Not exact matches
If nothing is done to prevent the
expected rise of 2 degrees Celsius in
global average temperatures by 2050:
«You would
expect that the
temperatures in the north would be
rising faster than the
global average,» Laaksonen said.
According to the results, the area covered by carbon - rich frozen ground in the Arctic is
expected to shrink by 4m square km for every extra degree that
global average surface
temperature rises.
If I understand them, a reduction of 50 - 85 % of CO2 emissions will be required to stabilize at year 2000 levels, which may be
expected to produce a
global average temperature rise of around 2C.
But mean
temperatures are
expected to
rise faster than the
global average, decreasing crop yields, deepening poverty.
We might
expect «
global warming» (i.e., an increase in
average surface air
temperatures over a few decades) to lead to a
rise in
global mean sea levels.
Although plants in the colder regions are
expected to thrive as
average global temperatures rise, even this benefit could be limited.
But mean
temperatures are
expected to
rise faster in the continent than the
global average, decreasing crop yields and deepening poverty.
Scientists and climate models don't
expect any relief in the future, both agree that the
average global temperature of the Earth will continue to
rise which is bad news for us.
Climatologist Dr. Pielke Sr. rips RealClimate.org's claims: «It is straightforward to shed doubt on Gavin Schmidt's (and the IPCC) claim» — «If the increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentration were so dominate we would
expect the
global average [annual] lower troposphere
temperature to more - or less monotonically continue to
rise in the last decade or so.
Sea level
rise here is happening 3 - 4 times as quickly as the
global average — with the expectation, the USGS says, that «if
global temperatures continue to
rise, rates of sea level
rise in this area are
expected to continue increasing.»
As emissions of heat - trapping gases continue to
rise, and
global average temperatures continue to increase, we can
expect even more of the of extreme heat and related impacts we've been witnessing in recent years.
In the almost sure knowledge that the earth never experienced a runaway greenhouse even with ancient CO2 levels 10 to 20 times greater than today, these anti-science scoundrels insist with a «high level of confidence» that this amplification is real and it's based on nothing more than faster than
expected surface
temperature rise in the past few decades which can be TOTALLY explained by multi-decadal cyclic behavior in ocean currents, trade winds, and / or solar magnetic activity causing small
global average albedo changes.