Not exact matches
Scientists have long suspected Greenland's melting may be accelerated by the ocean (SN Online: 7/6/11), but needed
data on fjord depth and
glacier thickness to prove it.
Millan, a UCI graduate student researcher in Earth system science, and his colleagues analyzed 20 major outlet
glaciers in southeast Greenland using high - resolution airborne gravity measurements and ice
thickness data from NASA's Operation IceBridge mission; bathymetry information from NASA's Oceans Melting Greenland project; and results from the BedMachine version 3 computer model, developed at UCI.
If everything goes according to plan, the radar will be turned on and will start to collect
data on the
thickness of
glaciers and ice sheets just three days post-launch.
Analysis of the
data showed that despite isolated cases where ice volume and
thickness increased, none of the advancing
glaciers have come close to the maximums achieved during the so - called «Little Ice Age» — a period of cooling between the sixteenth and the nineteenth century.
Less is known about southwest Greenland
glaciers due to a lack of ice
thickness data but the
glaciers have accelerated there as well and are likely to be strongly out of balance despite thickening of the interior.
«IceBridge has collected so much
data on elevation and
thickness that we can now do analysis down to the individual
glacier level and do it for the entire ice sheet,» said Michael Studinger, IceBridge project scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. «We can now quantify contributions from the different processes that contribute to ice loss.»
That is the discovery made by scientists using
data from CryoSat - 2, the European probe that has been measuring the
thickness of Earth's ice sheets and
glaciers since it was launched by [continue reading...]
Global mass balance
data are transformed to sea - level equivalent by first multiplying the ice
thickness (meters) lost to melting by the density of ice (about 900 kilograms per cubic meter), to obtain a water equivalent
thickness, and then multiplying by the surface area of these «small»
glaciers (about 760,000 square kilometers).