers contribute most to mass
loss, IceBridge will be able to more effectively target
areas in future campaigns, promising more and better data to add to the research community's body of knowledge.
Box and Decker (2011) note the
loss of
area of the largest
glaciers in the last decade 1590 square km.
They find that all of the
glaciers receded over the 1952 - 2005 period with an average
loss in surface
area of about 0.19 % per year.
In
Glacier National Park, North Cascades, Helm
Glacier and Place
Glacier frequent
loss of the entire snowcover by the end of the ablation season has become commonplace (WGMS, 2005 The result is in net ablation throughout the accumulation
area causing thinning of the
glacier in the accumulation zone.
The pollution of its inland rivers and waters; depleting fresh water sources through melting of Himalayan
glaciers and depleting groundwater; land degradation estimated at 20 % of land
area, and damage to coastal and marine ecosystems with
loss of 34 % of mangroves between 1950 and 2000, are other India's challenges.
In the period 1992 to 2005, the
glacier suffered a
loss of 90 % of its surface
area, and 97 % of its volume of ice (Berger et al., 2005).
Overall in Greenland, the rate of
area loss in marine - terminating
glaciers during the 2010 melt season (419 km2) was 3.4 times that of the previous 8 years.
In 2002, the Larsen B ice shelf collapsed; in 2003, the World Glacial Monitoring Service reported that «The recent increase in the rates of ice
loss over reduced
glacier surface
areas as compared with earlier
losses related to larger surface
areas (cf. the thorough revision of available data by Dyurgerov, 2002) becomes even more pronounced and leaves no doubt about the accelerating change in climatic conditions.»
Record droughts in many
areas of the world, the
loss of arctic sea ice — what you see is an increasing trend that is superimposed on annual variablity (no bets on what happens next year, but the five - to - ten year average in global temperatures, sea surface temperatures, ocean heat content — those will increase — and ice sheet volumes, tropical
glacier volumes, sea ice extent will decrease.