At the G - 7 summit over the weekend, President Trump
refused on Saturday to recommit to the Paris agreement, while the six other leading industrialized nations reiterated their support for the accord, which sets out a
global action plan to avoid dangerous
climate change by limiting
global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius.
If a nation emitting high levels of ghgs
refuses to reduce its emissions to its fair share of safe
global emissions
on the basis that there is too much scientific uncertainty to warrant
action, if it turns out that human - induced
climate change actually greatly harms the health and ecological systems
on which life depends for tens of millions of others, should that nation be responsible for the harms that could have been avoided if preventative
action had been taken earlier?