Sentences with phrase «global arbitration cases»

High technology expert witnesses with an increasing portfolio of high - profile litigation and global arbitration cases to our name.

Not exact matches

Hong Kong is also proud of its judicial independence (it is the leading Asian jurisdiction in this regard, according to the World Economic Forum's Global Competitiveness Report 2017 - 2018), although Mr Justice Fok, Permanent Judge of the Hong Kong Court of Final Court of Appeal, felt driven to provide a strong assertion and defence of the judiciary's independence during the UNCITRAL Asia - Pacific Judicial Summit, following allegations by some commentators that the judiciary had compromised its independence in respect of certain well - publicised cases (not connected with arbitration).

As the costs and risks of international arbitration grow, our hugely experienced team can provide you with the right financial solution to support any type of case and across many global jurisdictions.

Such increases in commercial arbitration stand comparison with those in investment arbitration; as the 2017 edition of Global Legal Insight's Guide to International Arbitration makes clear: «Egypt has been involved in a large number of investment arbitrations, with a total of 29 cases against Egypt registered with the ICSID Centre, including 17 cases registered since 2011.»

Litigation and arbitration cases are increasingly becoming global in nature, and data may come from a variety of countries.

Notable cases include Metall Market OOO v Vitorio Shipping, The «Lehmann Timber» (Court of Appeal); Global Process Systems v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia, The «Cendor MOPU» (Supreme Court); Commercial Court actions and arbitrations relating to the petrochemical industry, including offshore construction and the litigation arising from the Buncefield tank farm explosion; shipbuilding, ship finance and ship sale disputes; shipping and commodities cases, raising a diverse range of issues relating to contracts of sale, bills of lading and Charterparties and Arbitration Act 1996 applications.

In a new study published today by Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), in partnership with global law firm White & Case, 90 % of the respondents surveyed prefer international arbitration to resolve cross-border disputes, a finding which has increased significantly from QMUL's first international arbitration survey in 2006, where the figure was 73 %.

«It is unique in the global arbitration community to offer first - class case administration in multiple jurisdictions.

White & Case since has grown to a 150 - person arbitration practice and currently oversees 223 arbitration matters valued at $ 73 billion, according to Global Arbitration Review, a law journal.

«At a global level, White & Case is well - known for its international arbitration practice.

As global trade and investment increases, the volume of international arbitration cases also rises.

Global law firm White & Case LLP has advised Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO), a Finnish electricity producer, on the negotiation of a global settlement agreement which ends its arbitration against French nuclear group Areva and German technology group Siemens in relation to the Olkiluoto 3 EPR (OL3 EPR) project in FiGlobal law firm White & Case LLP has advised Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO), a Finnish electricity producer, on the negotiation of a global settlement agreement which ends its arbitration against French nuclear group Areva and German technology group Siemens in relation to the Olkiluoto 3 EPR (OL3 EPR) project in Figlobal settlement agreement which ends its arbitration against French nuclear group Areva and German technology group Siemens in relation to the Olkiluoto 3 EPR (OL3 EPR) project in Finland.

London has developed a global reputation in the field of dispute resolution — more international and commercial arbitrations take place in the capital under English law than in any other city in the world, and 90 % of commercial cases handled by London law firms involve an international party.

After adverting to the earlier judgment in case of Bhatia International (supra) and Venture Global (supra) it is held that the said judgments would have no application once the parties agreed by virtue of Clause 27.1 of the agreement that the arbitration proceeding would be conducted in Singapore i.e. the seat of arbitration would be in Singapore.