Sentences with phrase «glance at the arguments»

Why don't we take a cursory glance at the arguments being made, and see if we can't get to the bottom of this.

Not exact matches

It sounds like a rational enough argument at first glance, but it's also one that you can begin to test empirically.

In discussing the classical attributes in the second group, I shall cast a cursory glance at Hartshorne's other arguments against those attributes and suggest that they lack cogency.

At first glance, research suggests that the ERS is correct in their argument: central party control over candidate selection and position on party lists tends to increase party unity in legislative behaviour.

Corbyn successfully attracted people into the Labour party for his election, and there were more people who didn't vote at all than Conservative voters in 2015, so at a glance this seems like a powerful argument.

At first glance, intelligent design looks like the same argument that evolution's foes have made since 1859, when Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species: Only a divine intelligence could have created something as complex as life on Earth.

At first glance, this seems like a serious concern, especially given that some details of Hawking's original argument may be incorrect — specifically the claim that information is destroyed in black holes.

Having briefly glanced at it, his main argument seems to come from overlaying the CO2 records at the same stage of different glacial cycles, and that seems quite hard to do, to me — William]

At first glance, this argument has a persuasiveness.

A quick glance at the CX - 7's specifications reveals some telling traits that support the Hiroshima - based carmaker's arguments.

At first glance, your subtitles might not be obvious that these allow various arguments in your body.

Having briefly glanced at it, his main argument seems to come from overlaying the CO2 records at the same stage of different glacial cycles, and that seems quite hard to do, to me — William]

The choice of region Poon for CO2 measurement, seems at first glance quite sensible: — Near equator (NH has higher CO2 than SH — the same argument that makes Mauna Loa a good choice)-- Appear to be average vegetation.

At first glance the letter seemed ordinary — reciting misguided climate - science denial arguments for not acting to reduce greenhouse - gas emissions.

Because most citizens and policy - makers have not been trained in spotting ethically dubious claims that are often hidden in what appear at first glance to be «value - neutral» economic arguments, IPCC's acknowledgement of the ethical limitations of economic arguments is vitally important.

I'm not sure I get the «crisis of confidence» argument, but in the meantime, your anticipation that environmentalism will begin to refocus on overpopulation, prompted me to glance at The Ecologist.

But we should not pause for long: Neither argument is as compelling as it appears at first glance.

What appears at first glance to be an overwhelmingly numerical argument for a certain course of action (i.e. 250,000 dead children), when seen in its proper context, turns out to be an outright lie.

I'm not saying I agree with Mirko (generally I don't)-- I'm just saying there are reasonable arguments against caring too much about the next generation, even if at first glance it appears unreasonable.