The findings sharpen the way
glaciologists think about melting of ice sheets and how ice reflects light, according to Marek Stibal, a cryosphere ecologist at Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic and one of the lead authors of the new study.
But not
all glaciologists think it has significantly changed the planet's immediate prognosis.
Not exact matches
The public may balk at geoengineering, but we've got to
think boldly if we're going to protect our coasts, says
glaciologist Slawek Tulaczyk
Richard Alley, a
glaciologist at Pennsylvania State University, said it is an «interesting paper» that shows that thinning has started in a region
thought resistant, in response to warming that is much smaller than what is projected for the future.
Studies by
glaciologist Eric Rignot of the University of California, Irvine and others suggest that ice sheets could melt faster than scientists initially
thought.
«We
think it's a nice case study for this kind of political tension stemming from climate change,» study author William Colgan, a
glaciologist at York University in Toronto, said.
Sorry, I probably missed the boat on this one (you caught me on vacation) but I
think you and the
glaciologist make a good point.
I've put out a query to a batch of
glaciologists for more
thoughts and will update this post when they reply.
As summer neared an end in 2007, reports from Greenland indicated that the flow of glaciers into the sea had accelerated beyond anything
glaciologists had
thought possible.
Dr. Theodore A. Scambos, a
glaciologist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center at the University of Colorado, said the long life of Larsen B «makes you
think there's something particularly unusual about this warming» — perhaps evidence that the warming has been brought on by artificial emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that trap heat in the atmosphere.
A region of the Greenland ice sheet that had been
thought to be stable is undergoing what
glaciologists call «dynamic thinning».
«I
think this event is the calving equivalent of an «aftershock» following the much bigger event,» Ian Howat a
glaciologist at Ohio State University told NASA.
All I can
think is that either somebody has their decimal point off by a couple of places, or
glaciologists can't agree on the definition of «glacier», or the USGS can no longer afford to hire
glaciologists.
«I don't
think this lets us off the hook of explaining how Antarctica's sea ice is expanding in a warming world,» says Ted Scambos, a
glaciologist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado.
It's challenging, but it also means that when you say «For this guy I was
thinking about the
glaciologist's dream in Herzog's Encounters at the End of the World», nobody's eyes immediately go blank.